I don't see how using very general information that every other coin have in their whitepaper is so much of a big deal.
I get it plagiarism is bad in every way, but that's also so many ways to say the same thing over and over and over again.
Also, the fact that general information was used, doesn't disprove the rest of the purpose of the project. With multiple partners, we have never had issues going public, the owner of SpectreSecurityCoin goes on live shows all the time to talk about the coin. Feel free to jump in one time and go ask your questions.
That Spectre project thing... they're salty as shit for no real reason. Our name is different with two (2) whole words. Let me break it down, Spectre Security Coin. How's that the same thing as Spectre? The ticker is similar, yes, but not the same XSPEC vs XSPC. There's so many coins with similar name with similar ticker. Also, our name servers a purpose with our project goal. Spectre being a vulnerability in computing, it relate to us and our network security purpose. Their name doesn't display anything from their purpose. For all I care they could be called Ghost or Shadow[Coin] which could also work for an anonymity centric coin.
Let me check experience chain for example. They stole experience points IP, used a similar name with chain instead of points and used a similar ticker XPC instead of XP. That's only part of it and yet, I haven't seen anyone go around and call them scammers.