Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 42 results by shrodes
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
The deletion notices clearly state that it's the thread creator doing it.
Fair enough. In that case I agree that Ken shouldn't be focusing on deleting posts questioning his update...
Surely it's more productive to come in here and actually answer the questions and concerns people have if you have time to delete posts?
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Generally I loathe when forum members post back to back to back to back - I mean learn to use the damn edit button - but I couldn't agree more with mabsy here...
It's good to see names from the beginning of the ActM saga pop back in and shed some light on things with the board which stayed behind closed doors or demand more answers. Members and shareholders alike shouldn't withhold the scrutiny. Ive always been wary of optimistic folk here.
The last thing I want to see is this house of cards fold under a curtain of "incompetence." I've said it before and I'll say it again. Where is the accountability, responsibility and transparency of a gentleman from the south much less a CEO of a million dollar start-up?
It's good to see names from the beginning of the ActM saga pop back in and shed some light on things with the board which stayed behind closed doors or demand more answers. Members and shareholders alike shouldn't withhold the scrutiny. Ive always been wary of optimistic folk here.
The last thing I want to see is this house of cards fold under a curtain of "incompetence." I've said it before and I'll say it again. Where is the accountability, responsibility and transparency of a gentleman from the south much less a CEO of a million dollar start-up?
soon to be a deleted post . People don't bother to post in this thread any more, it will be deleted by the CEO whom is busy deleting posts as they come in, he doesn't have anything better to do with his time!!
That's just not true, see this page: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=297503.msg3943732#msg3943732 where SaltySpitoon is talking about how they are moderating this thread and deleting things clearly off topic.
Which is not to say Ken isn't doing that too, just that it's more likely to be a forum mod IMO.
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Does someone have a good master list of people to ignore here?
I've got a few of the big fish on there but don't have time to read everyone to see if they're a moron or not (and there has, on rare occasion been genuinely good discussion that I don't want to miss)
I've got a few of the big fish on there but don't have time to read everyone to see if they're a moron or not (and there has, on rare occasion been genuinely good discussion that I don't want to miss)
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Since tomorrow is Wednesday, should we expect and announcement from Ken. Or does this trend of Wednesday announcements start next week?
Today is Wednesday in all the important places
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
We are in approval process on Crypto-Trade.
Awesome, can't wait.
For what it's worth, I am predicting people will try to offload cheap at the start but it should settle as we get closer to some more good news
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
It's so enjoyable when almost full pages in this thread have 'this user has been ignored' and I don't have to read the drivel.
Question for Ken (little bit of an old one here):
What happened to the talk of hiring a PR guy (I know Streets 2.0 got the axe or stepped down or whatever) to manage all these announcements? Did that get put on the backburner?
Question for Ken (little bit of an old one here):
What happened to the talk of hiring a PR guy (I know Streets 2.0 got the axe or stepped down or whatever) to manage all these announcements? Did that get put on the backburner?
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Originally posted at http://bitell.sinaapp.com/show.php?tid=679 (Chinese)
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
https://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=rankings§ion=teams
Team AMC is currently ranked at #20 in blocks found. Does this mean anything? Change from before?
Team AMC is currently ranked at #20 in blocks found. Does this mean anything? Change from before?
Have now dropped to #24.
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
I'm sorry, but the whole "signed messages" thing has me stymied. I understand the results of signed messages (sending verifiable transactions) but I cannot for the life of me figure out how to do it? I have been using google to try and get some easy to understand information and how-to's about this feature, as I have heard a lot about it for a long time and realize its importance, but the only stuff I can find involves writing in codes and going in to json files etc. which I have no understanding of. Is there a "for dummies" explanation of how to sign messages? something non-programmers might understand?
It should contain;
1. clients that allow this function
2. step by step procedure for signing messages
even the btc wiki on it is way out of my depth.
I'm sure I am not the only one here, ANY help would be greatly appreciated
It should contain;
1. clients that allow this function
2. step by step procedure for signing messages
even the btc wiki on it is way out of my depth.
I'm sure I am not the only one here, ANY help would be greatly appreciated
Sign up at blockchain.info.
Then:
Quote
How can I sign a Bitcoin message?
Please log in to your My Wallet account, navigate to the 'Receive Money' tab, and click the Action option.
https://blockchain.info/Resources/faq/signmessage.pngPlease log in to your My Wallet account, navigate to the 'Receive Money' tab, and click the Action option.
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Is there a described mechanism for transferring shares from BitFunder to Crypto-Stocks?
Sell on BitFunder, buy on Crypto-Stocks. But the consensus is good luck finding a seller on C-S if you are after any kind of volume.
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Is there another way to sign without downloading the entire blockchain like using alternative lite-clients?
http://blockchain.info/ can sign from an address.
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Well after the whole drama with the website design, I'm not overly optimistic about the design of a complex trading system probably created by whoever made the current ActM website.
I think the best option would be to go direct shares (though it makes liquidating shares more difficult), and hire someone to manage this if required.
I think the best option would be to go direct shares (though it makes liquidating shares more difficult), and hire someone to manage this if required.
You've seen this, right? http://mpex.co/
LOL. I think we can at least hit a slightly higher mark than that.
I meant more about the technical design rather than the graphic design. A trading engine with robust security would be quite difficult to engineer I'd imagine, and I'd like to know more about the development of this site before we all jump ship over to it. It's good forward thinking, but the site also has to be extremely secure as we're dealing with finances, and there has to be some concern given to whether this solution would change anything at all for US shareholders.
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
A while back Ken wrote they already had the code for a private exchange, precisely for this reason. I commended him for that, being forward looking (and was ridiculed by many for saying that). Its in this thread. Anyway, e that doesnt change the legal status, selling those shares directly wouldnt be any more legal, unless he registers them first. He might not attract as much attention, but its hardly a fundamental solution.
Well after the whole drama with the website design, I'm not overly optimistic about the design of a complex trading system probably created by whoever made the current ActM website.
I think the best option would be to go direct shares (though it makes liquidating shares more difficult), and hire someone to manage this if required.
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
The Klondikes are 4.5 GH/s * 68 boards = 306 GH/s
Are there any little snippets you can let us in on about the production of the new chips?
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Just a note, that I have had an Interview with Nick of http://thefreebitcoinslist.com/ and VMC will be the first interview on this site when it goes live:
http://thefreebitcoinslist.com/
I think the interview will also be played on BitCast-Radio.com this weekend.
http://thefreebitcoinslist.com/
I think the interview will also be played on BitCast-Radio.com this weekend.
Finally, some PR!
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
Also received my assets on bitfunder. great success
Also got mine which I put through roughly 35 hours ago. Thanks again Ken!