Search content
Sort by
Showing 16 of 16 results by stonesy
Re: [ANN] HAT.Exchange - The True P2P Experience | IFS Rewards | BETA (Q3 2018)
Still no legal team on the website I see, I thought you were moving legal teams months ago...
Will we ever get to see the glorious exchange on the app store...will we ever see the true team behind this garage/bedroom shitcoin?
Will we ever get to see the glorious exchange on the app store...will we ever see the true team behind this garage/bedroom shitcoin?
Re: [ANN] HAT.Exchange - The True P2P Experience | IFS Rewards | BETA (Q3 2018)
Recently HAT tokens were delisted from KuKoin and IDEX. As many of you know, KuKoin delisted HAT because of volume requirements. HAT.Exchange respects this business decision but does not condone pumping practices to merely inflate token value and volume throughput. Unfortunately, IDEX chose to delist the HAT token as well because of pressure from outside of the exchange. Both are business decisions made in an ever competitive and tightening market vying for trader attention.
The HAT Exchange is a clear competitor in this space and has always targeted trade of the HAT token on its own Exchange. Rest assured these actions have only accelerated our Open Beta release timeline, so you will be able to use the HAT Exchange to trade the HAT token. Soon you will be able to download the apps from Google Play and Apple stores respectively.
The HAT Exchange is a clear competitor in this space and has always targeted trade of the HAT token on its own Exchange. Rest assured these actions have only accelerated our Open Beta release timeline, so you will be able to use the HAT Exchange to trade the HAT token. Soon you will be able to download the apps from Google Play and Apple stores respectively.
You don't condone pumping price to merely inflate token value or volume throughput? Correct me if I am wrong, but prior to Christmas '17 didn't HAT.Exchange effectively employee or pay tokens for services to an individual named CoinVat; whom did just that?
Re: [ANN] HAT.Exchange - The True P2P Experience | IFS Rewards | BETA (Q3 2018)
Enjoy the read for any newcomers, avoid avoid avoid Z- project run by Z listers
https://github.com/ico-check/ico-check/issues/136
https://github.com/ico-check/ico-check/issues/136
hi please i have a question, i want to know if i can stake hat coin on etherum network so if i bought hat coin i can stake them or i must open a hat account ?
i ask this because i no want submitte KYC verif i think this is not correct for dex project.
i ask this because i no want submitte KYC verif i think this is not correct for dex project.
You can do staking with Myetherwallet BUT its not supported from HAT
Take a try and ask abouth this in the TG
They want your Data
Hey, look, a huge new announcement from the team: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2285591.0
You might want to read it so you can stop arguing from ignorance.
Theres zero evidence to support your claim that they want your data (just for the sake of having it, or selling it, or whatever other delusional fantasy you have), and there is a load of evidence showing that they dont, and only need to securely store KYC data for legal compliance reasons.
KYC/AML compliance is something crypto traders need to start getting used to if they want to transfer to and from fiat currency. The HAT team are actually ahead of the competition in that legal compliance is a top priority. They explained in a recent newsletter that the goal is to have as small a legal footprint as possible, so in actuality they are only asking for the bare minimum from their users.
Which project do you think will be more successful: the one that builds legal compliance into the system from day one, or the one that tries to skirt laws and ends up getting shut down by governments? HAT has a long-term, realistic strategy for success.
If youre only in it for quick gainz hoping the token moons, so you can then launder the profits and evade taxes, then youre not HATs target customer. Maybe you should check out some pump and dump projects if those are your motives. There are plenty of them being promoted on telegram in the shady groups Im sure you frequent
compliance from day one..... LOL
kinda like lying about the airdrop..
kinda like lying about their friend coin vat
kinda like spending funds on other projects
kinda like starting the company 6 months later.. only after being called out
kinda like not having trademark
kinda like NEVER applying for MSB license even thou they stated they did 100's of times
this business will be a failure just as the few others they ran into the ground.. good luck with your Long term investment
musclepump one year from now long after HAT has launched and is operating as a successful p2p exchange and marketplace: But the airdrop! But CoinVat! But spending funds! But MSB licenses!
