Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 148 results by shad
here are some scrypt info's, not really X6500 releated
https://github.com/kramble/FPGA-Litecoin-Miner
http://wiki.ztex.de/doku.php?id=en:ztex_boards:ztex_fpga_boards:litcoin_mining_on_fpga
https://github.com/kramble/FPGA-Litecoin-Miner
http://wiki.ztex.de/doku.php?id=en:ztex_boards:ztex_fpga_boards:litcoin_mining_on_fpga
Re: looking for sha256 miners to test new profit switching multipool
autmatic payout in BTC?
registration necessary? would like to use only wallet-adress
(thats why i am not on megamultipool or multipool)
if you still need a little hashingpower and the above criteria are fullfilled i would switch in one week
registration necessary? would like to use only wallet-adress
(thats why i am not on megamultipool or multipool)if you still need a little hashingpower and the above criteria are fullfilled i would switch in one week
they are considering since 4 month
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/149q2f/flattr_is_considering_bitcoin_integration/
i am losing faith
is it really that hard? with bitpay it should be easy to pay into flattr
i don't care about payouts because i am only paying into that nice system
there are 2 options:
1. they start accepting soon
2. someone clones the idea and makes it bitcoin only, i guess it would spread well inside the community
http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/149q2f/flattr_is_considering_bitcoin_integration/
i am losing faith
is it really that hard? with bitpay it should be easy to pay into flattr
i don't care about payouts because i am only paying into that nice system
there are 2 options:
1. they start accepting soon
2. someone clones the idea and makes it bitcoin only, i guess it would spread well inside the community
Actually this is where FPGA's have an advantage. They're not useful for the average user, but for hobbyists and anyone with a lot of data can reprogram it for anything. That's why FPGA's are so versatile and exceed ASIC's. You can reprogram an FPGA to work for SHA256 or even scrypt or for doing dictionary generation.
i don't think you can use it for scrypt, at least not this boards without any memory, but i guess many people would like to see a scrypt firmeware
hi having some troubles with my board after running since dez2011 i think 
first i am getting
then mpbm wants to reset clockrate
last but not least the firmware will be reloaded, sometimes only FPGA0 comes up, and FPGA1 isn't mining
some ideas? i didn't ever change the setup, and that version of mpbm is running for a long time
first i am getting
Quote
2013-04-15 17:31:21.901 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.060 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.120 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.280 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.339 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.499 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.060 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.120 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.280 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.339 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
2013-04-15 17:31:22.499 [200] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Got H-not-zero share 00000000
then mpbm wants to reset clockrate
Quote
2013-04-15 17:32:04.386 [500] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Tracking: Setting clock speed to 50.00 MHz...
2013-04-15 17:32:04.479 [100] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 444, in main
if self.firmware_rev > 0: self._set_speed(self.parent.settings.initialspeed)
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 666, in _set_speed
self._update_job_interval()
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 676, in _update_job_interval
interval = min(60, 2**32 / 1000000. / self.stats.mhps)
ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero
2013-04-15 17:32:05.051 [500] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Tracking: Setting clock speed to 50.00 MHz...
2013-04-15 17:32:05.212 [100] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 444, in main
if self.firmware_rev > 0: self._set_speed(self.parent.settings.initialspeed)
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 666, in _set_speed
self._update_job_interval()
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 676, in _update_job_interval
interval = min(60, 2**32 / 1000000. / self.stats.mhps)
ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero
2013-04-15 17:32:04.479 [100] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 444, in main
if self.firmware_rev > 0: self._set_speed(self.parent.settings.initialspeed)
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 666, in _set_speed
self._update_job_interval()
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 676, in _update_job_interval
interval = min(60, 2**32 / 1000000. / self.stats.mhps)
ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero
2013-04-15 17:32:05.051 [500] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Tracking: Setting clock speed to 50.00 MHz...
2013-04-15 17:32:05.212 [100] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 444, in main
if self.firmware_rev > 0: self._set_speed(self.parent.settings.initialspeed)
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 666, in _set_speed
self._update_job_interval()
File "/root/Modular-Python-Bitcoin-Miner2/modules/fpgamining/x6500/x6500worker.py", line 676, in _update_job_interval
interval = min(60, 2**32 / 1000000. / self.stats.mhps)
ZeroDivisionError: float division by zero
last but not least the firmware will be reloaded, sometimes only FPGA0 comes up, and FPGA1 isn't mining
some ideas? i didn't ever change the setup, and that version of mpbm is running for a long time
Re: [4000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
i am using MPBM, worked fine for months before stratum update
i didn`t get an accept or reject msg, guess not many people are running stratum miner on a router
restarted miner works again...
never touch a running system....
i didn`t get an accept or reject msg, guess not many people are running stratum miner on a router
restarted miner works again...
never touch a running system....
