Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 31 results by sreg0r
Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (8 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher
The default intensities that Alexis78 use are much higher than other ccminer forks, you can try lowering them but from my experience changing over to ccminerTpruvot has been the most stable with minimal drop in hashrate (<5%).
Thank you guys. Great pointers in the right direction 
I guess different cards in the same machine works on alexis but not the same type.. not only me having a issue whit this.
Random if alexis uses 4 gpus ,5, 2 etc. No crash or any thing like that, you can restart a few times then it suddenly picks up all cards.
Notepad++ works on your files, not notepad in windows.
I guess different cards in the same machine works on alexis but not the same type.. not only me having a issue whit this.
Random if alexis uses 4 gpus ,5, 2 etc. No crash or any thing like that, you can restart a few times then it suddenly picks up all cards.
Notepad++ works on your files, not notepad in windows.
Pretty sure those algos are off by a a factor of one thousand. Real BTC/Day would be 0.00072753
lol ... its really goin crazy
Type: NVIDIA
Miner Algorithm Speed BTC/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
----- --------- ----- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerAlexis78 Quark 177.73 MH/s 0.72753 4.09340 Zpool-
ccminerAlexis78 Qubit 172.46 MH/s 0.64645 3.74846 Zpool-
CcminerTpruvot Qubit 121.15 MH/s 0.45413 3.74846 Zpool-
ccminerAlexis78 X11 72.18 MH/s 0.20790 2.88029 Zpool-
CcminerTpruvot X11 38.27 MH/s 0.11024 2.88029 Zpool-
CcminerTpruvot hmq1725 27.40 MH/s 0.01604 0.58541 Zpool-
Code:
Type: NVIDIA
Miner Algorithm Speed BTC/Day BTC/GH/Day Pool
----- --------- ----- ------- ---------- ----
ccminerAlexis78 Quark 177.73 MH/s 0.72753 4.09340 Zpool-
ccminerAlexis78 Qubit 172.46 MH/s 0.64645 3.74846 Zpool-
CcminerTpruvot Qubit 121.15 MH/s 0.45413 3.74846 Zpool-
ccminerAlexis78 X11 72.18 MH/s 0.20790 2.88029 Zpool-
CcminerTpruvot X11 38.27 MH/s 0.11024 2.88029 Zpool-
CcminerTpruvot hmq1725 27.40 MH/s 0.01604 0.58541 Zpool-
Re: Megaminer - Multi pool (7 pools) / Multi Algo (>20) launcher
Not sure if it's a config issue, but i'm getting a bunch of errors on dual-mining eth/decred
Speed and BTC/Day are both showing blank + PoolWorkers is
Code:
>> TerminatingError(ConvertTo-Hash): "Cannot process argument transformation on parameter 'Hash'. Cannot convert the "System.Object[]" value of type "System.Object[]" to type "System.Double"."
ConvertTo-Hash : Cannot process argument transformation on parameter 'Hash'. Cannot convert the "System.Object[]" value
of type "System.Object[]" to type "System.Double".
At C:\Users\alex\Desktop\Megaminer-3.0\core.ps1:293 char:95
+ ... r.AlgorithmDual -ne $null) {(ConvertTo-Hash ($Miner.HashRate)) + "/s| ...
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (:) [ConvertTo-Hash], ParameterBindingArgumentTransformationException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : ParameterArgumentTransformationError,ConvertTo-Hash
ConvertTo-Hash : Cannot process argument transformation on parameter 'Hash'. Cannot convert the "System.Object[]" value of type "System.Object[]" to type "System.Double".
At C:\Users\alex\Desktop\Megaminer-3.0\core.ps1:293 char:95
+ ... r.AlgorithmDual -ne $null) {(ConvertTo-Hash ($Miner.HashRate)) + "/s| ...
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (:) [ConvertTo-Hash], ParameterBindingArgumentTransformationException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : ParameterArgumentTransformationError,ConvertTo-Hash
ConvertTo-Hash : Cannot process argument transformation on parameter 'Hash'. Cannot convert the "System.Object[]" value
of type "System.Object[]" to type "System.Double".
At C:\Users\alex\Desktop\Megaminer-3.0\core.ps1:293 char:95
+ ... r.AlgorithmDual -ne $null) {(ConvertTo-Hash ($Miner.HashRate)) + "/s| ...
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (:) [ConvertTo-Hash], ParameterBindingArgumentTransformationException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : ParameterArgumentTransformationError,ConvertTo-Hash
ConvertTo-Hash : Cannot process argument transformation on parameter 'Hash'. Cannot convert the "System.Object[]" value of type "System.Object[]" to type "System.Double".
