Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 49 results by simoncc
This is the picture of my miner which is hidden after the drawer set under my desk in office.
That is 160Gh per board, and no electricity expenses and internet expenses...
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0356%20%28640x480%29.jpg
That is 160Gh per board, and no electricity expenses and internet expenses...
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0356%20%28640x480%29.jpg
a man either brave? or looking for a reason to get a new job.....
well played well played
in my humble opinion you should just take a miner and put it inside one of those desktop air filter units
something like this
http://www.amazon.com/Holmes-HEPA-Desktop-Purifier-HAP242-UC/dp/B0000DK35B/ref=lp_3737421_1_1?s=home-garden&ie=UTF8&qid=1411462582&sr=1-1
loud as hell maybe...heck you prob could even leave the filter in....gut another vent in back etc
(now I prob did just get someone fired in the future)
also someone back in 2013 found a way to put a BFL 5 gh jally (he did get one ...or the first and prob roi'd on it) found room in his office DESKTOP CASE
had pics etc....don't have the link
heh
I have five BFL 5Gh also. But they are retired, 'cause I can't stand the noise from those little black boxes. So I made my boards with bitfury. I populated 60 bitfury per board, and that was powered by 12V. And more, I chose a old-fashion CPU heatsink with quite fan on that. such that, no more noise are there...
The goal of my desgin was to have them under my desk in office, and have them to increase my salary...
This is the picture of my miner which is hidden after the drawer set under my desk in office.
That is 160Gh per board, and no electricity expenses and internet expenses...
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0356%20%28640x480%29.jpg
That is 160Gh per board, and no electricity expenses and internet expenses...
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0356%20%28640x480%29.jpg
vs3, quick question: why do the bitfurys in the nf6 design not run at their top frequency (6x3.5 = 21GH vs ~12.5GH)?
The throughput of SPI on MCP2210 is the factor of the hash rate
(the buffer size on MCP2210 is too short to feed a job to a bitfury in one transmission. Two transmissions are always needed. And more, the gap between two transmissions is another issue
....
you would see also this in the source code:
In what file? I get 0 results when try to find in cgminer-4.3.3 repository.you would see also this in the source code:
/* Identify number of chips, and use it in device name if it can fit
* into 3 chars, otherwise use generic NFU name. */
val = sscanf(bitfury->usbdev->prod_string, "NanoFury NF%u ", &info->chips);
https://github.com/ckolivas/cgminer/search?q=generic+NFU+name&ref=cmdform
Code:
if (opt_debug) {
struct gpio_pin gp;
mcp2210_get_gpio_pindirs(bitfury, &gp);
struct gpio_pin gp;
mcp2210_get_gpio_pindirs(bitfury, &gp);
EDIT: no occurence of "generic NFU name" in any file... Searched by notepad++ in all files...
It's just updated hours ago. I guess it's not ready for next rev. package. You should go to github to get the latest source.
I've added support for NF2 and NF6 into cgminer git master branch. I'm not getting much love out of the NF6 just yet but they may well need so much power that even a regular USB3 port is not enough. The NF2s are behaving very nicely. This is at --nfu-bits 54:
Code:
14: NF2 00001099: | 4.670G / 4.655Gh/s WU: 65.2/m
23: NF2 00000753: | 4.447G / 4.509Gh/s WU: 63.6/m
23: NF2 00000753: | 4.447G / 4.509Gh/s WU: 63.6/m
NFU??
I meant the identity was changed. that's great. not for NF1 only, but for MCP2210 based devices... great thing
I've added support for NF2 and NF6 into cgminer git master branch. I'm not getting much love out of the NF6 just yet but they may well need so much power that even a regular USB3 port is not enough. The NF2s are behaving very nicely. This is at --nfu-bits 54:
Code:
14: NF2 00001099: | 4.670G / 4.655Gh/s WU: 65.2/m
23: NF2 00000753: | 4.447G / 4.509Gh/s WU: 63.6/m
23: NF2 00000753: | 4.447G / 4.509Gh/s WU: 63.6/m
NFU??
