Da macht InsideWirtschaft Werbung für LifeTask.

 https://inside-wirtschaft.de/2018/11/19/lifetask-is-the-first-decentralized-blockchain-based-competence-platform-for-the-job-market/

Auch so ein interessanter ICO diesesmal aus Österreich.

Also pls stay away from this ICO: Smart Trade Coin: https://fintelegram.news/ico-sam-alert-do-not-invest-in-the-smart-trade-coin-ico/

In addition, we are quite sceptical about this ongoing ICO: https://www.extauri.com/

Super, danke! auch das Video ist cool. Es ist echt unglaublich, mit welcher Unverschämtheit diese Leute vorgehen.

Also wir waren das mit dem Bericht auf der Fintelegram. Das ArbitraCoin mit den Leuten zusammenhängt, haben wir von einem Whistleblower.  Hinsichtlich der schlechten Recherche: wir haben unser möglichstes getan, ... die Recherche hat sich sehr schwierig gestaltet. Das mit der YOBIT-Börse ändern wir mal gleich. Wir sind dankbar für alle Hinweise!

Habt ihr gesehen, dass die WGC jetzt auch den Smart Trade Coin macht? und wieder die selben Leute versucht abzuzocken? Wie gibt es das bloß? Wir fangen jetzt an die Leute, die dahinter stehen, in die Auslage zu stellen und zu identifizieren. Irgendwie muß man ja Leute identifizieren, die man für diese Abzocken auch zur Verantwortung ziehen kann.

Wir haben heute erfahren, das Cointed in den letzten Monaten durch Verkauf von Automaten usw. jede Menge Geld realisiert hat und versuchen nun zu eruieren ob sie diese Mittel dazu verwendet haben um ihre Rückstände zu tilgen. Haben sie das getan? Bitte um Mitteilung an office @fintelegram.com

Regarding the difference between hydrominer and cointed in your uunderstanding?

So i also did my check on hydrominer! Actually i also think that it is quite risky for the management of Hydrominer GmbH to issue Coins as long as the GmbH is not yet registered with the Austrian Commercial Court. But the risk is quite limited to any losses incurred between the day of the establishment of the company contract until the registration day (VORGESELLSCHAFT), afterwards the GMBH will be liable for the Coins issued. Hydrominer runs a voucher model: quite simple! you can exchange mining power in exchange for the vouchers. The people behind Hydrominer never issued any statements on big sales number achieved in 2015 and 2016 and they never claimed to move to Hongkong! resp. to issue the coins by using an asian company. When Hydrominer fails everyone knows that there is an Austrian company which can be sued! Quite simple. to sue an Asian company is much more difficult and the reason that Cointed ltd. moves to Asia in order to work the Asian market is not valid. Groups usually set up subsidiaries but do not move their headquarter to the Asian market. 

Regarding the token model:  hydrominer just issues voucher which can only be exchanged against mining power. The only problem which could result in their token being qualified as e-cash and resulting in big troubles with the FMA is their promise to get a listing on cryptocurrency exchanges (what will anyway probably never happen), but as long as the vouchers can not be used to buy services or goods from others the risk is limited. 

CoinTed describes in its white paper and in its public announcements that its coins can be used in a widely manner: other merchants and so on. So there is a very high risk to be qualified as e-cash and this means more than big troubles with a lot of different financial regulatory authorities in each country where such merchants will be located.

Both tokens/coins issued will not empower a decentralized network to be established.

Thanks to all of you to participate in this quite good discussion and thanks to Cointed to be so patient to answer all our questions as I am really eager to participate in this ICO:  

I have a few more questions for you: According to the Article shown on NewsBTC http://www.newsbtc.com/2017/10/19/cointed-token-ico-starts-24-hours/ CoinTed already showed impressive sales for  2015 (!) amounting to 7 Mio USD and a profit of 170.000k. I did a quick search on this:  On Bitcointalk as of 16th February 2016 you talked about having sold 60 BTC so far (via LocalBitcoins).https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1351953.0. As the average price for a BTC end of 2015 and beginning 2016 was quite low (300 – 500 USD) compared to nowadays figure, pls explain how you came finally up with sales of 7 Mio USD. !!In addition you only set up CoinTed OG as of 10.12. 2015 (what is in line with your statement in the Bitcointalk Forum back then). So again how does this fit with 7 MIo USD sales?
  
For 2016 you claim impressive sales of 30 Million USD and a profit of 600k. Again I tried to do a quick check but eventually CoinTed OG was deleted (!) as of 15.12. 2016 from the official books: the new Company CoinTed GmbH which is in existence since 24. 11 2016 does not show any sales between end of November 2016 and 31/12/2016 at all. So as of 16th February you just spoke about sales of 60 BTC and in December you made 0 sales: how did you make 30 Mio USD sales

Regarding my question about your physical presence in Hongkong: For Austrian legal and tax purposes only the economic substance of a legal structure is valid. So if you people being the board of management of the Cointed Limited are sitting in Vienna or Kufstein, Cointed Limited will be regarded as Austrian place of economic activity and you will be treated as an Austrian entity (but I am sure Deloitte will tell you all these things).

I am sure that Deloitte´s statement on your figures for 2015 and 2016 will bring assurance about your press releases. I can not imagine that you lied about your financial results in luring people to participate in your ICO. By the way you also could publish the financial statements of CoinTed OG for 2016 as well as your tax filings for 2016.

based on what is going on right now with other ICOs: https://cointelegraph.com/news/what-lessons-can-be-learnt-from-tezos-ico-debacle -  not only the one who buys the tokens but also the one who sells tokens should care about the legal structure of an ICO-project. Raising money with false statements also in the ICO world will result in legal proceedings. It is just a matter of time.   

There are evidently so many discrepancies with this CoinTed ICO no one should touch it. A quite evident question: why are these people in Kufstein or Vienna - should not they be in Hongkong??? 

Your project is quite interesting, and we definitely want to learn more about it:

you are saying (ref. white paper) that byte heroes GmbH is the developer of the upcoming decentralized system and the Issuer of the tokens, right? and you are also saying that HeroCoin is the cryptocurrency of your decentralized network (you are about to establish). So do I have to pay with HeroCoin for using the decentralized platform? and does this mean that this "payment" is going to byte heroes GmbH as revenue? And if the user has to pay with HeroCoin for the usage of the decentralized platform, what happens with the single HeroCoin paid to the developer. Sorry for asking all these questions, but we seriously consider to invest some money in your project.

i just flipped through the whitepaper It is saying:

HERO is a crypto currency to be used in connection with the HERO Network („HERO Network“).
The HERO Network is a decentralized pooling system that allows predicting future
events in a cus-tomized game atmosphere. Different to today‘s betting system, the
Developer has created a fully transparent system allowing a natural expansion by its own
community creating games (Contests) on top of the HERO Network. This new decentralized
model gives back a part of the rake to the community to let users participate on HEROs
success. In designing the HERO Network, the Developer has strived to address the following
issues that the market for esports betting currently faces.

So the HERO decentralized network is already up and running?

Hi guys, I am also working on the Litigation Token project. We did the project based on our experience in the digital economy world: startups have a lot of legal issues to fight against. During hype periods they have to fight against bully investors like BitRush. When everything is depressed they have to fight against investors questioning where has the money gone. As I am a CPA focussing on start-ups during the past 15 years, I am well aware about all these issues. BitRush shows how rude and pushy Investors - who want to get the majority without paying money - can be against founders. Noone can imagine how frustrating litigation can be for entrepreneurs being normally focused on setting up companies and being positive and creative.

In case of any question pls do not hesitate to contact us.