Re: [4000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
my miner says its sending valid share
but statistics on the pool page says i havn't send valid shares since some blocks
pool problem or my problem?
Quote
2013-03-13 18:26:38.286 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000eb50701 00cfeb09e7f9aa64f766b4cde8fd7a2660df9d0578a4a4b37223dbff15140b69e1a03d74b:6063807e
2013-03-13 18:26:43.131 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000cfcc38d 4952e594d59fec39db621def2ee438f814ad88e51eeb46f41f01ac3f75140b6a61a03d74b:9936b45f
2013-03-13 18:26:44.136 [400] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Mining slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000e286425 1d96579937d4fb39645d767ecee42ef1f2f2769eff167ae21f3e6459f5140b6b01a03d74b
2013-03-13 18:26:47.716 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000e286425 1d96579937d4fb39645d767ecee42ef1f2f2769eff167ae21f3e6459f5140b6b01a03d74b:63863d22
2013-03-13 18:27:01.614 [400] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Mining slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000d924a43 1a64001d9c396efbffba63830c6ce7887c9996f375e74f1ec61770f9a5140b6c11a03d74b
2013-03-13 18:27:10.098 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000d924a43 1a64001d9c396efbffba63830c6ce7887c9996f375e74f1ec61770f9a5140b6c11a03d74b:921f865a
2013-03-13 18:27:11.761 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000d924a43 1a64001d9c396efbffba63830c6ce7887c9996f375e74f1ec61770f9a5140b6c11a03d74b:a2d2b36e
2013-03-13 18:26:43.131 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA0: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000cfcc38d 4952e594d59fec39db621def2ee438f814ad88e51eeb46f41f01ac3f75140b6a61a03d74b:9936b45f
2013-03-13 18:26:44.136 [400] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Mining slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000e286425 1d96579937d4fb39645d767ecee42ef1f2f2769eff167ae21f3e6459f5140b6b01a03d74b
2013-03-13 18:26:47.716 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000e286425 1d96579937d4fb39645d767ecee42ef1f2f2769eff167ae21f3e6459f5140b6b01a03d74b:63863d22
2013-03-13 18:27:01.614 [400] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Mining slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000d924a43 1a64001d9c396efbffba63830c6ce7887c9996f375e74f1ec61770f9a5140b6c11a03d74b
2013-03-13 18:27:10.098 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000d924a43 1a64001d9c396efbffba63830c6ce7887c9996f375e74f1ec61770f9a5140b6c11a03d74b:921f865a
2013-03-13 18:27:11.761 [350] X6500 board AH00WIX5 FPGA1: Found share: slush Stratum:00000002a994272b2941b303babc2c58ba42b3c2e01537c9d6c99a1e000002b200000000d924a43 1a64001d9c396efbffba63830c6ce7887c9996f375e74f1ec61770f9a5140b6c11a03d74b:a2d2b36e
but statistics on the pool page says i havn't send valid shares since some blocks
pool problem or my problem?
Re: [4000 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested
sending an email to getwork users with announcing setting fee to 10%
and
banning miners without longpoll support are to different things
sure i don't care, mining on multiple pools is a nice thing
also you are the only pool where i have longpoll problems i didn't even notice
trying stratum on stratum.bitcoin.cz works better than on api.bitcoin.cz
and
banning miners without longpoll support are to different things
sure i don't care, mining on multiple pools is a nice thing
also you are the only pool where i have longpoll problems i didn't even notice
trying stratum on stratum.bitcoin.cz works better than on api.bitcoin.cz
Is it supposed to look like this, lol? Help!
Try Chrome/Chromium (this is how it looks like on Firefox).
I refuse to install Chrome (AKA Google Botnet) since it's a massive security hole and records everything you type into the URL bar. Opera is my main browser due to the tight securty options but the console log never shows up in it.
or try safari it works too
i use it only for that, and only because its preinstalled on osx
V2 even more secure because of knowleg of outgoing address and fee integration
i hope getaccountaddress gives the last adress we set to that account, you should check that if you really want to use that code
maybe sending all btc to one adress in first place is not so genius...