One day someone there asked me one question "How to chain NF2s together and access them by one USB interface?"
I had a look at my NF2 board, and found out how to do that. Let me show you the picture:
WARNING HERE: I HAVE TO SAY ONE THING THAT I DO NOT REALIZE NF2 CHAIN HERE BECAUSE I HAVE ONLY ONE
BF2. SO YOU CAN TAKE THIS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. NO GUARANTEE AGAINST DESTROYING DEVICES...https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/nf2-chain.jpg
1. unsolder the parts in orange rectanges on 2nd NF2. ( 1st NF2 does not need any modified, only 4 flying wires later...)
2. there are 4 red circle on 1st NF2, and there are 4 blue circle on 2nd NF2. Connect red 1 to blue 1, R2 to B2, R3 to B3,
and R4 to B4 by flying wires. Note: make sure wires 1 2 3 are the same length.
3. if you want to chain the 3rd NF2, unsolder the parts on 3rd NF2, and connect Red circles on 2nd NF2 to Blue circles on 3rd NF2,
and so on...
4. if you plug these chained NF2 to the same USB hub, GND plan should be the same. No GND wire should jump each other.
Yellow circle in the picture is GND point I use.
AGAIN HERE:
WARNING HERE: I HAVE TO SAY ONE THING THAT I DO NOT REALIZE NF2 CHAIN HERE BECAUSE I HAVE ONLY ONE
BF2. SO YOU CAN TAKE THIS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. NO GUARANTEE AGAINST DESTROYING DEVICES...
You do not populate the parts in oragne rectangles on the rest 7 NF2 boards if you
have DIY kit from vs3... and you can save a little bit of money by this.
I had a look at my NF2 board, and found out how to do that. Let me show you the picture:
WARNING HERE: I HAVE TO SAY ONE THING THAT I DO NOT REALIZE NF2 CHAIN HERE BECAUSE I HAVE ONLY ONE
BF2. SO YOU CAN TAKE THIS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. NO GUARANTEE AGAINST DESTROYING DEVICES...https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/nf2-chain.jpg
1. unsolder the parts in orange rectanges on 2nd NF2. ( 1st NF2 does not need any modified, only 4 flying wires later...)
2. there are 4 red circle on 1st NF2, and there are 4 blue circle on 2nd NF2. Connect red 1 to blue 1, R2 to B2, R3 to B3,
and R4 to B4 by flying wires. Note: make sure wires 1 2 3 are the same length.
3. if you want to chain the 3rd NF2, unsolder the parts on 3rd NF2, and connect Red circles on 2nd NF2 to Blue circles on 3rd NF2,
and so on...
4. if you plug these chained NF2 to the same USB hub, GND plan should be the same. No GND wire should jump each other.
Yellow circle in the picture is GND point I use.
AGAIN HERE:
WARNING HERE: I HAVE TO SAY ONE THING THAT I DO NOT REALIZE NF2 CHAIN HERE BECAUSE I HAVE ONLY ONE
BF2. SO YOU CAN TAKE THIS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. NO GUARANTEE AGAINST DESTROYING DEVICES...
You do not populate the parts in oragne rectangles on the rest 7 NF2 boards if you
have DIY kit from vs3... and you can save a little bit of money by this.
Re: [Ordered] Rev. 2 Bitfury Bare Chips - (Up to 3.8 Gh/s) - 384 chips for sale
have the chips been shipped out yet ??
JT
JT
Most packages should have shipped by today. Tehre are 1 or two where I am still making arrangements with the buyers.
I have a few hundred left that I am selling if anyone still wants to buy some.
well, I do not get the tracking PM yet...
I hope the NF* variants have a unique identifier on USB to make them easy to distinguish on USB.
The nanofury currently nicely identifies itself as:
The nanofury currently nicely identifies itself as:
Code:
iProduct 2 NanoFury NF1 v0.7
Managing variant devices is much easier when some forethought goes into it by the hardware devs thanks I can send you my code if you like. I modified cgminer 4.2.3 for NFx already.