Nobody cares now, dude. Nobody will even know wtf youre talking about then.
lol you think you've found a rough diamond, which is exactly what we all thought pre-december; unfortunately you've just been left at the airport with your bags packed for a plane that's never going to take-off, if it was ever scheduled at all.
HAT isn't a diamond, it's a large, brown, cylindrical turd rolled in glitter to entice people to part with their hard-earned.
Re: [ANN] HAT.Exchange - The True P2P Experience | IFS Rewards | BETA (Q3 2018)
What happened to the legal team that was on Bynary Inc webpage and now subsequently does not exist, are we "changing" legal teams again or did the money dry up?
Copy/pasta from Reddit:
I have chased the elusive TekSystems a third time, as I have yet to receive confirmation. At this stage I'd say it's safe to say they aren't willing to divulge the information directly, and we must rely on blind faith.
Personally, if it were my face on their website - I would want to make certain that people were aware it was a legitimate project, as to not be guilty by association. That said, as they're hired help they certainly aren't at liberty to provide me any details unless instructed to do so. That's not to say that the project is an out-right "scam", but just another one of many "holes".
Throughout there have been many inconsistencies, dubious happenings and a complete lack of professionalism; given the current state of play and regardless of what the team thinks of my views/attitude - I still firmly believe the onus is on the team to diffuse the situation, but alas thus far their attitude has been "FUD Campaign" muh!
When in actual fact, it's more a case of concern and highlighting the holes that the team created all by themselves. Moreover, the holes have been so glaringly obvious that it was inevitable that someone was going to call them out on it.
I've relayed these thoughts to Edward the team "advisor" in private, and I know there's a few dedicated people still holding the team in high regards - but genuinely this campaign as they like to refer to it, has been nothing more than your own doing. Regardless of your cavalier attitude stating "investors" don't matter, we have no say etc etc - the contempt you hold and clearly demonstrate for any potential users of your project has been evident throughout - so it is no wonder that when you make mistakes people are quick to point the finger.
Which is why you should be squeaky clean and cut the crap - instead you appear to have gone dark/stealth i.e. website/blog has been cleaned of all traces of previous wrongdoing and instant bans for basically anyone who dare question your project in any capacity.
There were numerous comments made in December 2017 by your own admin team regarding legal teams, MSB licenses, trademarks, Venture Capital funding which never came to fruition and when push came to shove it was absolutely clear that little of that was true.
The team created this atmosphere of contempt whilst luring people with statements of grandeur, so you cannot blame us for being frustrated when people are let down by your (in my opinion) half baked reveal and announcements. When you make promises and statements like you have in the past, which then turn out to be misguided and false you create problems only for yourselves.
EDIT:
In addition I note your new whitepaper states "privately funded" - quite comical considering yes you were, by naive prospectors like myself buying your token. I guess the crux is that you were for all intents and purposes an ICO by any other name i.e. you dropped tokens, played the market to up the price, sold tokens on the back of false hope and promises and only when you had the funds from "investors" did you suddenly acquire a legal team and actually begin the motions of setting up an actual company.
I have chased the elusive TekSystems a third time, as I have yet to receive confirmation. At this stage I'd say it's safe to say they aren't willing to divulge the information directly, and we must rely on blind faith.
Personally, if it were my face on their website - I would want to make certain that people were aware it was a legitimate project, as to not be guilty by association. That said, as they're hired help they certainly aren't at liberty to provide me any details unless instructed to do so. That's not to say that the project is an out-right "scam", but just another one of many "holes".
Throughout there have been many inconsistencies, dubious happenings and a complete lack of professionalism; given the current state of play and regardless of what the team thinks of my views/attitude - I still firmly believe the onus is on the team to diffuse the situation, but alas thus far their attitude has been "FUD Campaign" muh!
When in actual fact, it's more a case of concern and highlighting the holes that the team created all by themselves. Moreover, the holes have been so glaringly obvious that it was inevitable that someone was going to call them out on it.
