Hello everyone.
After a period of running, the current mining of luck should have been monopolized by FPGA, which obviously goes against the original intention of luck.
Consider the future of luck, we are planning to change luck's mining algorithm from argon2d to RandomX (the hash function used by the Monero project). According to our research, RandomX is only CPU mining, FPGA has no advantage over CPU. The upgrade may be carried out recently. Please pay attention to it, thank you.
In addition, who have a deep understanding of the CPU mining algorithm, please share more experiences about the mining algorithm, and provide more suggestions, thank you.
Good luck to luck.

Another hard fork? Ouch. Why changing algo to RandomX and not something yescrypt-based? As far as I know, small CPU miners are mining many yespower-based coins. If it would be possible to mine Monero using CPU, I would do it since I heard about this coin. Also, another problem is that it is now impossible to get less than blockReward coins without using pools. And I think that is the main reason why pools are created: people joined Bitcoin pools not because algo was unfriendly, but because mining 50 coins was getting more and more difficult.

a little interested in the concept of this project, but I haven't seen such a video tutorial for mining using windows, it's a shame it's never provided, if you want this project to have a lot of community you need to make lots of writing or video tutorials so that everyone comes for this project, but I will study a little there

As you wish, this coin was destroyed by miners with great arithmetic.

ok, i will add the links as well as the discard links to the first page.

news? This is a shitcoin ?

Thanks, you're right. I was lazy and used this:
The correct code is:
I tested it, and it's still wrong I won't update my screenshot for this.

@ranochigo
thank you. It makes sense

ffff83c18001800180018001c003c003c003c003800180018001800183c1ffff

This is all very strange...But I do not think the OP is trying to fool anyone by sending malicious files. He could put the file directly for download if that was the case. Or he could send it to anyone who asked. However, he asks for evidence that anyone offering to help demonstrate on video how he will recover. But, it may be that the OP is trying to trick somebody or do some kind of crime with that request for help.

To offer 100BTC, which today is worth almost half a million dollars, I believe it has something like 5000BTC in this wallet. I have tried to find some wallet that had been opened for the last time in 2016, but I did not find it, maybe someone can do it. The video was posted by a personal profile. In a few minutes, it is possible to discover the profile on facebook and some other social media. In addition to some news related to MLM scam, That may be about the same person or just a coincidence about the same name.

But there is a high possibility that this can be an elaborate attempt of a scam or is an attempting to recover the funds that were obtained with a MLM/scam. So anyway, since the OP does not want to write in a clearer way telling what actually happened, and did not try to use the help offered by gmaxwell, I could only thank him for making Bitcoin more rare and valuable.

If you are reliable, then please repeat same what we did on youtube (on same bitcoin core version), put there 0.01btc and get it back. With results please share me directly. I think it's about everyone who are looking for reward.

Hello,

exactly like in topic. I've lost a lot of bitcoins and looking for help. I was trying to solve it in past, couldn't.. Right now I want to come back to topic and make it happen somehow. Do anyone know how to solve this problem? Reward is 100BTC and this thread is completely serious.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BOxflDzhgU&t=3s

Share with friends to make this topic loud.. You could help rescue massive amounts of bitcoins.

====

PC is completely frozen. Nobody touch it and we have made image of all hard drive so it's safe. Our idea is to look for private keys through hex and we checked all PC length and breadth. There were found some bitcoins, but not that... I think private key to this wallet could be partially broken, but I'm not sure..

Dear all.

I have been involved in xdag since January this year and I have looked at the tech and the efforts put in by the development team.
I have also been the first to question a lot of the technology behind xdag, and as a result I have been silenced from the chat channels, banned by the 'community' and 'punished' for questioning the tech behind the transport layer used in xdag - DNET.

I will offer this disclaimer that i continue to mine xdag with significant hashpower and none of my findings pointed out in this post are based on prejudices or misconceptions. My considerations are based purely on the fact that this coin seems to  be gaining huge value OTC by none more than hype, based on no solid foundation.

Although I have been involved in many cryptocurrencies dating all the way back to the conception of bitcoin in 2009, I initially worked on this coin (XDAG) with a few friends who wanted to simply, develop a pool for miners to mine xdag.

We set up a pool, however found some initial problems with the existing software. At first, it was considered that the software was the main issue and we then went on to build a second pool to alleviate our fears that the base tech of the coin was not the issue. After numerous issues on the first pool (continual disconnections and archive shares being lost) we built a second pool on a much more expensive (and expansive) server.

This second pool at least kept connection, but there was still a nagging issue that we could not quite put our fingers on. This second pool took around two weeks to build, sync and allow mining upon.

this was a concern.

So... we built a third pool, on a third server, even better spec than previous pools. This pool synced great, only connected by two other nodes... the previous two pools which were built for us - both 'whitelisted' in the centralized method of the DNET transport layer that XDAG employs.

Then i got to reading the actual DNET protocol.

oh shit.

If i were to set up a specific number of pools (nodes) on the network and have each connected via the whitelist, I could basically turn xdag into a local network - controlled by the number of nodes I have set up and thus; dictate where xdag coins could be produced and by whom.





...


some of you may have noticed a drop in many of the pools over the past couple of weeks?

my apologies.

...

Only a few pools remained online?

it was not my intent to cause harm.

...


why was that?

DNET testing.

...


Basically the dnet transport layer is designed to be used only as a local network, and has very limited capacity (this is why your cpu's idle at 100% when you mine xdag with your gpu's - although I have found this beneficial to other projects I have since been involved in.)

I set up a network of machines, linked to each other that concluded the network capabilities of xdag.
I left a few pools online, and most of xdag miners across the world have managed to switch over to to those pools in the past few days.

I've now powered down the 38 machines which were all running my 'local network' of xdag pools.

But let this be a warning... if someone who had BAD intentions came along, they could easily do the same as I have done and take complete control of the xdag network.. make a quick fork and move all of the xdag coins onto their local nodes (pools).



I've warned the community of xdag for many weeks now that this issue was a growing concern, and what has been the result?

truth hurts. let's ignore, ban, move along.... keep building our house on a foundation of sand(!?)


DNET AND THE WHITELIST OF XDAG are a growing concern, stop hyping a coin simply because it is the 'first mineable DAG'



all apologies.

yours in decentralised truth,

LeCoquin, Kyrusfables, Raskul.. et al...

i will post no more on XDAG.

is there any works been done on RPC port is it is tradable on exchanges