At C:\Users\alex\Desktop\Megaminer-3.0\core.ps1:293 char:95
+ ... r.AlgorithmDual -ne $null) {(ConvertTo-Hash ($Miner.HashRate)) + "/s| ...
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (:) [ConvertTo-Hash], ParameterBindingArgumentTransformationException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : ParameterArgumentTransformationError,ConvertTo-Hash
Speed and BTC/Day are both showing blank + PoolWorkers is
Code:
{$null, $null}
Lyra2v2 is getting "does not validate on CPU!".
Where would I adjust the intensity for this Algo?
Edit: Nevermind, I think I got it. In the $Commands area where it lists all the algos. The extra options are in between quotations.
BTW, why do you use a different miner (ccminer-Natashi and Klaust) for the same Algo (Lyra2RE2)?
Edit 2: I think there is something wrong with the Natashi miner. I commented it out for lyra2v2 and it defaults back to Klaust. It's working now, but slightly slower than Natashi. Slow but creating shares is better than fast and no shares.
Where would I adjust the intensity for this Algo?
Edit: Nevermind, I think I got it. In the $Commands area where it lists all the algos. The extra options are in between quotations.
BTW, why do you use a different miner (ccminer-Natashi and Klaust) for the same Algo (Lyra2RE2)?
Edit 2: I think there is something wrong with the Natashi miner. I commented it out for lyra2v2 and it defaults back to Klaust. It's working now, but slightly slower than Natashi. Slow but creating shares is better than fast and no shares.
It includes multiple miners for the same algos because depending on your hardware one might be faster than the other. I had the Same issue with Natashi so i just disabled it completely.
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][HashTap™][FlexFee™] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
Is it me or is Equihash is defaulting the difficulty to 200?
My 1080 Ti rig is not finding shares at a steady pace. It used to start at 127. Can the default difficulty be lowered, please?
Thanks.
My 1080 Ti rig is not finding shares at a steady pace. It used to start at 127. Can the default difficulty be lowered, please?
Thanks.
I noticed this on my 1080 as well that it is taking quite a long time to find shares at times.
Same issue for me, I read somewhere that 10 shares/min is good to aim for so for my 1070 I've set difficulty to 32. Just set your password to
Code:
c=BTC,stats,d=32
I'm using Nemosminer's script (2.0.5), so I'm not sure where to modify that just for equihash. It looks like it uses a variable for the password, which means it would change it for all of the other algos.
If you open EWBF.ps1 you should see the line
Code:
Arguments = "--api --server $($Pools.(Get-Algorithm($_)).Host) --port 2142 --fee 0 --solver 0 --eexit 1 --user $($Pools.(Get-Algorithm($_)).User) --pass $($Pools.(Get-Algorithm($_)).Pass)$($Commands.$_)"
you should be able to change that to
Code:
Arguments = "--api --server $($Pools.(Get-Algorithm($_)).Host) --port 2142 --fee 0 --solver 0 --eexit 1 --user $($Pools.(Get-Algorithm($_)).User) --pass $($Pools.(Get-Algorithm($_)).Pass)$($Commands.$_),d=32"
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][HashTap™][FlexFee™] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
Is it me or is Equihash is defaulting the difficulty to 200?
My 1080 Ti rig is not finding shares at a steady pace. It used to start at 127. Can the default difficulty be lowered, please?
Thanks.
My 1080 Ti rig is not finding shares at a steady pace. It used to start at 127. Can the default difficulty be lowered, please?
Thanks.
I noticed this on my 1080 as well that it is taking quite a long time to find shares at times.
Same issue for me, I read somewhere that 10 shares/min is good to aim for so for my 1070 I've set difficulty to 32. Just set your password to
Code:
c=BTC,stats,d=32
Thanks for program, but i have some newbie question.
I used to mine with Nicehash and my profit was about 0.0044 (2 x 1080 TI) and now I'm mining with Nemos-miner, but for some weird reason profit on zpool site is lower than that, because it is 0.0039 BTC.
To be honest it's really strange, because according to benchmark profit should be at least 0.005-0.006 BTC per day.
Is it something wrong with zpool site?
Cheers.
I used to mine with Nicehash and my profit was about 0.0044 (2 x 1080 TI) and now I'm mining with Nemos-miner, but for some weird reason profit on zpool site is lower than that, because it is 0.0039 BTC.
To be honest it's really strange, because according to benchmark profit should be at least 0.005-0.006 BTC per day.
Is it something wrong with zpool site?
Cheers.
The profitability of mining goes down every day as difficultly increases, you should expect to make less money with each passing week.
The only fair way to compare services would be too mine on each with identical hardware during the same time frame. Most altcoins are ridiculously volatile and it's hard to account for that when comparing nicehash one week and zpool/mininpoolhub the other.
