Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 128 results by swisstrader
Re: [ANN] Bitcoin Confidential - The Truly Fungible Cryptocurrency
BC is the ticker for the long established Blackcoin
Sorry, but the ticker for BlackCoin is BLK.
Look at here:
https://coinmarketcap.com/de/currencies/blackcoin/
Second crash occurred with my 5 GPU rig, each 1070Ti with PL=120 W and OC=200/1000.
make sure your page file is big enough. i set mine to 7168 mb per card. then start lowering your OC until stability increases. I'd also decrease power for higher efficiency
make sure your page file is big enough. i set mine to 7168 mb per card. then start lowering your OC until stability increases. I'd also decrease power for higher efficiency
Where do I have to set the page file settings? It is Ubuntu. My knowledge about page file how to set is in Windows, no clue about settings in Ubunto.
Many thanks in advance for your help.
Found this here:
NVIDIA driver v396.24.10
clockOffset = 100 and memoryOffset = 1000 @ PL=220 W for 1080Ti
1070Ti with EWBF v0.6 delivers now 49 to 55 sols/s
clockOffset = 200 and memoryOffset = 1200 @ PL=120 W for 1070Ti
efficiency = 0.45 Sol/Ws
clockOffset = 100 and memoryOffset = 1000 @ PL=220 W for 1080Ti
1070Ti with EWBF v0.6 delivers now 49 to 55 sols/s
clockOffset = 200 and memoryOffset = 1200 @ PL=120 W for 1070Ti
efficiency = 0.45 Sol/Ws
Which is your 1080ti model? You did great job with mem + 1000. Are they stable with mem + 1000?
ASUS 1080Ti with three fans. Very stable, but do not increase clock offset!
NVIDIA driver v396.24.10
clockOffset = 100 and memoryOffset = 1000 @ PL=220 W for 1080Ti
1070Ti with EWBF v0.6 delivers now 49 to 55 sols/s
clockOffset = 200 and memoryOffset = 1200 @ PL=120 W for 1070Ti
efficiency = 0.45 Sol/Ws
clockOffset = 100 and memoryOffset = 1000 @ PL=220 W for 1080Ti
1070Ti with EWBF v0.6 delivers now 49 to 55 sols/s
clockOffset = 200 and memoryOffset = 1200 @ PL=120 W for 1070Ti
efficiency = 0.45 Sol/Ws
Re: [ANN][BTCZ] BitcoinZ - zkSNARKs 21b max POW-Zhash No-Premine No-Dev Tax
Hey TxtZ developers,
here is steeling BTC your idea in a patent,
please fight against this patent!
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=1&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&S1=10,043,174.PN.&OS=pn/10,043,174&RS=PN/10,043,174
here is steeling BTC your idea in a patent,
please fight against this patent!
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=1&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PTXT&S1=10,043,174.PN.&OS=pn/10,043,174&RS=PN/10,043,174
Re: miniZ, a new fast and friendly Equihash <144,5> Cuda miner.
Hi Swisstrader,
thanks a lot for your feedback.
Indeed, miniZ is not optimized for the GTX 1070 Ti, but we are woking on it and it will be fixed in the next version.
Btw, did you test it on windows or linux?
Cheers!
thanks a lot for your feedback.
Indeed, miniZ is not optimized for the GTX 1070 Ti, but we are woking on it and it will be fixed in the next version.
Btw, did you test it on windows or linux?
Cheers!
Hi,
thanks for the honest feedback.
Tested on Ubuntu 17.10.1 64bit, all 1070Ti tuned.
-swisstrader
Re: miniZ, a new fast and friendly Equihash <144,5> Cuda miner.
Result of 5 x 1070 Ti tuned rig (PL=120W, OC=200/1200):
With EWBF the hash rate is 233 sol/s at max. 64 °C GPU temperature.
Watching the nvidia-smi table I realized that the GPU usage switches between 98% and 100% with miniZ miner.
EWBF solved this issue in v0.5, GPU usage stays always at 100%.
Hope, that helps for improving your miniZ.
With EWBF the hash rate is 233 sol/s at max. 64 °C GPU temperature.
Watching the nvidia-smi table I realized that the GPU usage switches between 98% and 100% with miniZ miner.
EWBF solved this issue in v0.5, GPU usage stays always at 100%.
Hope, that helps for improving your miniZ.
Comparison of my 5 x 1070 Ti rig with new published miniZ miner:
Cards are too hot (68 °C) and hash rate result only 190 sol/s,
with EWBF v0.5 hash rate = 233 sol/s at max. 64 °C (room temp. 28 °C).
