Search content
Sort by

Showing 10 of 10 results by scamkhunt42
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers
by
scamkhunt42
on 17/09/2018, 20:38:07 UTC
It was LISKHQ first priority to fix the dynamic fees right after the core 1.0 release. Iker has his strategy ready to do this. Guess it will be fixed soon as promised.

dynamic fees should come with core 2.0 so it can take 6 months or longer. what is latest version? 1.2 is latest and they are working on 1.3 now.
but do they know how to do dynamic fees? do they know how to do sidechains? this can mean another delay.
i hope i am wrong and they do it fast and good.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers
by
scamkhunt42
on 27/01/2018, 21:28:31 UTC
Next topic:
keep on voting for Liskpro.com delegate #101, mates!
this generous, fair 80% pool really should not be replaced by the next 25% scrooge again!
http://abload.de/img/liskproamod5.jpg

alepop is working on implementation of lisk on trezor and is a hard working developer but that doesn't mean a shit to you, right?



You don't need to be this offensive to say the same thing.

ANW, alepop took the shot for all the delegates who still are DPOS parasites.

i was talking to this guy >Termie< who is calling a hard working developer a scrooge. he should have more respect instead of beeing a greedy voter who is insulting delegate alepop.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers
by
scamkhunt42
on 25/01/2018, 08:21:56 UTC
Next topic:
keep on voting for Liskpro.com delegate #101, mates!
this generous, fair 80% pool really should not be replaced by the next 25% scrooge again!
http://abload.de/img/liskproamod5.jpg

alepop is working on implementation of lisk on trezor and is a hard working developer but that doesn't mean a shit to you, right?

Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][LSK] Lisk | Blockchain Application Platform for JavaScript Developers
by
scamkhunt42
on 11/01/2018, 15:58:50 UTC
Can somebody please tell me if it is still possible to vote for lisk elite group and still get rewards?  on their website it says they are not allowing new registrations.  thanks!

yes you can vote and get rewards. i have asked this quesion to someone from elites group. they only closed the registration for new members.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion (Altcoins)
Re: poloniex.com are scamming and stealing coins! Beware!
by
scamkhunt42
on 20/05/2017, 11:33:45 UTC
Please post a screenshot of your support tickets. I would like to read them. Maybe they show us why they were closed.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
by
scamkhunt42
on 11/05/2017, 10:16:13 UTC
Thank you tonych!

Can't wait for the next distribution(s). How many will follow?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
by
scamkhunt42
on 11/05/2017, 10:06:45 UTC
One more try.  Grin

1. I created Copay wallet. It contained 1 address (AAAAA).
2. I sent 8 BTC to AAAAA
3. Then I sent 0.001xxx BTC from AAAAA to Byteball
4. What Copay did:
   a) They sent 0.001xxx BTC from AAAAA to Byteball
   b) They sent 0.05 BTC from AAAAA to BBBBB (I never did this transaction - it's done automatically for what ever reason)
5. Now I have two addresses in my Copay wallet (AAAAA with 7.949 BTC + BBBBB with 0.05 BTC)
6. How do I get the BTC from BBBBB to AAAAA?

I hope this makes it clear.

This is not correctly.  You could not have put in 8 btc and only sent out .05.
There has to be input and output.
So, I think you have several small transactions going into AAAAA and the wallet app took the closest matching which was close to the TX you wanted to make.  it was done and then a fee was paid and the rest of the change went back to another address.

What is the Transaction ID for your step 3?

You are right. I didn't send the 8 BTC at once. I sent it in 3 transactions into AAAAA. After this, I sent the 0.001 to byteball and with this transaction, Copay did this "ghost transaction" of 0.05 BTC to BBBBB.

BTW: How many distributions of byteballs will follow?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
by
scamkhunt42
on 11/05/2017, 07:39:21 UTC
Hey Michail. No. It's like what I said. I had 1 address in my CoPay wallet.
I send 0.001 from it. But what CoPay did: It sent the 0.001 + 0.05 to a new adress which contains now to my wallet.
The 0.05 are still mine. But now I don't know how to get the 0.05 back to my big address.

Which is what I said.  Change address.

But, without seeing the transaction ID, it's hard to explain/guess.  You're welcome to message me directly to work through this, but asking in a forum without any information is simply going to get a lot of guessing done.   What you think and what I think are simply guesswork until we're both looking at the same thing.

One more try.  Grin

1. I created Copay wallet. It contained 1 address (AAAAA).
2. I sent 8 BTC to AAAAA
3. Then I sent 0.001xxx BTC from AAAAA to Byteball
4. What Copay did:
   a) They sent 0.001xxx BTC from AAAAA to Byteball
   b) They sent 0.05 BTC from AAAAA to BBBBB (I never did this transaction - it's done automatically for what ever reason)
5. Now I have two addresses in my Copay wallet (AAAAA with 7.949 BTC + BBBBB with 0.05 BTC)
6. How do I get the BTC from BBBBB to AAAAA?

I hope this makes it clear.
Im not familiar with copay wallet, but if you not control private key, In my opinion you have only one way: send full amount to other wallet and than send back to AAAAA

With Copay you only hold the private key for the wallet itself. I don't know how this technically is working but it's odd that they create a new address and make a parallel transaction to it.
So, it looks like Copay isn't a good choice for things like byteball, where you need all BTC in one address. I am glad they only sent 0.05 BTC to the new address and not 50/50.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
by
scamkhunt42
on 11/05/2017, 07:09:52 UTC
Hey Michail. No. It's like what I said. I had 1 address in my CoPay wallet.
I send 0.001 from it. But what CoPay did: It sent the 0.001 + 0.05 to a new adress which contains now to my wallet.
The 0.05 are still mine. But now I don't know how to get the 0.05 back to my big address.

Which is what I said.  Change address.

But, without seeing the transaction ID, it's hard to explain/guess.  You're welcome to message me directly to work through this, but asking in a forum without any information is simply going to get a lot of guessing done.   What you think and what I think are simply guesswork until we're both looking at the same thing.

One more try.  Grin

1. I created Copay wallet. It contained 1 address (AAAAA).
2. I sent 8 BTC to AAAAA
3. Then I sent 0.001xxx BTC from AAAAA to Byteball
4. What Copay did:
   a) They sent 0.001xxx BTC from AAAAA to Byteball
   b) They sent 0.05 BTC from AAAAA to BBBBB (I never did this transaction - it's done automatically for what ever reason)
5. Now I have two addresses in my Copay wallet (AAAAA with 7.949 BTC + BBBBB with 0.05 BTC)
6. How do I get the BTC from BBBBB to AAAAA?

I hope this makes it clear.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: BYTEBALL: Totally new consensus algorithm + private untraceable payments
by
scamkhunt42
on 10/05/2017, 22:01:33 UTC
I've a question. I am using CoPay.
This is what happend:
I sent 8.5 BTC to my fresh CoPay wallet.
Then I send the 0.001xxxx BTC for confirmation to Byteball.
But CoPay not just sent the 0.001xxx. They created a new
address for my wallet and sent 0.05 BTC to it.
Now these 0.05 BTC are not longer in my linked account.
How can I get the 0.05 BTC back into the main account?
Anyone using the CoPay app?