I get the number of chips by finding "NFx" where x is for chips, i.e. NF1 for 1 chip, NF2 for 2,
NF3 for 3,...NF5 for 5, NF6 for 6...and so on...
The freq of all chips are the same. I have no idea to add an optional to set different freq for each
chip. As the picture I showed that is tested on "NF3".
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0226.JPG
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0227.JPG
Later, I will show NF5...
First - CONGRATS! :-) Nicely done!
And that's exactly why those 3 extra test points are there and how they were meant to be used
Oh - and I think that's the first case when I see someone adding a 40mm fan
(which was another one of the other design considerations)Just a word of caution - I see that you're powering the 3rd chip from the same power regulator - be aware that the regulator is rated for 6Amps so if you push the chips a bit too much you may exhaust it. (nothing scary is going to happen - just some serious voltage ripples which will mess with bitfury's internal clock generator and you'll see very low hashing speed and lots of errors)
As for the NFx numbering - that is correct, the "x" was meant to indicate the number of chips. This is all part of the "product string", which is a customizable element.
Luke's bfgminer looks for the text "NanoFury" and that's how it decides to do any further tests with that USB device. There is also an additional test that checks the device (a hardware check). The NFx part is not mandatory for bfgminer, but I've been adding it anyways for consistency.
I've been using the https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury_Init program for setting the "product string".
The product string can be up to 25 characters long, and I've been adding manufacturer-specific identifiers after the NFx part (e.g. "NanoFury NF2 v0.5 by MLM").
I don't know if any of those strings have been used by cgminer and how it detects the devices (although I could probably take a look at the code and figure it out).
There is one addition that I've asked Luke to add but it is not there yet - I want to add a "default speed" indicator, which will be in the form of "/N" after the NFx part - e.g.
"NanoFury NF2/t" where the letter will represent the default speed, calculated by the formula 30+modifier, where upper-case letters are negative (@=0, A=-1, B=-2, etc) and lowercase are positive (a=+1, b=+2, c=+3, etc), and in this case t=20 so that's default speed 30+20=50 bits.
And the speed designator can be one for all chips, or one for each chip - e.g. if I have 2 chips and if the first should default to 48 bits and the second to 50 the example would be "NanoFury NF2/rt" ("r" is 18+30=48 bits for the first chip, "t" is 20+30=50 bits for the second).
I realize that this has a limitation and will work for individual settings of up to 12 chips, but for anything with that many chips it may just be sufficient to have one default speed for all chips.
Also, there will be one more hardware change specific to the NF6 design - I need an inverse PWRON signal (where ON=0 and OFF=1 or input state) and I need the signal inverted so that I don't have to put an extra transistor (and the signal that is currently in the code is not inverse = ON=1 and OFF=0).
Currently there is no power control and all chips start working and consuming power the moment you plug them in the USB
And that will probably be the only notable difference in v0.2 of the board (plus moving some stuff around).
@simoncc - I know I'm repeating what's already said but could you please share your multi-chip version of the code?
I'll be messing with Luke's code tomorrow and want to try cgminer as well
I put my code at this : https://github.com/capricorner/cgminer
About the number of chips and frequency in MCP2210 product string, that was added already. For example, "NanoFury NF2/E v0.5 by MLM"
stands for 2 chips by freq 54. the token in the product string is "NFx/y" or "NFx-y", x is for the number of chips ( 1~99 ), and y is for the number
of frequency ( A ~ F ==> A for 50, B for 51... E for 54, and F for 55 ).
I believe there must be some issues in the code and I will try to fix them ( I found several tonight...)
I hope the NF* variants have a unique identifier on USB to make them easy to distinguish on USB.
The nanofury currently nicely identifies itself as:
The nanofury currently nicely identifies itself as:
Code:
iProduct 2 NanoFury NF1 v0.7
Managing variant devices is much easier when some forethought goes into it by the hardware devs thanks I can send you my code if you like. I modified cgminer 4.2.3 for NFx already.
