Clearly I was asking what that means or is intended as.....

https://bittrex.com/Market/?MarketName=BTC-SC

I mean, at least try to come up with FUD that isn't an obvious lie?

What's POHW?

http://youtu.be/5hfYJsQAhl0

I'm not even saying buying VRC is a good idea, but listening to this guy, who has no credentials himself but feels qualified to pass judgement, is downright dumb.

Or they're just trying to get out at the price they got in over the last week since the whitepaper resulted in no pump at all

Not saying SC doesn't deserve to be higher, just that in cryptoland price doesn't always go to what it "should" be, but instead to what market manipulators do with it - they're the ones throwing around large amounts of btc.

Where was over 500 BTC traded?  Which exchange?

While I like what the author did, he is still violating copyright law and stealing from the guys who originally wrote the code.  I would encourage everyone to use the IFMI workaround to remove his pool, or simply BLOCK the IPs of the pools he's connecting to.

Sorry, OP, I'd gladly donate for source code, but potentially malicious, entirely illegal code is a fail.  Try making it 0%, giving out source code, and you'd get more of a donation from me than you'd ever make with your 2%.

Just curious how this is different from Myriad?  Only difference I see is the halving time/reward...

Instead of forking Myriad, you could've made a colored coin like the Liberdade project.  Would be much more effective for a country coin.

How is this anything other than an inferior clone of Myriad with a scammy IPO?

Did the patch get moved?  Don't see it on the website.

Haven't gotten to actually test cryptoslax on PXE yet, got everything setup but couldn't get the pxe files from slax easily (without unplugging the USB stick) so I stopped for the day, and I haven't had a chance to give it a shot again yet.

Thanks man, excited about the new version.  Is this going to have cgminer 3.7.2 for scrypt instead of the 3.7.3 (which is broken)?

Now I just have to get PXEBoot working for slax (2/3rds of the way there, hehe)

Also, is 1UrayjqRjSJjuouhJnkczy5AuMqJGRK4b your BTC address?

Hmmm, okay, so the two bugs I've gotten so far are;

1) I can't SSH in and start a rig - it won't report temp data if you do that.

2) 2 of the 7 rigs don't boot at all, and just hang at "looking for slax data in /slax...."

Great work so far! 

Ongoing edit saga of getting this going, hehe.  So, what I've found now is that if I start the miner from the actual computer, ie mouse and keyboard, I get the GPU temps reported correctly, but if I ssh in and start cgminer, then I can't get temps.  It's weird because anubis will even get temp data when I start it locally, but gets 0's if I start remotely.

3% premine?  HAHAHAHAHA

Most obvious pump and dump yet.

I keep saying this was the best disguised pre-mine ever.

This was the best disguised pre-mine I've ever seen.

Instead of just saying "fuck you, we're taking X blocks", they instead made it impossible for pools to actually be setup and didn't share stratum source code and didn't let anyone except other "devs" that they were "working with" get setup beforehand.

So what happened is that their friends, who already had it working were able to mine it immediately and the rest of us got fucked.  They knew it would happen - this is a whole new algorithm and people have to set it up.  They knew there'd be a learning curve, but by not allowing anyone to see it beforehand, they purposely fucked over anyone who wasn't involved in the first place.

For example, I heard, and I don't know this first hand so take that into account, that the guy who wrote Cudaminer personally mined 500 blocks.  Makes sense, since he's got his CPU mining shit down right?  Well that's ONE SIXTH of the current total coin supply.

So congratulations, all these coins you're mining, and there's a dude who's ALREADY a millionaire because he has so many.  

I had such high hopes for this coin, and its proved itself to just be another shitcoin with a shitty launch and misleading devs.

Hey, I'm trying to figure this out and any help would be appreciated:
If you take a look at https://blockchain.info/tx/8b48f30c51aa24833789e9964e3952b8c9cbaa8966c29b65dc9e23229349e437
I'm setting up a website to process coins coming in/out, so I had received 0.01014, and tried to send 0.01 to the new address, with a tx fee of 0.0001, then move the 0.00004 to a different account
eg:
$coin->settxfee(0.0001);
$tx = $coin->sendfrom(ACCOUNT,ADDR,0.01);
$move = $coin->move(ACCOUNT,FEES,0.00004);

As you can see from the blockchain tho, it took 0.00014 as the fee, which at 192 bytes it seems like it should've taken the minimum right?

These funds weren't aged at all and were immediately sent on, so I'm not sure if thats part of the problem?

Thanks for any help, I'm really at a loss.

Selling PXL at 0.05 BTC/100 PXL.

Difficulty is going up, hashrate is more than double what it was at the last change, PXL is just going to get more expensive.  Buy them now before they're 0.1/100.

PM me, can do either 100 chunks with you sending first, or we use escrow.  *NO EXCEPTIONS* Not down for scammers.

^ This is why I'm hesitating to actually use my PXL to put up an image yet.

The idea of 1-2% for the first one or two changes in a certain time frame, say 3 months seems reasonable, and then increasing costs to prevent misuse.  Larger fees for one time services, like making a space changeable, transferring ownership, etc seems straightforward enough.

Have to say, really like where pxl is going.