what is current block reward?

More like greedy idiots voting 50 is keeping the price down.

As an investor and a miner, thanks for the info. I am happy with this roadmap.

I love the notion of anonymous chat through TOR.

I was wondering if we can expect something like the chat-rooms that Compuserve had circa 1994-1995- only p2p and anonymous?

didn't take very long. Diff at 41 now:

http://dwarfpool.com/tac/calc

This has been floating around since January, so apologies if you've already seen it, but its good info for other DRK bambies like myself. A very good read on how BTC users can be linked to their addresses.

http://people.csail.mit.edu/spillai/data/papers/bitcoin-transaction-graph-analysis.pdf

To me it shows how DRK fills a niche BTC simply cannot.

noob question. What happens to drk.coinmine.pl once the admin realizes it is on the wrong fork. Highest block currently there is 75307 while my new 9.4.11 wallet says current block is 75336.

Can I assume any balance accrued after the fork will be forfeit?

I'm getting just over 2Mh/s per 750ti -

I'm a small miner and I have consistently stuck with dwarfpool from the beginning. It is a simple and elegant website. It is reliable, has great features and is very functional. In my mind its UI is more Google and others are like Bing and Yahoo. I just like it better than the other pools I have tried.

I'm not trying to bash any of the other pool specifically, but as  whole I wish pools would focus more on function and less on style.

my 2 grs..

and don't let that Google comparison go to your head Atrides 

ccminer-0.9 in quiet mode (-q)

here is my bat

ccminer50.exe -q --algo=jackpot -o stratum+tcp://www.hashharder.com:9958 -u JURG5Dum3BR26fePtp8fS9gHWazHR9Z3r6 -p stizz

Man you really hate us , and yes these numbers are bulshit , cause with a ti 750 we make 4mhs.
[/quote]

Thank you for your input,
Can you upload your screen capture, i hope to update the table,
Actually, .9 makes big improvements, and the number is base on the number from .8 with actual hashrate
Thank you
[/quote]
http://i.imgur.com/hgKYONW.png
 (2) OC 750ti running CCminer50 v9 - slightly unstable

and I was wrong about temp,...60C

nvidia numbers are pure bullshit but other than that sounds about right..
edit:
if nvidia code used the same hashing rounds strategy as the others it would be fair a comparison but it doesn't..
[/quote]

Man you really hate us , and yes these numbers are bulshit , cause with a ti 750 we make 4mhs.
[/quote]

I can confirm this. Plus temps never pass 55C & fan sits at 35%.

Booya.

Some additional numbers:

Intel Xeon E5 1650 (1.75 MH/s)
NVidia 650Ti (1.95MH/s)

I downloaded the compiled CCminer 5  from http://cryptomining-blog.com/wp-content/files/ccminer-0.5-windows-latest.zip

I am seeing a decrease now. 

Prior, with CCminer v4, I was getting 6500 khash/s with (2) 750Ti cards. Now I'm getting 5200 khash/s with v5.

The pre-compiled version I am using is set for compute 3.5. - is that my issue? Do I need a differently compiled version for my card?

 

#30 on said list. 

Anyone who truly thinks the coin is dead and wants to throw away their 'garbage' fuguecoins, allow me to offer up a proper 'recycling receptical' : F9B3uM9Zqjk5xq6y2M2HJd7pQDPahhgYLW

I'll make sure they go to a good home, with rolling pastures and babbling brooks.   

I'm still trying to wrap my head around the idea that mining with a proprietary GPU miner closed to other devs is a good thing. I can't really seem to do it.

Maybe I'm just a naive ideologue , but the open nature of crypto currency in general is it's primary allure -to me at least. Open source and peer reviewed is best all around for any aspect of this crazy mining endeavor.

With Scrypt ASICs loudly clanging the death knell of impending profitability decline for massive GPU Scrypt farms. A new coin sporting an eco-friendly (by comparison) algorithm shows up just in time for summer. An 'every mans' mining coin with low power consumption that levels the play field and furthers the goal of widely distributed hash rate. But would that necessarily be the case if I have to pay a premium for a proprietary mining app?

So to C&C I ask: why is this a good idea to anyone other than yourselves?

and to the larger community I ask: does anyone else see an issue and if so what are the implications.

I pronounce it Groostle - and growl the gr sound like a Russian. ::shrug:: Is that wrong?

has anybody had this happen?

http://i.imgur.com/5QqGk3W.png

should clarify that 35 watts was the reported TDP

this article has very good info about actual power consumption:
http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/gtx-750-ti-litecoin/

And who says the 750ti can't handle new algos? does just fine with scrypt, groestl and fugue from my testing. What algos can it not handle?

no promises but it might just work by default. The other night I accidentally (quadrupal?) clicked my Groestl_start.bat and went to bed. The bat launched twice.  so when I went to look in the morning, I had two ccminer cmd windows open, and each one was reporting back half my expected hash rate. It did take a reboot to get one single instance running back at full hash however.

Maybe Chris B can weigh in. There must be a way to indicate which GPU threads you want to use.

35w per card is what i have read.

I have not done much comparison testing, but my one rig with (2) 750ti in it is pulling 195w when I mine Fugue and it only pulls 175w when I mine Groestl.

System is win7 32 bit running on an i5 2500k chip.

My other 2 card system has a Q6600 chip, so it probably sucks a bit more wattage.