3.5B was the initial supply. With mining, our coin supply goes up. Projected currently to be 100B by the year 2043.

Bring Facts or stop FUD.

Stop FUD.

The Community and Dev´s are very activ.

The Market is going up and down wich is normal and when you lost then is this your Problem.

Why does not the coin go to small exchanges with a turnover of 1-2 million dollars per day? Such as crypto-bridge.org. Ten such exchanges will give an additional turnover of $ 100,000 per day. And then it will be easier to go to large stock exchanges, when the coin is well traded on 15-20 small stock exchanges!
If the coin is traded on 20 small exchanges, then no one will have the question that the coin is not popular.

how did you find the info that devs receieve more rewards of masternodes than all others?
just checking the blockexplorer?

just curious here

He mainil,very good runs down the POS, a good income from the master node.However, it is unclear how long the coin will last with the IPO.A lot of coins came on the Dew... only up to 10,000 blocks are mined.

See my above post. Also, we did just get the OK to be listed on yet another exchange. Check the official PAC twitter for additional updates and various links to upvote PAC so that it can be listed on more exchanges.

Many of the exchanges simply require a majority vote to get a coin listed & they only allow one new coin at a time. The PAC community is huge. If these whiners really wanted it listed on more exchanges, they'd be upvoting.

And just FYI, the team is working very hard (perhaps, too hard?) in attempt to get PAC listed on additional & major exchanges. A lot of the exchanges seem to be extremely stingy nowadays compared to the early days when just about anything within reason could get listed after passing a simple scam test. Nowadays, everyone and their mother is creating a bogus ICO and they have to weed out these fake scams. PAC is not one of these fakes.

The exchanges are being very cautious of anything that's not a registered security or that has a market cap below 100M-200M USD.

No need to delete it, you just need to configure the sentinel piece to get the ENABLED message showing.

best,
break.

Technically, yes. But that error message means you haven't properly configured the sentinel to keep the MN engaged with the network. The sentinel source is located here:

https://github.com/PACCommunity/sentinel

The network doesn't currently enforce sentinel usage but it's a good idea to enable it if you can. Also, you can see your MN status at:

http://monitor.masternodes.work/monitor

best,
break.

kel-alt - I took .3 BTC profit from the PAC run-up and bought more $PAC.
Just wanted you to know there is someone else that agrees investor/traders
just have to live and learn. As someone else said, no one forced anyone to
not do any research and buy PAC for BTC. I heard someone else say FUD is
good, it means the coin is being noticed, and maybe scared competition is
posting. No investor wins every bet, so time will tell. I know they are busy with
the redemption, but I would like to see new posts on website in addition to
social media, it would help confidence. I just looked at MN VPS set-up instructions
and they looked too complicated! What is VPS? Do you know if this/are these legit? -
http://altcoin-guide.com/paccoin-vps-masternode-guide/
 Go $PAC!

I've seen your posts and I've tried to avoid responding but now you're calling people stupid who are trying to reason with you. If you'd like to have a discussion, fine, but if you're just here to engage in name calling and attempting to validate your own twisted opinion of things, then I feel I need to respond. As always, let me be clear: I wasn't on the $PAC team when all this happened but the market dynamics are universal.

There's no offense intended. but your statements of fraud are 100% inaccurate and only lead me to believe you aren't well versed in financial markets. Financial markets are often out of sync, even on the same exchanges. There's an entire industry called arbitrage ( https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/arbitrage.asp ) and beyond that high-frequency trading ( https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/09/high-frequency-trading.asp ) that attempts to make gains by balancing those differences between exchanges. This is common on all markets and is part of how they actually work, the exchanges don't balance things, the market does.

I saw the spike in PAC and watched the market that day, I saw plenty of exchanges on other markets being moved over to Cryptopia for exactly that reason. People were arbitraging the exchanges. That's how efficient markets ( https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/032615/what-are-differences-between-weak-strong-and-semistrong-versions-efficient-market-hypothesis.asp ) work: when there's a price gap market makers move in and balance.

In regards to PAC, as plenty of people have stated, but for some reason plenty of people can't grasp: Cryptopia closed all of their LTC and DOGE pairs due to technical reasons. They didn't close just PAC, they closed all of them. This resulted in the lowest price for purchase on Cryptopia being 1 sat. The reason it was 1 sat is because Bitcoin only supports 8 points of precision ( https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/31933/why-is-bitcoin-defined-as-having-8-decimal-places ). You can't break a bitcoin down into a unit smaller than a single satoshi; instead, you have to use a coin of lower value and break that into smaller amounts.

Due to the markets closing, people made inefficient trades on Crytpoia (see above). They were perfectly valid trades, they were simply inefficient. I wasn't involved in $PAC at all at the time but it was easy enough to identify what the issue was. Coinmarketcap clearly showed that exchanges out of sync and Cryptopia was transparent about their closing of the LTC and DOGE pairs.

To sum up: markets are inefficient by nature. Two exchanges are inefficient, pairs between exchanges are inefficient. For example, right now there are price differences (on the same exchanges!) between trading pairs even for $PAC. That's true for BTC, LTC, ETH, etc. Pick any market that's traded in more than one place and there's a price difference. Differences in prices are not fraud, they're simply fact.

So, please read what is above, educate yourself further on markets, and then if you feel the need to comment, please do and if I can provide further information I'll do my best to do so -- as I always have. But simply claiming things are fraud and scams is a waste of everyone's time. Especially when the fraud you're alleging is a universal feature of all markets that anyone with a cursory understanding of market dynamics comprehends.

best,
break.

I can't help but feed the trolls, sorry everyone. You do realize in previous posts you accused the $PAC team of scamming people by raising the price and, in essence, encouraged people to avoid $PAC, drop their holdings, etc. -- which, of course, will likely lead a price to fall. And now, a few pages later you're accusing the magical $PAC team of causing the price to fall (which is exactly what people like you calling it a scam will do to anyone naive enough to believe you) and then buying it.

I'm just baffled. I'm pretty sure no matter what anyone says to you, you're just here to make trouble. That's all I can believe. I've come on here to let people know the $PAC team is still here to help but no matter what evidence you're shown, what proof you see, you just pick some random concept that confirms your bias and go with that.

Please research confidence bias and actually evaluate the facts. I know that's difficult for people on the internet but your statements are 100% inconsistent. If anyone is pushing the price down, it's people like you.

What benefit does a collapsing price have for $PAC -- we're the ones putting our time in to make $PAC functional?

best,
break.