I get the number of chips by finding "NFx" where x is for chips, i.e. NF1 for 1 chip, NF2 for 2,
NF3 for 3,...NF5 for 5, NF6 for 6...and so on...
The freq of all chips are the same. I have no idea to add an optional to set different freq for each
chip. As the picture I showed that is tested on "NF3".
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0226.JPG
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0227.JPG
Later, I will show NF5...
First - CONGRATS! :-) Nicely done!
And that's exactly why those 3 extra test points are there and how they were meant to be used
Oh - and I think that's the first case when I see someone adding a 40mm fan
(which was another one of the other design considerations)Just a word of caution - I see that you're powering the 3rd chip from the same power regulator - be aware that the regulator is rated for 6Amps so if you push the chips a bit too much you may exhaust it. (nothing scary is going to happen - just some serious voltage ripples which will mess with bitfury's internal clock generator and you'll see very low hashing speed and lots of errors)
As for the NFx numbering - that is correct, the "x" was meant to indicate the number of chips. This is all part of the "product string", which is a customizable element.
Luke's bfgminer looks for the text "NanoFury" and that's how it decides to do any further tests with that USB device. There is also an additional test that checks the device (a hardware check). The NFx part is not mandatory for bfgminer, but I've been adding it anyways for consistency.
I've been using the https://github.com/nanofury/NanoFury_Init program for setting the "product string".
The product string can be up to 25 characters long, and I've been adding manufacturer-specific identifiers after the NFx part (e.g. "NanoFury NF2 v0.5 by MLM").
I don't know if any of those strings have been used by cgminer and how it detects the devices (although I could probably take a look at the code and figure it out).
There is one addition that I've asked Luke to add but it is not there yet - I want to add a "default speed" indicator, which will be in the form of "/N" after the NFx part - e.g.
"NanoFury NF2/t" where the letter will represent the default speed, calculated by the formula 30+modifier, where upper-case letters are negative (@=0, A=-1, B=-2, etc) and lowercase are positive (a=+1, b=+2, c=+3, etc), and in this case t=20 so that's default speed 30+20=50 bits.
And the speed designator can be one for all chips, or one for each chip - e.g. if I have 2 chips and if the first should default to 48 bits and the second to 50 the example would be "NanoFury NF2/rt" ("r" is 18+30=48 bits for the first chip, "t" is 20+30=50 bits for the second).
I realize that this has a limitation and will work for individual settings of up to 12 chips, but for anything with that many chips it may just be sufficient to have one default speed for all chips.
Also, there will be one more hardware change specific to the NF6 design - I need an inverse PWRON signal (where ON=0 and OFF=1 or input state) and I need the signal inverted so that I don't have to put an extra transistor (and the signal that is currently in the code is not inverse = ON=1 and OFF=0).
Currently there is no power control and all chips start working and consuming power the moment you plug them in the USB
And that will probably be the only notable difference in v0.2 of the board (plus moving some stuff around).
@simoncc - I know I'm repeating what's already said but could you please share your multi-chip version of the code?
I'll be messing with Luke's code tomorrow and want to try cgminer as well
Hi vs3,
1. About freq issue, your ideal is good. I will modify my code to solve this issue.
2. After modifying and finishing test simply, I put my code into public.
3. Regulator on NF2 seems supporting 3 chips and working well. I had made them working for +10hrs last week, and found the heat-sink was very hot. That's why I put a 5V 4-cm FAN on the heat-sink. After that, it's quite cool now.
simoncc
I hope the NF* variants have a unique identifier on USB to make them easy to distinguish on USB.
The nanofury currently nicely identifies itself as:
The nanofury currently nicely identifies itself as:
Code:
iProduct 2 NanoFury NF1 v0.7
Managing variant devices is much easier when some forethought goes into it by the hardware devs thanks I can send you my code if you like. I modified cgminer 4.2.3 for NFx already.
I get the number of chips by finding "NFx" where x is for chips, i.e. NF1 for 1 chip, NF2 for 2,
NF3 for 3,...NF5 for 5, NF6 for 6...and so on...
