Search content
Sort by
Showing 13 of 13 results by spherix
Re: [ANN][VTC] Vertcoin - Adaptive N-factor in Scrypt - No more ASICs
Ok I just hatcheted this together for a reference point.
30VTC For best #betterthanbitcoin meme. Will put it to a vote.
This is not a winner!
But you get the idea, and if someone want to make this concept prettier I kinda like the reference...bought a lot of platinum futures last week when I wasn't busy flippin' bits for verts.
http://i.imgur.com/6owG500.png
PS- For the FB posts from yesterday, whilst you didn't follow directions exactly I have the list and will send out in the next couple hours, my social media people explained that I would be better off buying some good crack to smoke with the money than the rent a page scheme so I bowed to their wisdom. I do appreciate your enthusiasm though and it was helpful to see the idea implemented for perspective.
30VTC For best #betterthanbitcoin meme. Will put it to a vote.
This is not a winner!
But you get the idea, and if someone want to make this concept prettier I kinda like the reference...bought a lot of platinum futures last week when I wasn't busy flippin' bits for verts.
http://i.imgur.com/6owG500.png
PS- For the FB posts from yesterday, whilst you didn't follow directions exactly I have the list and will send out in the next couple hours, my social media people explained that I would be better off buying some good crack to smoke with the money than the rent a page scheme so I bowed to their wisdom. I do appreciate your enthusiasm though and it was helpful to see the idea implemented for perspective.
I like this idea
Any takers?
I bumped to 30VTC first place
20VTC second place
10VTC third place.
You can post them here and the vertcoin facebook page if mods are cool with it.
https://facebook.com/vertcoin
here's my first try
http://users.telenet.be/cdesign/Vertcoin.jpg
Re: [ANN] cudaMiner - a new litecoin mining application [Windows/Linux]
Quote from: cbuchner1
Question of the day: What to mine with my nVidia cards?
Yacoin -> this coin is falling (failing?)
MRC -> no luck with solo mining at all. Trying a pool now (mrc.easy-mining.net pool seems to be fixed at last).
VertCoin -> who is currently into this coin? if you are, why?
middlecoin -> the DOGE rush is over, right?
I think what would really be helpful is a profitability calculator for various scrypt-jane coins, taking one's hash rate at different N-factors into account.
Christian
Yacoin -> this coin is falling (failing?)
MRC -> no luck with solo mining at all. Trying a pool now (mrc.easy-mining.net pool seems to be fixed at last).
VertCoin -> who is currently into this coin? if you are, why?
middlecoin -> the DOGE rush is over, right?
I think what would really be helpful is a profitability calculator for various scrypt-jane coins, taking one's hash rate at different N-factors into account.
Christian
may'be a late response , but have a try at http://hashbros.co.in.
here is their official thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=431140.0
i'm in no way associated with them.
Have just been using for a week now , and must say i'm very happy with it.
similar to middlecoin ,hashcows ,...
but with a very good website , transparent in every way.
and my profits are well above with what i had with middlecoin.
kind regards
Re: [ANN] KRAKEN.COM - Exchange Now Open with USD, EUR, BTC, LTC, XRP, NMC
Hi,
concerning account & withdrawals.
On the 'WIthdrawal Page' it states
"Important: The name on the bank account you are withdrawing to must match the name on the account you are withdrawing from."
Does the name have to be a 100% match ? or do you check manually , and when it resembles is ok ?
If it has to be a 100% match , is there a way to get it changed ?
When i verified tier 2 , i switched the order first & last name.
And Iused my calling name , instead of my exact name on my passport.
like rob instead of robert
kind regards.
concerning account & withdrawals.
On the 'WIthdrawal Page' it states
"Important: The name on the bank account you are withdrawing to must match the name on the account you are withdrawing from."
Does the name have to be a 100% match ? or do you check manually , and when it resembles is ok ?
If it has to be a 100% match , is there a way to get it changed ?
When i verified tier 2 , i switched the order first & last name.
And Iused my calling name , instead of my exact name on my passport.
like rob instead of robert
kind regards.
Re: [ANN][MULTI] HashBros Beta [OPTIONAL-PS][VD][1-1.5%][PPLNS]
Hi,
Being a very small miner , I like the pool very much.
I hope the earnings will stay like this or better , when the mega-hashers will join.
would an api be possible for earnings ?
It seems that 'my earnings' on the dashboard do not correspond
to the earnings per round on the 'earnings' page
kind regards
Being a very small miner , I like the pool very much.
I hope the earnings will stay like this or better , when the mega-hashers will join.
would an api be possible for earnings ?
It seems that 'my earnings' on the dashboard do not correspond
to the earnings per round on the 'earnings' page
kind regards
hi,
i am using the API as is now.
But i'm noticing what seems to be a bug.
The return per coin is something like this :
,"cap":{"confirmed_rewards":"0","hashrate":"0","estimated_rewards":"0","payout_history":"0","pool_hashrate":4111,"round_shares":false,"block_shares":"57874715"}
I think estimated_rewards is supposed to be filled with 'Per-block estimate'
but it seems that estimated_rewards is filled with the value from
Per-Block Estimate when that value > 0.
but when Per-Block Estimate = 0 , then it is filled with the value from unconfirmed.
It would be great if it would always be filled in the same way and an extra field for the unconfirmed
or have 2 extra fields in the api-return : unconfirmed_rewards & block_estimate.
kind regards,
spherix
i am using the API as is now.
But i'm noticing what seems to be a bug.
The return per coin is something like this :
,"cap":{"confirmed_rewards":"0","hashrate":"0","estimated_rewards":"0","payout_history":"0","pool_hashrate":4111,"round_shares":false,"block_shares":"57874715"}
I think estimated_rewards is supposed to be filled with 'Per-block estimate'
but it seems that estimated_rewards is filled with the value from
Per-Block Estimate when that value > 0.
but when Per-Block Estimate = 0 , then it is filled with the value from unconfirmed.
It would be great if it would always be filled in the same way and an extra field for the unconfirmed
or have 2 extra fields in the api-return : unconfirmed_rewards & block_estimate.
kind regards,
spherix
hi,
@ multipool admins
i am using the api as is now.
But i'm noticing what seems to be a bug.
The return per coin is something like this :
,"cap":{"confirmed_rewards":"0","hashrate":"0","estimated_rewards":"0","payout_history":"0","pool_hashrate":4111,"round_shares":false,"block_shares":"57874715"}
but it seems that estimated_rewards is filled with the value from
Per-Block Estimate when that value > 0.
but when Per-Block Estimate = 0 , then it is filled with the value from unconfirmed.
It would be great if it would always be filled in the same way and an extra field for the unconfirmed
or have 2 extra fields in the api-return : unconfirmed_rewards & block_estimate.
kind regards,
spherix
@ multipool admins
i am using the api as is now.
But i'm noticing what seems to be a bug.
The return per coin is something like this :
,"cap":{"confirmed_rewards":"0","hashrate":"0","estimated_rewards":"0","payout_history":"0","pool_hashrate":4111,"round_shares":false,"block_shares":"57874715"}
but it seems that estimated_rewards is filled with the value from
Per-Block Estimate when that value > 0.
but when Per-Block Estimate = 0 , then it is filled with the value from unconfirmed.
It would be great if it would always be filled in the same way and an extra field for the unconfirmed
or have 2 extra fields in the api-return : unconfirmed_rewards & block_estimate.
kind regards,
spherix