Seems like no one defends you and i also have something to say about this

The rule-> "33. Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.[e]"

Plagiarism
"an act or instance of using or closely imitating the language and thoughts of another without authorization and the representation of that author's work as one's own, as by not crediting the original author:"

-> Rule explained "33. This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own."

So in other words: This would imply to take credit as your own from someone else's work... not actually failing to put "quotes" on your pure intent of informative post or rather forgetting to link the source. To take credit and to make credit, thus to give credit; it can mean a much broader idea then its objective one.

It does not make sense to take an objective idea and transform it into subjective one, commons sense also prevails
For example, i can say "don't drink water, because you die!" Does this make sense? No, of course you don't die... But, i would prove you wrong, subjectively speaking, because it is forming my own concept of what i would say: drinking too much water in some cases can make you die (and now this is a true statement). See the difference? That's why we would need someone to defend us and our rights...

Plagiarism
"an act or instance of using or closely imitating the language and thoughts of another without authorization and the representation of that author's work as one's own, as by not crediting the original author:"

Rule explained "33. This includes both copying parts or the entirety of other users' posts or threads and copying content from external sources (e.g. other websites) and passing it as your own."

Stop acting dense. Eric Duprat's title is not "General Manager of Mobile at PayPal where he played an instrumental role in establishing PayPal as a player in mobile payments."
Saying something like "Eric Duprat, General Manager of Mobile at PayPal" is fine as it is clearly a title, but the latter part is clear plagiarism.
You don't come up with this marketing BS yourself, you have to copy it from somewhere. The chance of creating such a specific sentence yourself is very low.

That wouldn't be plagiarism because it's very short and not specific. But, if you write something like:
It would be plagiarism because you are directly copying posts from another source, without citing it.
For the exchange registration requirement post, you would put it in a quote or link to the source.

Very strange that the moderators so lightly to the participants at the forum. As I understand it, no one was able to explain the cause of the ban and the moderator didn't answer.

Um, did you miss this post?

Stop wasting everyone's time, lock the thread, and tell your "friend" to appeal to the e-mail address provided in the ban notice.

You've copied someone else's text, word for word, without quote marks and link to the source. If you don't understand what plagiarism is, then there is an explanation from the moderators.

---

Besides you're not allowed to posting messages elsewhere on the forum but only in your ban appeal's thread otherwise it would be considered as a ban evasion.

Besides you're not allowed to posting messages elsewhere on the forum but only in your ban appeal's thread otherwise it would be considered as a ban evasion.

@Pmalek, see the dates carefully. Yury1 was an original poster.

But despite this, most likely that Yury1 has been banned because he has copied text without indicating the sources.


Copy:
Original:

Eric Duprat was the General Manager of Mobile at PayPal where he played an instrumental role in establishing PayPal as a player in mobile payments. Eric Duprat one of the team members Monetha and send tweets about Monetha. And developers UTRUST nobody knows.

Prior to Verayo, Eric was the General Manager of Mobile at PayPal where he played an instrumental role in establishing PayPal as a player in mobile payments.

А толку от этих стейблкоинов? Это ведь аналог доллара в криптовалютном мире. Происходит подмена децентрализованной крипты стейблкоинами, цена которых стабильна. Все идет к тому, что все эти биржи спустят цену на настоящую крипту до нуля и начнут пропагандировать использование стейблкоинов как чего-то стабильного, чему можно доверять.

Ну, да. Все помнят как Хейэс высказался, что эфир должен будет упасть до 100$ и тут откуда ни возмись появляется биржа Битфорекс с анонимным учредителем на которой рисуются объемы в 50% от всего рынка торговли эфиром и начинает укатываться цена вниз с 500$ до 200$. Потом Хейэс высказывается о падении биткоина и на Битмекс рисуются объемы в 10-20 раз больше чем на других топовых биржах и цена начинает лететь вниз с 6000$ до 3000$.
Действительно, при чём здесь Битмекс и Хейэс?   Он ведь просто так это сказал и обороты на бирже почти настоящие