Awesome!
any time estimate for this?

Sell wall is dissappearing bit by bit.

The buy tsunami is nearing.

http://nxtreporting.com/?as=12465186738101000735

http://i.imgur.com/gMPRUeb.png

Only pretty good?

We are on CoinMarketCap.com now. The logo on there is good. Its a different one. Its on the first page of this thread.

But go to the site and see how is looks lined up with the other coins and tell me what you think.

Mac wallet does not work. Is Chancecoin.jar file corrupted?

EDIT: It is necessary to download the latest version of JAVA.
After that, the application works 

There's a new article on CoinDesk.
How BitPesa Plans to Reduce Friction in the Remittances Market
http://www.coindesk.com/bitpesa-plans-reduce-friction-remittances-market/

NEM should have mobile SMS functionality.

I just downloaded Newbiecoin and was disappointed to see that the "world cup betting" feature only allows users to bet on two teams: the winner and runner-up of the entire world up tournament. It looks like Newbiecoin is using a centralized feed fed by the developers to settle that bet - I'm not sure I would trust that and call that decentralized. Furthermore, the dice betting on Newbiecoin is reduced to only allowing users to bet on a 50/50 bet. The website newbiecoin.org is also almost exactly the same as chancecoin.com website. Adopting the chancecoin protocol or codebase is one thing, but this is a gross and blatant act of plagiarism in my opinion.
 
Just my two cents - this whole world cup betting thing is way overblown. XCP has an implementation of world cup betting xbet.io that functions and looks better than what Newbiecoin has in every way, but it had almost no positive effect on XCP valuation and no betting volume. You can't just make a coin with a main feature that works only for two weeks worth of world cup, does it just die after that?

I own about 20K CHA but have mostly been a lurker on the chancecoin forum since about two months ago. It's great to see how the community has grown since then, and it seems to be really coming alive recently. I guess it's about time for me to stop watching passively on the sidelines and create an account to help with the marketing and promotion.

Btw, don't worry, I'm not selling my 20K CHA anytime soon

0.00075 but I have most I need already.

If you only have 1000, then hold them for a long time! You will profit handsomely.

I hope I can get this order filled before the price rises. I will spend a lot of time promoting CHA if I can accumulate a big stack. So if you hold many CHA you might consider selling me some, so that I promote CHA and help increase the price for ALL your coins

The inputs in the above diagram are not identical.
Check the difference with a DarkSend:
http://explorer.darkcoin.io/tx/56b3b95b76995d3e4d3107cf753c8496493010f625fc04d971e9262d74e6a5a5

yes 2.3 btc per stake is so cheap ...

That just figures, IT JUST FIGURES!

I was gone all day, come back, almost have enough bitcoins mined (.01 needed) to get a deposit, so I can exchange it for Darkcoins and what happens?  Evan announces a release candidate and once again, I will be paying a higher price for my dark!  Evan, you're lucky I adore you, you munchkin!!!!

BTW, congrats and thanks

New Member!

I guess spot #144 is vacant.
NXTL: 3701493936345227056
https://blockchain.info/tx/6a43e3bba2bd6b05ad87a9e10a049e6b93dd671858a1ffb777dc382443ceba1f

I don't understand why there are 2 topics, I also posted same message here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=562027.420

This would seem to explain a lot, but consider...
1) about average?: it's about average among the coins here as far as the other Rich Lists here: http://chainz.cryptoid.info/pot/
2) what is the total number of addresses?: one issue with these distribution measures is that they dont factor in the total number of addresses. A new coin might have only 200 addresses, so you'd expect the top 200 to own 100%. Point is, the standard rich-list measure that looks only at number of addresses doesn't factor in what percentage of the total number of addresses those top addresses make up.
3) exchanges: they make up big shares of any rich list, and different coins can have different levels of trading intensity on the exchanges.

In any case, kudos for this kind of info. Coin distribution is clearly a key metric the market cares about. As we can see with the success of BC, an otherwise unremarkable coin, on one end and the failure of QRK, which was very innovative at the time it was released, on the other end (and many other examples in between on both sides of the spectrum), people want insulation from the risk of big-whale coin dumps and are willing to pay for it and put that consideration over any other considerations about a coin's qualities, its dev's or its community's.