I'll also add that with nemosminer the only factors in deciding which coin to mine are the current price relative to btc and your hashrate. hashrate is constant, but as i mentioned above, price is very volatile. The time it takes to mine a block, wait for it to mature, and exchange for btc can take long enough that the price may have plummeted in the meantime (or if you're lucky skyrocketed). So predicted income is exactly that, predicted.
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][HashTap™][FlexFee™] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
Web page error?
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '<<' (T_SL) in /home/zpool/next/web/yaamp/core/backend/rawcoins.php on line 311
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '<<' (T_SL) in /home/zpool/next/web/yaamp/core/backend/rawcoins.php on line 311
aaand it's back. doesn't look like it affected mining in anyway.
Re: NemosMiner-v1.7.6 multi algo profit switching NVIDIA miner for MPH & ZPOOL
in the opensource world, it's generally nice to give credit where credit is due https://github.com/aaronsace/MultiPoolMiner
Re: NemosMiner-v1.7.4 multi algo profit switching NVIDIA miner for MPH & ZPOOL
Is there some way to benchmark the algos easier, seen .txt file above that had specific numbers listed as benchmarks for each algo.. how did yall do that? im linking what im talking about
Code:
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] blakecoin : 8304139.4 kH/s, -10999 MB, 67108864 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] blake : 4767552.0 kH/s, 2 MB, 67108864 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] blake2s : 6717441.6 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] bmw : 2876996.4 kH/s, 66 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] bastion : 19386.4 kH/s, 234 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] deep : 66240.6 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] decred : 4961711.2 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] fresh : 25065.3 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] fugue256 : 723228.2 kH/s, 130 MB, 4194304 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] groestl : 68094.8 kH/s, 2 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] heavy : 64930.8 kH/s, 166 MB, 524032 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] hmq1725 : 7810.9 kH/s, 644 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] keccak : 1026037.0 kH/s, 130 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] jackpot : 18548.2 kH/s, 108 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] jha : 25728.4 kH/s, 134 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lbry : 492183.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 8388608 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] luffa : 549619.1 kH/s, 130 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lyra2 : 5103.1 kH/s, 12 MB, 65536 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lyra2v2 : 64216.9 kH/s, 1570 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lyra2z : 2651.5 kH/s, 12 MB, 65536 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] myr-gr : 124930.4 kH/s, 66 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] neoscrypt : 1475.3 kH/s, 306 MB, 65536 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] nist5 : 83465.4 kH/s, 66 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] penta : 26863.5 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] qubit : 32965.1 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sha256d : 1846864.9 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sha256t : 1066858.2 kH/s, 2 MB, 8388608 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sia : 3129930.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 67108864 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sib : 15462.1 kH/s, 1218 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] skein : 706579.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] skein2 : 640114.9 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] s3 : 66537.9 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] timetravel : 21979.2 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] bitcore : 27810.0 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x11evo : 12635.2 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x11 : 16460.0 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x13 : 17518.1 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x14 : 17889.2 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x15 : 17076.3 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x17 : 16736.9 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] vanilla : 6290462.1 kH/s, 2 MB, 16777216 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] veltor : 39056.8 kH/s, 130 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] whirlpool : 78090.1 kH/s, 2 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] zr5 : 6622.8 kH/s, 88 MB, 262144 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] GPU #1: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] blake : 4767552.0 kH/s, 2 MB, 67108864 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] blake2s : 6717441.6 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] bmw : 2876996.4 kH/s, 66 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] bastion : 19386.4 kH/s, 234 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] deep : 66240.6 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] decred : 4961711.2 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] fresh : 25065.3 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] fugue256 : 723228.2 kH/s, 130 MB, 4194304 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] groestl : 68094.8 kH/s, 2 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] heavy : 64930.8 kH/s, 166 MB, 524032 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] hmq1725 : 7810.9 kH/s, 644 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] keccak : 1026037.0 kH/s, 130 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] jackpot : 18548.2 kH/s, 108 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] jha : 25728.4 kH/s, 134 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lbry : 492183.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 8388608 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] luffa : 549619.1 kH/s, 130 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lyra2 : 5103.1 kH/s, 12 MB, 65536 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lyra2v2 : 64216.9 kH/s, 1570 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] lyra2z : 2651.5 kH/s, 12 MB, 65536 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] myr-gr : 124930.4 kH/s, 66 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] neoscrypt : 1475.3 kH/s, 306 MB, 65536 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] nist5 : 83465.4 kH/s, 66 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] penta : 26863.5 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] qubit : 32965.1 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sha256d : 1846864.9 kH/s, 2 MB, 33554432 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sha256t : 1066858.2 kH/s, 2 MB, 8388608 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sia : 3129930.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 67108864 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] sib : 15462.1 kH/s, 1218 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] skein : 706579.5 kH/s, 2 MB, 1048576 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] skein2 : 640114.9 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] s3 : 66537.9 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] timetravel : 21979.2 kH/s, 34 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] bitcore : 27810.0 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x11evo : 12635.2 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x11 : 16460.0 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x13 : 17518.1 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x14 : 17889.2 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x15 : 17076.3 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] x17 : 16736.9 kH/s, 610 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] vanilla : 6290462.1 kH/s, 2 MB, 16777216 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] veltor : 39056.8 kH/s, 130 MB, 2097152 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] whirlpool : 78090.1 kH/s, 2 MB, 524288 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] zr5 : 6622.8 kH/s, 88 MB, 262144 thr.[0m
[2017-06-08 15:44:54] GPU #1: Intensity set to 18, 262144 cuda threads[0m
I don't know about all versions, but the tpruvot fork you can run with `--benchmark`
You can view http://www.zpool.ca/api/status for the current estimated payouts. right now blake2s is at 0.00060351 btc/GH/day. so with 12.55GH/s you'd earn 0.0076 btc/day (~$USD 20), assuming that exchange rate and difficultly holds steady. (which it wont).
