Well I say if people are that worried about their Neptune having bad ROI when KnC finally ships them and want to request a refund, go for it! I will wait thanks, if people have done their home work they would know that Knc is pretty good at watching the ROI themselves and wouldn't sell you a box that you never make your investment back on.

I recommend to those who are thinking about asking for a refund to let go of their monkey minds and let things take their course. There is always going to be people who easily panic over the silliest things, but that doesn't mean you need to as well.

Hello,
 
  I have kinda been looking into trying this, but I was wondering.... I see that you can set reserves for held BTC and USD what I would like to know is if that can be set as a percentage? IE can I do 30% instead of $500?

The bottom line is no GPU card can pull as much current per cable as a KNC board does.


I highly doubt that. I have a 7970 myself, so can speak from experience. I've ran benchmarks @ 1340Mhz / 7600Mhz and 1.33V core which is a lot.

+1 

You surely must be mistaken:

What GPU pulls 350W?
How many cables are you using per GPU?
Are you aware that the PCI-E slot provides 75W of the total power?
Are you using powered PCI-E risers?

When you answer these questions you will understand that each 12V circuit on the GPU cabling uses less that the KNC board

we should never put too much trust on one individual, Satoshi nakomoto designed the Bitcoin protocol so the trust is distributed among all miners and not one single pool/organization/individual, what is happening is a potential risk no matter how trustworthy the operator is....

otherwise I would not count on Ghash.IO because they are not trustworthy, what miners are not aware of is that this same pool tried to double spend few months ago when they had only 23% of the network hashpower and there is nothing stopping them from doing it again, especially now when they control this amount of power. for reference  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=327767.0

please explain to me, why they have 0% fee ? what is the point ?  now that they are being a big risk why didnt they do something about it ? the only effort they did is to release a statement that once they reach 51% that they will give the chance for people buying power there to point their miners to other pools but then it will be too late....


it seems that all effort we are doing doesn't count for anything, and it seems that miners doesn't give a flying fuck about the network security, and it seems that each time we talk about this risk is like we do them a free advertisement because their hash rate keep growing ever since.

you miners are the only ones that can change this, so please start acting responsibly.

Dear KNC, if you read this,
Happy New Year!!!
You set a new standard and I am eternally grateful for all your hard work, your integrity and work ethics. Do not mind some people complaining, there will always be some. Majority of the customers, like myself can see the nobility of your company, following the legacy of brave Vikings. May your success continue in the new year!

Yours faithfully,
monsieur

My Jupiter was consistently doing 679 GH/s and I've seen similar rigs being sold on eBay, so the "circa 700" seems credible. I did also see a lot of 650 and 660 GH/s so of course not all of them got close to 700.

Does anyone actually have their bot running atm? If so how's it doing? Mine sold at $859 and i turned it off once the tumble began. I'm scared to turn it back on. Anyone care to share some wisdom? settings? i'm living vicariously through bitcoinwisdom with my bot's EMA settings: 7/15 so far it seems like it would've been ok.

Wouldn't pausing the bot be like restarting it? This way it is like starting from 0 all over again?

Currently my bot shows "Invalid Symbol" instead of a graph when I click on BTC-e.  Is anyone else having this issue?

  they still assembling and hopefully deliver until end of this week the Nov batch! toxic coffee in the morning?

this is sarcasm, right??

i find the bot algorithm can be much more improved, the focus is into get bitcoins, not FIAT, we must asume the bitcoin pirce will always go up in the long term.

so

there must be an option called " % drop "
so you can put there for example: "10%"

and when EMA lines configuration trigger a sell,  then the bot will buy again when one of the next events its done:

1º if EMA lines crosses back then buy to cut losses.
2º if 10% price drop is achieved then sell all, don't be greedy waiting EMA linea crosses back because you might end up loosing bitcoins


also can be improved further just buy putting a second "% drop"

1º - 10%
2º - 20%


this way, in the first non greddy event that the market price drops a 10% you buy with 90% of your money
and if EMA lines are not crossing back, then you still have a 10% of cash to buy back more bitcoins in case it drops further.

if it dont drop further, then EMA lines will cross back and that 10% will be used to buy back at the current price waiting a new drop trend

the market price must be monitorized in real time, end EMA events in a period of time...

This is a fundamental problem that needs to be addressed. I use another bot that is far superior and gives you the options. This has very little to control your losses in a high volume market.

Their was no need to test the "recommed" settings read my postings in this thread where i pointed that out already that btc-usd trading with ema is a slow sell off of bitcoins and as bitcoins keep increasing it shows usd profit but only because btc price get higher not from good trades.

But seems the developer isn't reading frequently here.

Using recommended settings.

Butterbot buy btc at price x. btc prices drops $180, Butterbot sells at $150+ loss per BTC. Butterbot buys back at high price just below my initial purchase price. 10%+ loss. Better just leaving your BTC as BTC.

Closer to 20% loss.

I don't know how, since there's been no EMA cross to sell.