Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 1,004 results by sorry2xs
network diff. is constantly changing so when network diff. is high valid shares are very diff. to find, earnings decrease and that is the variance in earnings 
https://explorer.zcha.in monitor this site and see for your self
https://explorer.zcha.in monitor this site and see for your self Anyone else notice that v12/12.1 is reporting about a 5% higher hashrate than pool(flypool) for polaris based cards?
For example a 470 is reporting 280H/s miner side, and 260H/s poolside average. With 2% fee should be reporting ~275H/s.
Can anyone else on flypool with polaris cards confirm...want to see if its just me or a pool related issue.
[/quote1.8 kH/s 1.6 kH/s 480s ref.
For example a 470 is reporting 280H/s miner side, and 260H/s poolside average. With 2% fee should be reporting ~275H/s.
Can anyone else on flypool with polaris cards confirm...want to see if its just me or a pool related issue.
[/quote1.8 kH/s 1.6 kH/s 480s ref.
Yeah Fury needs to be on older drivers...if you have newer ones, then I think V10 is the best, with 395 sol/s. Nice speed increase for 390s and 280x, although after fees its pretty similar to optiminer. Should we expect another update soon ? I have some trouble to get optimum speeds with tongas, optiminer gets better results at 225-230 sol/s so far. Maybe i'm missing something.
Yeah I did not concentrate on tonga cards.
I can reach 430H/s on stock 390X. Or I can try to add Pascal coin to dual miner, or improve CryptoNight miner. Need to select.
just switch to optiminer, at least for now
Optiminer sucks for recent cards like the 4xx
Quote
"solution_rate" : {
"GPU0" : {
"3600s" : 297.62916666666666,
"5s" : 289,
"60s" : 295.56666666666666
},
"GPU1" : {
"3600s" : 295.75083333333333,
"5s" : 307,
"60s" : 296.5
},
"GPU2" : {
"3600s" : 290.90055555555557,
"5s" : 285.39999999999998,
"60s" : 290.58333333333331
},
"GPU3" : {
"3600s" : 291.30250000000001,
"5s" : 296.19999999999999,
"60s" : 289.08333333333331
},
"GPU4" : {
"3600s" : 290.95138888888891,
"5s" : 297.19999999999999,
"60s" : 290.13333333333333
},
"Total" : {
"3600s" : 1466.3077777777778,
"5s" : 1476.5999999999999,
"60s" : 1461.9166666666667
}
"GPU0" : {
"3600s" : 297.62916666666666,
"5s" : 289,
"60s" : 295.56666666666666
},
"GPU1" : {
"3600s" : 295.75083333333333,
"5s" : 307,
"60s" : 296.5
},
"GPU2" : {
"3600s" : 290.90055555555557,
"5s" : 285.39999999999998,
"60s" : 290.58333333333331
},
"GPU3" : {
"3600s" : 291.30250000000001,
"5s" : 296.19999999999999,
"60s" : 289.08333333333331
},
"GPU4" : {
"3600s" : 290.95138888888891,
"5s" : 297.19999999999999,
"60s" : 290.13333333333333
},
"Total" : {
"3600s" : 1466.3077777777778,
"5s" : 1476.5999999999999,
"60s" : 1461.9166666666667
}
Just quoting Optiminer's GitHub:
Quote
Windows
Full speed can only be achieved under Catalyst 15.12 drivers! See below for how to install the older driver version.
RX4*0 cards are not supported by Catalyst 15.12, I strongly recommend to use linux for mining on them!
Full speed can only be achieved under Catalyst 15.12 drivers! See below for how to install the older driver version.
RX4*0 cards are not supported by Catalyst 15.12, I strongly recommend to use linux for mining on them!
I use Windows, therefore Optiminer is not a very good option, according to them!