The freq of all chips are the same. I have no idea to add an optional to set different freq for each
chip. As the picture I showed that is tested on "NF3".
Later, I will show NF5...
I would be intrested in the code if youd like to share it, id like to test it on the h-card-usb thing.
Just point me where i have o change the numbers.
Thanks
Download this tool to modify the product string of MCP2210 : http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/MCP2210Utility_v1.2.1.zip
Read, modify and configure... quite easy. If you use zadig to access MCP2210, you have to remove/uninstall it and change to windows default HID driver such that microchip can access MCP2210 correctly. I will put my source to github here tonight, 'cause that is at home, not in office.
I hope the NF* variants have a unique identifier on USB to make them easy to distinguish on USB.
The nanofury currently nicely identifies itself as:
The nanofury currently nicely identifies itself as:
Code:
iProduct 2 NanoFury NF1 v0.7
Managing variant devices is much easier when some forethought goes into it by the hardware devs thanks I can send you my code if you like. I modified cgminer 4.2.3 for NFx already.
I get the number of chips by finding "NFx" where x is for chips, i.e. NF1 for 1 chip, NF2 for 2,
NF3 for 3,...NF5 for 5, NF6 for 6...and so on...
The freq of all chips are the same. I have no idea to add an optional to set different freq for each
chip. As the picture I showed that is tested on "NF3".
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0226.JPG
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0227.JPG
Later, I will show NF5...
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/cgminer-bitfury-3chips.png
3-chipped NanoFury (NF3!?)
I will post 5-chipped picture later...
3-chipped NanoFury (NF3!?)
I will post 5-chipped picture later...
I figured out what was wrong with the 6th chip :-)
bfgminer version 3.99.0 - Started: [2014-04-05 02:07:05] - [ 0 days 00:09:16]
Manage devices Pool management Settings Display options
Connected to stratum.mining.eligius.st diff 16 with stratum as user
Block: ...484af8b3 #294330 Diff:5.01G (35.84Ph/s) Started: [02:14:47]
ST:8 F:0 NB:3 AS:0 BW:[203/ 27 B/s] E:20.23 I:40.96uBTC/hr BS:1.72k
1/6 | 9.72/ 9.55/10.65Gh/s | A:75 R:2+0(2.6%) HW:43/3.0%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NFY 0a: | 1.64/ 1.66/ 1.77Gh/s | A:17 R:1+0(5.6%) HW: 6/2.4%
NFY 0b: | 1.64/ 1.65/ 1.91Gh/s | A:12 R:0+0(none) HW:14/4.7%
NFY 0c: | 1.53/ 1.54/ 1.59Gh/s | A:10 R:1+0(9.1%) HW:15/6.4%
NFY 0d: | 1.57/ 1.61/ 1.66Gh/s | A:11 R:0+0(none) HW: 4/1.9%
NFY 0e: | 1.64/ 1.66/ 1.83Gh/s | A:12 R:0+0(none) HW: 5/2.1%
NFY 0f: | 1.68/ 1.70/ 1.83Gh/s | A:15 R:0+0(none) HW: 0/none
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0c1ee27c NFY 0c Diff 21/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 099ab634 NFY 0d Diff 26/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0c06c938 NFY 0d Diff 21/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0d599353 NFY 0e Diff 19/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:54] Accepted 0ce9c358 NFY 0e Diff 19/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:57] Accepted 0826a4eb NFY 0b Diff 31/16
[2014-04-05 02:13:05] Accepted 047c994e NFY 0a Diff 57/16
[2014-04-05 02:13:06] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update
[2014-04-05 02:13:10] Accepted 0dae182d NFY 0e Diff 18/16
I'll have to try with a different hub tomorrow as this one is quite crappy (at 1.15A dropping down to 3.9V).