Cards are too hot (68 °C) and hash rate result only 190 sol/s,
with EWBF v0.5 hash rate = 233 sol/s at max. 64 °C (room temp. 28 °C).
Tested results after 24 hours:
ZHash 144_5 uses ~2.0GB VRAM
1070 ~41 to 46 Sol/s //tuned PL=140W, OC=50/1000
1080 Ti ~64 to 71 Sol/s //tuned PL=220W, OC=100/1000 test rig with 4 x 1080 Ti + 6 x 1070 = min. 517 to max. 535 Sol/s; Avg. = 526 Sol/s
Efficiency Avg. = 0.31 Sol/Ws = 0.31 Sol/J
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1070 Ti ~43 to 50 Sol/s //tuned PL=120W, OC=200/1200 test rig with 5 x 1070 Ti = min. 227 to max. 238 Sol/s; Avg. = 233 Sol/s
Efficiency Avg. = 0.40 Sol/Ws = 0.40 Sol/J
ZHash 144_5 uses ~2.0GB VRAM
1070 ~41 to 46 Sol/s //tuned PL=140W, OC=50/1000
1080 Ti ~64 to 71 Sol/s //tuned PL=220W, OC=100/1000 test rig with 4 x 1080 Ti + 6 x 1070 = min. 517 to max. 535 Sol/s; Avg. = 526 Sol/s
Efficiency Avg. = 0.31 Sol/Ws = 0.31 Sol/J
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1070 Ti ~43 to 50 Sol/s //tuned PL=120W, OC=200/1200 test rig with 5 x 1070 Ti = min. 227 to max. 238 Sol/s; Avg. = 233 Sol/s
Efficiency Avg. = 0.40 Sol/Ws = 0.40 Sol/J
Dumb question on my part likely - but how did you get Power usage stats to display there in your log output? I never have seen that, and could DEFINITELY use that to my advantage. Thanks for sharing, great stats thanks to v0.5...nice indeed! Cheers.
Adapt in your config file following line:
pec 0 => pec 1
That's it!
Enjoy!
Good job, man!
Rig with 5 x 1070 Ti (tuned with PL=120W and OC=200/1200)
Before with v0.3 (0.4 crashed my rigs sometimes):
After with v0.5 without any changings of my tuning:
From 199 sol/s to 236 sol/s.
About 18.5 % more solutions than before.
Thank you so much for fixing the v0.4 issues.
Rig with 5 x 1070 Ti (tuned with PL=120W and OC=200/1200)
Before with v0.3 (0.4 crashed my rigs sometimes):
After with v0.5 without any changings of my tuning:
From 199 sol/s to 236 sol/s.
About 18.5 % more solutions than before.
Thank you so much for fixing the v0.4 issues.
Re: [ANN] lolMiner 0.4 - Mining Minexcoin (MNX) and Equihash 144.5 coins (BTG,XSG...
New version v0.4 crashs with AMD RX Vega 64 8GB,
get sometimes windows crash with Blue Screen.
With this trick I got the prior version v0.38 working:
get sometimes windows crash with Blue Screen.
With this trick I got the prior version v0.38 working:
Code:
Download the extra compiled Vega64 file named gfx901.bin.
Delete in subfolder lolMiner_v0.38\kernels\144_5 the files gfx900.bin and gfx901.bin .
Then copy the extra file gfx901.bin into the same folder and rename the file to gfx900.bin,
now will run the miner perfectly with your AMD RX Vega 64 8GB.
Delete in subfolder lolMiner_v0.38\kernels\144_5 the files gfx900.bin and gfx901.bin .
Then copy the extra file gfx901.bin into the same folder and rename the file to gfx900.bin,
now will run the miner perfectly with your AMD RX Vega 64 8GB.
Re: [ANN][BTCZ] BitcoinZ - zkSNARKs 21b max POW-Zhash No-Premine No-Dev Tax
How can I solve this issue? Downloading proving key failed.
After second try I get this message:
After second try I get this message:
Thank you Woz2000 for your help.
I've tried it with three different PCs and all gave the same error message.
The file sprout-proving.key will be deleted by BTCZ wallet and it downloads to max. file size of 280 to 310 MB,
then stops to download the proving key and error message is shown.
I've updated Java to latest version v8 build 181, it looks to me that the wallet has a problem with the newest
Java version.
Waiting for cryptorex thaqt he solves the issue inside of wallet code.