Search content
Sort by
Showing 10 of 10 results by rullzzz
Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency
Does anybody seriously think Bitcoin tx fees will ever be as low as DASH tx fees? Bitcoin is the big one in crypto but others have some edge over it such as in transaction fees and innovation. DASH is being driven by a massive active community so hopefully things will be looking up in the coming months at least where the price is concerned. The current price does not seem to reflect the potential DASH has.
Hmm, good question! Even tho I love Bitcoin, paying 2+ EUR for a TX from my SegWit wallet it is too much, way too much imho.
Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency
I think anything less than c.$200 for DASH in the long term would be wrong. When the crypto markets pick up (post coronavirus) I hope DASH hots that price within 18 months.
I think it will go much higher by the end of 2021 (my personal opinion).
But hey, even 2.5x from here is not bad at all. Need more fiat
Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency
Life is largely a matter of expectation.
- Horace
- Horace
Agree, maybe it is too early, 1.5 months ago DASH was at 1/2 the price is now, so maybe my expectations are too high.
At least has recovered from under $50 which is still good
Re: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency
4 hours to go before Dash will have its yearly block reward reduction of 7,1 %
Funny that despite the block reward reduction the price is going down (a little bit) but still...
DASH should have been above $100 at this time, tbh. At least I personally expected to get above $100 mark.
Regarding the bad flips:
Maybe the team can implement a pre-validation flip verification, so the bad flips don't land on the Short session. The long validation can remain the same.
For example some humans apply to become super-verifiers which will verify part of the submitted flips and tag them "good" or "bad" from the already submitted flips (let's say 48h before validation starts) and make a pool from wich the flips will be chosen for the Short session.
Of course the super-verifiers will be rewarded extra for their effort, like master-nodes, if you wish.
Maybe the team can implement a pre-validation flip verification, so the bad flips don't land on the Short session. The long validation can remain the same.
For example some humans apply to become super-verifiers which will verify part of the submitted flips and tag them "good" or "bad" from the already submitted flips (let's say 48h before validation starts) and make a pool from wich the flips will be chosen for the Short session.
Of course the super-verifiers will be rewarded extra for their effort, like master-nodes, if you wish.
Let's kill decentralization to boost good flips ratio from 98.5% top 99%. Is that what you are saying? How many "super-verifiers" you need to try 5700 flips that are created each epoch? How much will you want network to pay to "super-verifiers" for solving 120 flips (considering 50 super-verifiers). You know that it will be deducted from total pool that is designated for all nodes? So most likely you will earn less with 95% score (with bad flips in network) than with 97% score (without bad flips in network). Will it increase network stability? No, it will decrease network safety, because each super-verifiers will know ~120 flips that will be part of short session. Will it decrease decentralization? Yes. Does it have any advantage for network other than less people that are complaining about having bad luck (probability ~1:50)? No.
I do agree that decentralization will be lost doing this.
Because 2-3 members complain that they got bad flips we don't have to change the protocol.
The idea of othell wasn't that bad (to fix the bad flips from SS), but is hard to implement and the protocol will have less decentralization.
<...>
Buggy or not it is what it is, there is not too much they can do, imo.
Is normal because they don't test the releases since this is the Testnet.
Why starting a new announcement?
I see NovaCoin is a 2013 old coin with an official thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=143221.0
I see NovaCoin is a 2013 old coin with an official thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=143221.0
Re: ⚡[ANN]⚡ ▐░Espers [ESP]░▌▐░PoW/PoS░▌▐░HMQ1725 Algo░▌ ▐░New Features░▌
Hello community!
Is there a working pool where I can mine this coin? The 2 ones from main page are giving me "Privacy error"
Thanks!
hey/look here https://fairpool.pro/site/coins?coin=ESPIs there a working pool where I can mine this coin? The 2 ones from main page are giving me "Privacy error"
Thanks!
Thank you!