0.00060351 * 12.55 = 0.0075740505
but yes, your maths on the 24hr/actual is correct. It's just that the previous 24hrs are not necessarily a good indicator of the next 24hrs due to the high volatility of all altcoins.
0.00060351 * 12.55 = 0.0075740505
but yes, your maths on the 24hr/actual is correct. It's just that the previous 24hrs are not necessarily a good indicator of the next 24hrs due to the high volatility of all altcoins.
Re: NemosMiner-v1.7.4 multi algo profit switching NVIDIA miner for MPH & ZPOOL
Intrigued by your project i've been playing around with it a bit for the past few days and wondered why you're using an older binary of ccminer (ccminerAlexis78) instead of the latest version https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer ?
AFAIK the tpruvot fork also includes the changes of previous ccminer versions so should be as fast (if not faster) than previous versions. The only exception I can think of would be the spmod fork of ccminer which is partially private.
So I've been manually comparing hashrates on blake2s between the versions and was surpised to find that the alexis78 version was slightly faster, which did not make sense to me. I did notice though that my computer was noticabley laggier on alexis78 over tpruvot. That got me thinking that maybe intensity is handled differently between the 2 so I started playing around with different settings on my stock GTX 1070.
on alexis78 with default settings = 3.7GH/s, intensity 25 = 3.5GH/s = intensity 30 = 3.67GH/s
on tpruvot with default settings = 3.4GH/s, intensity 25 = 3.4GH/s = intensity 30 = 3.67GH/s
So you might need to tweak the intensity settings a bit but ultimately you only need to use the latest version of ccminer (except for equihash).
Still need to play around with spmod as it could be faster on groestl and skein.
On the plus side I'm making about 50% through zpool than i was on nicehash.
AFAIK the tpruvot fork also includes the changes of previous ccminer versions so should be as fast (if not faster) than previous versions. The only exception I can think of would be the spmod fork of ccminer which is partially private.
So I've been manually comparing hashrates on blake2s between the versions and was surpised to find that the alexis78 version was slightly faster, which did not make sense to me. I did notice though that my computer was noticabley laggier on alexis78 over tpruvot. That got me thinking that maybe intensity is handled differently between the 2 so I started playing around with different settings on my stock GTX 1070.
on alexis78 with default settings = 3.7GH/s, intensity 25 = 3.5GH/s = intensity 30 = 3.67GH/s
on tpruvot with default settings = 3.4GH/s, intensity 25 = 3.4GH/s = intensity 30 = 3.67GH/s
So you might need to tweak the intensity settings a bit but ultimately you only need to use the latest version of ccminer (except for equihash).
Still need to play around with spmod as it could be faster on groestl and skein.
On the plus side I'm making about 50% through zpool than i was on nicehash.
Just setup a p2pool for Chipcoin if anyone wants to try out this coin without having to sign up for anything.
Code:
sgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://122.108.69.241:9441 -u yourChipcoinaddress -p x -I 13
been awhile since I mined p2p...how long generally does it take for rigs to show up?
Once you start seeing shares being accepted in your miner. You should be able to see your wallet address on http://122.108.69.241:9441/static/
I've been having decent luck solo mining up until today, but the difficulty has really shot up. Probably people trying to get in before the reward halves sometime tomorrow.
Just setup a p2pool for Chipcoin if anyone wants to try out this coin without having to sign up for anything.
Code:
sgminer.exe -o stratum+tcp://122.108.69.241:9441 -u yourChipcoinaddress -p x -I 13