Bytemaster says he can help you clone btsx, whether to consider cloning btsx it? I think it would be more valuable.
Quote
My personal opinion would be guided heavily by the attitude of our lead dev, nioccoin, but I must admit this option does sound like a very interesting avenue to explore!!
Quote
DEV,You should consider clone BTS not QORA 1.BTS use C++,it's better than java 2.We don't know when and how will QORA release the resources 3.We have a strong community and BTS have a long term development map.this is win-win 4.In my opnion,BTS is better than QORA
If you can successfully developed the first bts cloning, that the value of the ora greatly improve. And bytemaster have colleagues to help you develop, I think it should not be a problem.
If we do end up giving the original stakeholders a top up from the left over stakes I think our only option is to use the original stakeholder list. If somebody chose to sell their stake early it doesn't change the fact that they were an original stakeholder. If a non-stakeholder buys a lot of ORA assets before the vote it doesn't change the fact that they weren't an original stakeholder.
My understanding of the NXT voting system is ALL ORA asset holders would be eligible to vote, even people who weren't original stakeholders but bought ORA on the NXT AE from early sellers.
It would be nice to be able to vote asap, but we don't have any control over when the NXT voting system goes live.
Bytemaster says he can help you clone btsx, whether to consider cloning btsx it?