Quote
numberoftransactions=100
maxwaitpertransaction=60
fee=0.0005
rpc.setaccount(rpc.getnewadress(),'account0')
rpc.sendtoaddress(getaccountaddress('account'+0),rpc.getbalance(*,10))
while(rpc.getbalance('account0',10)!=rpc.getbalance('account0',0))
(
wait(10)
)
numberofaccounts=0
for (i=0;i(
while(rpc.getbalance('account'+i,10)!=rpc.getbalance('account'+i,0))
(
wait(10)
print('.')
)
tosend=(rpc.getbalance(('account'+i,10)-fee)/2)
rand=random(max=tosend/3)
rpc.setaccount(rpc.getnewadress(),'account'+i)
rpc.setaccount(rpc.getnewadress(),'account'+(i+1))
rpc.sendmany<'account'+i>(getaccountaddress('account'+(numberofaccounts+1), tosend+rand,getaccountaddress('account'+(numberofaccounts+2),amounttosend-rand)
numberofaccounts= numberofaccounts+2
wait(random(max= maxwaitpertransaction))
)
maxwaitpertransaction=60
fee=0.0005
rpc.setaccount(rpc.getnewadress(),'account0')
rpc.sendtoaddress(getaccountaddress('account'+0),rpc.getbalance(*,10))
while(rpc.getbalance('account0',10)!=rpc.getbalance('account0',0))
(
wait(10)
)
numberofaccounts=0
for (i=0;i(
while(rpc.getbalance('account'+i,10)!=rpc.getbalance('account'+i,0))
(
wait(10)
print('.')
)
tosend=(rpc.getbalance(('account'+i,10)-fee)/2)
rand=random(max=tosend/3)
rpc.setaccount(rpc.getnewadress(),'account'+i)
rpc.setaccount(rpc.getnewadress(),'account'+(i+1))
rpc.sendmany<'account'+i>(getaccountaddress('account'+(numberofaccounts+1), tosend+rand,getaccountaddress('account'+(numberofaccounts+2),amounttosend-rand)
numberofaccounts= numberofaccounts+2
wait(random(max= maxwaitpertransaction))
)
i hope getaccountaddress gives the last adress we set to that account, you should check that if you really want to use that code
maybe sending all btc to one adress in first place is not so genius...
why use an external service?
some pseudo code:
fee= 0.005*numberofrounds*numberofwalletsperround/2
some pseudo code:
Quote
numberofrounds=100
numberofwalletsperround=100
maxtimeperround=60
for (i=1;i<=numberofrounds;i++)
(
for (j=1;j<=numberofwalletsperround;j++)
(
array(i,j)=rpc.getnewaddress
)
)
for (i=1;i<=numberofrounds;i++)
(
for (j=1;j<=numberofwalletsperround/2;j++)
(
amountosend=rpc.getbalance(*,10)/(numberofwalletsperround-2*(j-1));
rand=random(max=amountosend/(numberofwalletsperround-2*(j-1)+1))
rpc.sendmany array(i,(j*2)-1) amounttosend-rand array(i,j*2) amounttosend+rand
wait(random(max=maxtimeperround/(numberofwalletsperround/2)))
)
)
while(rpc.getbalance(*,10)!=rpc.getbalance(*,0))
(
wait(10)
)
)
numberofwalletsperround=100
maxtimeperround=60
for (i=1;i<=numberofrounds;i++)
(
for (j=1;j<=numberofwalletsperround;j++)
(
array(i,j)=rpc.getnewaddress
)
)
for (i=1;i<=numberofrounds;i++)
(
for (j=1;j<=numberofwalletsperround/2;j++)
(
amountosend=rpc.getbalance(*,10)/(numberofwalletsperround-2*(j-1));
rand=random(max=amountosend/(numberofwalletsperround-2*(j-1)+1))
rpc.sendmany array(i,(j*2)-1) amounttosend-rand array(i,j*2) amounttosend+rand
wait(random(max=maxtimeperround/(numberofwalletsperround/2)))
)
)
while(rpc.getbalance(*,10)!=rpc.getbalance(*,0))
(
wait(10)
)
)
fee= 0.005*numberofrounds*numberofwalletsperround/2
meine takten auf max 190mhz mit aktiv kühlung
ich würde dir einen initial wert von 150 empfehlen, nach ein paar stunden schauen wo sie sind und dann den inital wert ein bischen darunter legen
ich weiß nicht ob sie auch unter den inital wert takten..
ich würde dir einen initial wert von 150 empfehlen, nach ein paar stunden schauen wo sie sind und dann den inital wert ein bischen darunter legen
ich weiß nicht ob sie auch unter den inital wert takten..