bfgminer version 3.99.0 - Started: [2014-04-05 02:07:05] - [ 0 days 00:09:16]
Manage devices Pool management Settings Display options
Connected to stratum.mining.eligius.st diff 16 with stratum as user
Block: ...484af8b3 #294330 Diff:5.01G (35.84Ph/s) Started: [02:14:47]
ST:8 F:0 NB:3 AS:0 BW:[203/ 27 B/s] E:20.23 I:40.96uBTC/hr BS:1.72k
1/6 | 9.72/ 9.55/10.65Gh/s | A:75 R:2+0(2.6%) HW:43/3.0%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NFY 0a: | 1.64/ 1.66/ 1.77Gh/s | A:17 R:1+0(5.6%) HW: 6/2.4%
NFY 0b: | 1.64/ 1.65/ 1.91Gh/s | A:12 R:0+0(none) HW:14/4.7%
NFY 0c: | 1.53/ 1.54/ 1.59Gh/s | A:10 R:1+0(9.1%) HW:15/6.4%
NFY 0d: | 1.57/ 1.61/ 1.66Gh/s | A:11 R:0+0(none) HW: 4/1.9%
NFY 0e: | 1.64/ 1.66/ 1.83Gh/s | A:12 R:0+0(none) HW: 5/2.1%
NFY 0f: | 1.68/ 1.70/ 1.83Gh/s | A:15 R:0+0(none) HW: 0/none
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0c1ee27c NFY 0c Diff 21/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 099ab634 NFY 0d Diff 26/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0c06c938 NFY 0d Diff 21/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0d599353 NFY 0e Diff 19/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:54] Accepted 0ce9c358 NFY 0e Diff 19/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:57] Accepted 0826a4eb NFY 0b Diff 31/16
[2014-04-05 02:13:05] Accepted 047c994e NFY 0a Diff 57/16
[2014-04-05 02:13:06] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update
[2014-04-05 02:13:10] Accepted 0dae182d NFY 0e Diff 18/16
I'll have to try with a different hub tomorrow as this one is quite crappy (at 1.15A dropping down to 3.9V).
I have ever tried 5-chipped NFx. (NF5?!) last week with bfgminer and gotten 12+G/h. But I forgot to take a picture to show what I said...sorry.
I do not use any hub, but use a kit I made. It's simple and works.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0223.JPG
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/23682587/DSC_0222.JPG
I figured out what was wrong with the 6th chip :-)
bfgminer version 3.99.0 - Started: [2014-04-05 02:07:05] - [ 0 days 00:09:16]
Manage devices Pool management Settings Display options
Connected to stratum.mining.eligius.st diff 16 with stratum as user
Block: ...484af8b3 #294330 Diff:5.01G (35.84Ph/s) Started: [02:14:47]
ST:8 F:0 NB:3 AS:0 BW:[203/ 27 B/s] E:20.23 I:40.96uBTC/hr BS:1.72k
1/6 | 9.72/ 9.55/10.65Gh/s | A:75 R:2+0(2.6%) HW:43/3.0%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NFY 0a: | 1.64/ 1.66/ 1.77Gh/s | A:17 R:1+0(5.6%) HW: 6/2.4%
NFY 0b: | 1.64/ 1.65/ 1.91Gh/s | A:12 R:0+0(none) HW:14/4.7%
NFY 0c: | 1.53/ 1.54/ 1.59Gh/s | A:10 R:1+0(9.1%) HW:15/6.4%
NFY 0d: | 1.57/ 1.61/ 1.66Gh/s | A:11 R:0+0(none) HW: 4/1.9%
NFY 0e: | 1.64/ 1.66/ 1.83Gh/s | A:12 R:0+0(none) HW: 5/2.1%
NFY 0f: | 1.68/ 1.70/ 1.83Gh/s | A:15 R:0+0(none) HW: 0/none
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0c1ee27c NFY 0c Diff 21/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 099ab634 NFY 0d Diff 26/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0c06c938 NFY 0d Diff 21/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0d599353 NFY 0e Diff 19/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:54] Accepted 0ce9c358 NFY 0e Diff 19/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:57] Accepted 0826a4eb NFY 0b Diff 31/16
[2014-04-05 02:13:05] Accepted 047c994e NFY 0a Diff 57/16
[2014-04-05 02:13:06] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update
[2014-04-05 02:13:10] Accepted 0dae182d NFY 0e Diff 18/16
I'll have to try with a different hub tomorrow as this one is quite crappy (at 1.15A dropping down to 3.9V).