I've relayed these thoughts to Edward the team "advisor" in private, and I know there's a few dedicated people still holding the team in high regards - but genuinely this campaign as they like to refer to it, has been nothing more than your own doing. Regardless of your cavalier attitude stating "investors" don't matter, we have no say etc etc - the contempt you hold and clearly demonstrate for any potential users of your project has been evident throughout - so it is no wonder that when you make mistakes people are quick to point the finger.
Which is why you should be squeaky clean and cut the crap - instead you appear to have gone dark/stealth i.e. website/blog has been cleaned of all traces of previous wrongdoing and instant bans for basically anyone who dare question your project in any capacity.
There were numerous comments made in December 2017 by your own admin team regarding legal teams, MSB licenses, trademarks, Venture Capital funding which never came to fruition and when push came to shove it was absolutely clear that little of that was true.
The team created this atmosphere of contempt whilst luring people with statements of grandeur, so you cannot blame us for being frustrated when people are let down by your (in my opinion) half baked reveal and announcements. When you make promises and statements like you have in the past, which then turn out to be misguided and false you create problems only for yourselves.
EDIT:
In addition I note your new whitepaper states "privately funded" - quite comical considering yes you were, by naive prospectors like myself buying your token. I guess the crux is that you were for all intents and purposes an ICO by any other name i.e. you dropped tokens, played the market to up the price, sold tokens on the back of false hope and promises and only when you had the funds from "investors" did you suddenly acquire a legal team and actually begin the motions of setting up an actual company.
Re: [ANN] Hawala.Today | IFS | P2P CASH-CRYPTO | COINSWAP | BOUNTIES
Re: [ANN] Hawala.Today | IFS | P2P CASH-CRYPTO | COINSWAP | BOUNTIES
Hi All,
Here's my submission for the upcoming bounty contest, watch, enjoy and let me know what you think!
Thanks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihbmQtrcB0w
Here's my submission for the upcoming bounty contest, watch, enjoy and let me know what you think!
Thanks
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihbmQtrcB0w
Re: [ANN] Hawala.Today | IFS | P2P CASH-CRYPTO | COINSWAP | BOUNTIES
Really enjoying this project at the moment, pace of delivery has been spot on and thus far all the deliverables have been met. The current wallet in alpha has had numerous builds for the various OS.
The only niggles I have so far.
Website needs updating asap, roadmap milestones, dashboard for market state (circ supp etc).
Lack of exchanges, not Hawala.Todays fault as the wheels are in motion.
More Marketing, and not the community made ones
The only niggles I have so far.
Website needs updating asap, roadmap milestones, dashboard for market state (circ supp etc).
Lack of exchanges, not Hawala.Todays fault as the wheels are in motion.
More Marketing, and not the community made ones
Re: 🔴HADRON🔴⠀WEB⠀BROWSER⠀AI⠀MINING🔴 Mining⠀started,⠀apply⠀now,⠀AIRDRP⠀bount🔴
Hi Hadron,
Very intriguied by the use cases this project could offer.
Specs for my machines are as follows:
Laptop:
Intel Core i7 7700HQ "Kaby Lake" 2.8GHz Quad Core with HT
16GB Corsair Vengeance 2400MHz DDR4
512GB SSD
6GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
Windows 10, Firefox, Edge
PC:
I7 2600K @ 3.2ghz
8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3
2x512GB SSD
EVGA Geforce 580GTX
Firefox, Chrome, IE, Windows 7
Mobile:
Samsung Galaxy S8+ (Silk and Chrome)
Apple iPhone X (Safari)
Very intriguied by the use cases this project could offer.
Specs for my machines are as follows:
Laptop:
Intel Core i7 7700HQ "Kaby Lake" 2.8GHz Quad Core with HT
16GB Corsair Vengeance 2400MHz DDR4
512GB SSD
6GB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060
Windows 10, Firefox, Edge
PC:
I7 2600K @ 3.2ghz
8GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3
2x512GB SSD
EVGA Geforce 580GTX
Firefox, Chrome, IE, Windows 7
Mobile:
Samsung Galaxy S8+ (Silk and Chrome)
Apple iPhone X (Safari)