Switzerland doesn't do QE, and it doesn't have a huge deficit.

What is not a joke is how many suckers you nxt people duped with your lies and false promises and then you  proceeded to further scam and rob them.

No way, no matter how much money. I am from China, there is impossible for me to name my baby with a Japanese name, if I do this, the baby's future will be ruined if we still live in China. Because most of Chinese people don't like Japanese for the history reason.

All of these darknet markets eventually turn out to be scams .. why wait around for the police to raid your house when you can simply steal a couple million dollars and vanish? simple logic, folks

That price is awful steep. If you move to Baghdad and change your name to "Muhammad Is A Common Thief And An Assfuck And I Do Jihad On Islam," maybe we'll do 150. 

I'm very disappointed! They use to be better than that, they totally misunderstood BTC.


Their conclusion is hardly better:


Maybe in Switzerland, people can trust their central bank, but that's not the case in the US or in the EU.

because those bitcoin were used for illegal stuff too and also the amount of money was too high, i don't see other reasons


isn't russia already out of bitcoin, i heard it got banned there

anyway they can't "close" bitcoin, bitcoin is decentralized...this is one of the beauty about bitcoin...ineluctable

I don't really support the idea of widespread private property outdoors in the trespassing sense. I find it to be a value that the offshoots of Europe (e.g. Canada, U.S., Australia, New Zealand, etc.) value more than the Europeans themselves. They are more likely to just freely roam around. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_to_roam

The nudity part doesn't even register with me as being worthy of discussion. But even if they were having a heroin-fueled orgy on the sidewalk, I would just walk around them and that would be that. I grew up around sex, sex toys, drugs, etc. and don't feel psychologically damaged or anything due to having that exposure. The urine you speak of would be concerning. Perhaps a decentralized urine-related ordinance in which people get allowances of x amount of emergency peeing outdoors in y amount of time? And/or perhaps allow unlimited public peeing provided that pee-collection devices are used. But private businesses could set their own rules concerning that.

Stomping out imagined bad behavior before it even exists is interfering with people's lives. If someone's imagination goes wild, that's their own personal issue and they shouldn't drag others into it (and people they don't even know at that). Pattern recognition can be a helpful tool to make sense of the world, but when it's used for making laws, that's called discrimination.