bfgminer version 3.99.0 - Started: [2014-04-05 02:07:05] - [ 0 days 00:09:16]
Manage devices Pool management Settings Display options
Connected to stratum.mining.eligius.st diff 16 with stratum as user
Block: ...484af8b3 #294330 Diff:5.01G (35.84Ph/s) Started: [02:14:47]
ST:8 F:0 NB:3 AS:0 BW:[203/ 27 B/s] E:20.23 I:40.96uBTC/hr BS:1.72k
1/6 | 9.72/ 9.55/10.65Gh/s | A:75 R:2+0(2.6%) HW:43/3.0%
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NFY 0a: | 1.64/ 1.66/ 1.77Gh/s | A:17 R:1+0(5.6%) HW: 6/2.4%
NFY 0b: | 1.64/ 1.65/ 1.91Gh/s | A:12 R:0+0(none) HW:14/4.7%
NFY 0c: | 1.53/ 1.54/ 1.59Gh/s | A:10 R:1+0(9.1%) HW:15/6.4%
NFY 0d: | 1.57/ 1.61/ 1.66Gh/s | A:11 R:0+0(none) HW: 4/1.9%
NFY 0e: | 1.64/ 1.66/ 1.83Gh/s | A:12 R:0+0(none) HW: 5/2.1%
NFY 0f: | 1.68/ 1.70/ 1.83Gh/s | A:15 R:0+0(none) HW: 0/none
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0c1ee27c NFY 0c Diff 21/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 099ab634 NFY 0d Diff 26/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0c06c938 NFY 0d Diff 21/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:52] Accepted 0d599353 NFY 0e Diff 19/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:54] Accepted 0ce9c358 NFY 0e Diff 19/16
[2014-04-05 02:12:57] Accepted 0826a4eb NFY 0b Diff 31/16
[2014-04-05 02:13:05] Accepted 047c994e NFY 0a Diff 57/16
[2014-04-05 02:13:06] Stratum from pool 0 requested work update
[2014-04-05 02:13:10] Accepted 0dae182d NFY 0e Diff 18/16
I'll have to try with a different hub tomorrow as this one is quite crappy (at 1.15A dropping down to 3.9V).
I have ever tried 5-chipped NFx. (NF5?!) last week with bfgminer and gotten 12+G/h. But I forgot to take a picture to show what I said...sorry.
Here is a NanoFury Sixer teaser :-)
http://i.imgur.com/35uCTijl.png
Now the most annoying and nail-biting part begins ... waiting for the real boards to arrive ...
http://i.imgur.com/35uCTijl.png
Now the most annoying and nail-biting part begins ... waiting for the real boards to arrive ...
String-liked NF6?
Got the boards and stencils!
And all I can say is - WOW! They're actually a much higher quality than what I expected!
http://i.imgur.com/0MnMpjIm.jpg
And all I can say is - WOW! They're actually a much higher quality than what I expected!
http://i.imgur.com/0MnMpjIm.jpg
Care to share from where? Hard to read the package.
To be absolutely honest - I have no clue where they got made!
I asked one of the companies that did assembly for a previous run to get me some extra boards and a stencil and that's what I got. What I suspect is that they're ordering those things from the far east somewhere (as it took a few weeks). I'm not complaining though - the quality was worth the price I paid and the wait.
I'll give them a call tomorrow to see if I can find out more details though.
Re: Introducing OneString miners - March 12 price reduction: ~12%
The price here is OK for me. Actually, you can see my picture showing my miners. If you want to have a cheaper mining cost(including miner, power, and ISP
), how do you depress/decrease the cost? About me, my answer is shown in that picture. Guess: where are they?
