Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 60 results by shbtc
Re: [ANN] AsicCoin (ASC) | SHA256 - The coin for ASIC Mining! | No Premine
Post here to have AsicCoin accepted by coinpayments.com.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=309935.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=309935.0
Re: [ANN] AsicCoin (ASC) | SHA256 - The coin for ASIC Mining! | No Premine
CGMiner wont recognize my BE. I'm on Linux using this command:
0 Mhs
What am I doing wrong?
Code:
cgminer -G --icarus-options 115200:1:1 --icarus-timing 3.0=100 -S COM3 -S COM4 -S COM5 -o stratum+tcp://www.japool.com:13433 -u A2Xx9FhixsKFQMYLmntxBmuM7ArxYMpjBi_1 -p password
0 Mhs
What am I doing wrong?
A seat buyback plan is interesting. That would be a unique feature with some benefits down the road. What I don't like about that option, is it takes the decision to reinvest out of the seat owner's hands and forces it to a small extent. I'm leaning towards thinking it should be paid back to miners via some sort of unique and fun process. That way, people are encouraged to mine with us even if they aren't in a position to be acquiring more and more seats. The 2.1% fee is already helping the seat owners, so I say we create a new and exciting way to let miners in on some Nasty fun to encourage pool growth. The more fun miners are having, the more that 2.1% will help NastyFans. More thoughts on this subject are certainly welcome.
Roughly what percentage of the pool's mining yield is alt coins? I think reducing the pool fee by this amount and using the alt coins for a portion of management and Nasty Fans cut would be the best option. This encourages people to use the pool and would be the easiest to implement since you wouldn't need to convert as often. If you only need to convert the .9% monthly, you could wait for a preferable exchange rate.
What dependencies are you talking about?
Could you post the tx you'd like to broadcast?
Could you post the tx you'd like to broadcast?
Well bitcoin-qt just corrected itself. 20 confirmations.
Dependencies:
Debian-based Linux:
aptitude install build-essential python-dev python-twisted python-bsddb3
I have a large transaction that appears to have been abandoned by the network, no confirmations in 5 hours. I'm using Ubuntu 13.04 and when I try to get the dependencies I get these error messages:
E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (13: Permission denied)
E: Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/), are you root?
I've already used the sudo command.
I can't wait a week because the transaction is to a temporary deposit address to CampBX that expires in 1 day, 9 hours. Any ideas? Any other ways to remedy this?
E: Could not open lock file /var/lib/dpkg/lock - open (13: Permission denied)
E: Unable to lock the administration directory (/var/lib/dpkg/), are you root?
I've already used the sudo command.
I can't wait a week because the transaction is to a temporary deposit address to CampBX that expires in 1 day, 9 hours. Any ideas? Any other ways to remedy this?
Maybe differencing on the output ampere does affect
Corsair AX1200
Enermax ENM750
I dont know for sure, because I dont have these things. but you may check about it.
*edit: or maybe the broken PSU already "affecting" the avalon
Corsair AX1200
Enermax ENM750
I dont know for sure, because I dont have these things. but you may check about it.
*edit: or maybe the broken PSU already "affecting" the avalon
Address is below
|||||
|||
|
|||||
|||
|
The broken PSU is no longer a factor. I bought and installed the new Corsair, which gave me the red error light and 0 Gh/s. The corsair box was already open when I bought it, meaning it had already been returned. I returned it today, in case it was defective, and am now using an Enermax Platimax 1200.
I have sold this 4 module unit and have to deliver it this weekend. I had it mining with an old Enermax 750W PSU that came with another batch 2 that I sold a few weeks ago. I was overclocking this one to 300 and was getting 98 Gh/s from the pool. As the hashrate dropped to 20 Gh/s over the course of 2 days, I figured I'd burned out the PSU. I just bought a Corsair AX1200 and plugged it in. Now when I turn it on, the fans don't even rev up like they used to. The LED on the right is flashing green, the left is solid red. OpenWRT shows 0 Gh/s.
PAYMENT
Whoever can get this up and running in the next 48 hours can have their choice of 1 BTC or 24 hrs of mining.
PAYMENT
Whoever can get this up and running in the next 48 hours can have their choice of 1 BTC or 24 hrs of mining.
I handed over $19,000 in Bank of America money orders exactly one week ago and the funds are still not available. I drive to the location every time, since their office is only 45 mins from my house. I have personally met both the owner and his sister, who usually picks up the deposits. I sat in the break room at the Regus office, filled out the money orders, then personally handed this particular deposit to his sister and we counted the money orders together to confirm the amount. I sent an email yesterday and have not yet gotten a response. I have been using CampBX for about 2 years now and it has never taken more than 48 hrs for funds to be available. I'm starting to get worried...
Re: Starting a new FPGA mining farm/contract! Cognitive Resurrected on [BTC-TC]
Great!
Also, for our next round of COG.F I am thinking we stick with the same contract, and just change the inital price per contract for 20 shares from 2.5 to 10 btc each. This effectively prices the contracts at BTC0.5 per share.
Our last round of COG.F sold at BTC2.5 per contract for 20 shares and is now trading at BTC12 each! I hope to see the same kind of turnaround for our COG.F holders this time around
The security will be called COG.F2 and is already pending admin approval then will be up for voting on BTC-TC, but will not become active until the motion passes, of course!
I do believe a split will help liquidity on the market. I believe a 1:2 split would be more beneficial for Cognitive, on the basis that we would still have the integrity of being around BTC0.5 per share. If there are no objections I'll raise a motion for a 1:2 split
If you're seriously considering a stock split and favour a btc 0.5/share price for current shares and possibly the cog.f2 shares, a 1:2 split may not be enough. The shares are around 0.8-0.9 at the moment and if they split 1:2 the price will be around 0.4-0.45, then say things go quite well and the price jumps like it did with basic-mining, we're right back to this price point in no time at all.Also, for our next round of COG.F I am thinking we stick with the same contract, and just change the inital price per contract for 20 shares from 2.5 to 10 btc each. This effectively prices the contracts at BTC0.5 per share.
Our last round of COG.F sold at BTC2.5 per contract for 20 shares and is now trading at BTC12 each! I hope to see the same kind of turnaround for our COG.F holders this time around
The security will be called COG.F2 and is already pending admin approval then will be up for voting on BTC-TC, but will not become active until the motion passes, of course!
why not 1:10 split??
I do believe a split will help liquidity on the market. I believe a 1:2 split would be more beneficial for Cognitive, on the basis that we would still have the integrity of being around BTC0.5 per share. If there are no objections I'll raise a motion for a 1:2 split
i personally think if we are going to split might as well do at least 1/5 if not 1/10.
we don't want to have to do a split right after a split.
^ This ^