Bug:

0.92.99.6 on win7-64
Transactions tab, My wallets filter, lots of TXs shown sorted by date desc.

Clicking column headers doesn't change sort order any more (it used to in 0.9.3, at least for the date and Amount columns).

I would really like to sort and filter (two different things) by bitcoins sent/bitcoins received. Sorting is a bug, filtering is a change request (I think).

Bounties/donations to 12aixCHSZcnNyEqhCJqnp5fhbaSjqJ6Fy2

Display bug:

0.92.99.6 on win7-64

Two watching-only wallets loaded (upgraded from 0.9.3).

Transactions tab, My Wallets filter: No transactions are shown
In previous release version I saw TXs from both wallets in this view. If I choose only one wallet I see the TXs.

On closer examination it seems as if the upgrade from 0.9.3 has lost the info that both wallets are mine so it might not actually be a display bug but some config info/metadata that went missing (I deleted the old DB when asked to).

Any bug bounties or donations welcome to 12aixCHSZcnNyEqhCJqnp5fhbaSjqJ6Fy2

Minor bug:
Looking at the Transaction Info window for a random tx, see the
'Some outputs might be "change." Click for more info'
I clicked the link which leads to https://bitcoinarmory.com/all-about-change which is "Page not found We're sorry, but the page you requested is not found."

(If anyone wants to pay a bug bounty 12aixCHSZcnNyEqhCJqnp5fhbaSjqJ6Fy2, if not I don't intend to complain )

How do I import from a btc armoury wallet?

This is the only info I can find on the private keys and I'm not a developer
https://bitcoinarmory.com/wallet-format/

About the NiceHash Giveaway Promotion:

Will we get one "lottery ticket" for the prize draw per 0.0453 BTC volume?

Or do I have to mine to a new address per 0.0453 BTC volume to maximise my winning chances?

I'd rather not have to script that but I'm sure someone will...

Westhash is one of the worst stunts ever.
Close it now and stop beng silly.

Yes, Nicehash needs more servers to better handle higher loads. Yes, Nicehash needs geographically disperse stratums. What it doesn't need is a competing service called westhash.

Get your shit together, this is not how you do it.

Yes betarigs has issues today. I've used them since january and they have always cleared up issues and been pretty fair. I recommend you send tickets and it will be sorted promptly, usually within 24 hours. No, I'm not affiliated with betarigs but I do use them to lease my rigs.

Is diff broken? My 88mh scrypt asic is very unhappy at d=512, I tried -p d=1024 to test but I only get 512. I should be at 32k according to the faq?

My 5970 works great with the windows build posted today at 2*1.8Mh, awesome speed for an ancient card.

I have a 6950 also doing 1.74Mh happily.

win 7 64, 13.12 whql drivers, sgminer_x11x13mod_30_05_2014

Awesome work everyone! This hashes grrrrreat on my 290 AND on my 5970 in the same rig.
The crappy reference 290 with elpida memory gets 3.600 Mh +- 0.020
The 5970 (my favourite card) gets 2*1.798, pretty much exactly the same as the 290. Goes to show you can still be useful even if you've been replaced by several generations!

If I were to wish for any more features it would be pool naming as in Kalroth's cgminer. With it you can (in the pool section of the config file) use
and instead of referring to it as "Pool 0" the miner uses the name. Purely cosmetic but handy.

Three cheers for all you brilliant devs! Thank you!

Sorry, I need windows binaries and I've lost track of the latest.

I have this exact same problem.
My 5970 runs at 2*1.687Mh/s on the last version in this thread which is locked at I 15. With it my 290 only gets 2.7Mh.
When I tried the newer version with unlocked I my 290 increased to 3.4 but the 5970 drops to 2*200Kh, losing me almost 3Mh total.

I would really appreciate it if someone could fix this?

cards:
7970 flashed to 280X
7950
290
5970 (two gpus)

Elun/all: thanks for the great work.

The latest version really helped for my 290 but my 5970 (2 gpu) went from 2*1.687Mh to 2*150Kh which more than lost out the gains on my 290. Is it possible to fix this? Same config, I tried a few tweaks, also running the 5970 at I 19 with no luck.

Same for me on my 5850 and 5670.

I'm using the run.bat that came with the download. The missing library isn't in the dlls folder either.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/326922

"or Msvcr70.dll or for Msvcr71.dll, you should install the CRT DLL into your application program files directory. You should not install these files into the Windows system directories. For Msvcr80.dll and for Msvcr90.dll, you should install the CRT as Windows side-by-side assemblies."

I also noticed windows is not up to date so I'm installing a bunch of stuff there in case it's that. win 7 64 in case it matters.

I tried the mingw version and it works on one box with 2 5xxx cards but no hashrate increase.

On my box with 2 280X the cygwin version works but doesn't show fans/temp. The mingw version gives an error about missing msvcr71.dll. Copying it over from the first box just leads to other missing dll errors. Do I need a library download?

I have the exact same problem. All work goes to the first pool and the others see lots of discarded. From irc:

12:02:39 - t00tie: Does anyone know how to mitigate "Discarded work due to new blocks: 42"? I can't get load-balance to work properly on pools with different difficulty
12:03:01 - kke: load balance on different coins is going to do that always
12:03:41 - kke: cgminer thinks they're the same coin and discards work on all pools when one stratum (even a failover stratum which is disabled) announces a block change
12:05:13 - kke: that's why the test where the dude had 50/50 middlecoin/hashcows was kind of bad