Well i hope you get paid, and i totally agree that payments should be in the listed order. I think this guy runs a few Ponzi's. I've had a good look around and think he might own this one also http://btc-pyramid.com

I got them, thanks! 

That's what I see for a final balance.  Isn't that enough to pay out the 1.4BTC and get things moving again?
I think maybe people are waiting to see if that gets paid out before depositing again?

For some who are asking when will be made the next round of payments. We need more 0.7 BTC and we will do the rest of the outstanding payments. After this the other payments will be faster because they are smaller amounts and I decrease the maximum that can be invested at a time.
We also have the problem of having many similar schemes and some say are automated and thereby being polls.
False information makes no difference if there is no balance you can spend 2-3 days with money stuck to mention here that you know they are being paid. With the other we do not know the situation. WeeklyPonzi came to pass more than 2 days without pay and the NextPonzi this a few hours in the same situation and also will reset the list ie who was not paid lost.

What's interesting to me is how they've moved PayCoin from a cool, sexy idea that had a lot of appeal, but also a lot of experimental components, into one that's not very innovative, but much more likely to be functional out of the gate.

I thought the initial idea was pretty slick, with the tiered system and blockchain compression for the lowest tier of miners. The whole thing looked like something that could actually pull off nearly instant transactions without the blockchain overload for new miners and wallet holders. A lot of that was very new, however, and probably wouldn't have worked perfectly right away.

Now, it's a PoS coin that can support different kinds of value transfers. They could really just clone the NXT codebase with a minor tweak and come up with something that matches the new description. The big difference between PayCoin and NXT is the large fund providing price support. That's really critical. Instead of giving new functionality as well as price support, they're now counting on just price support to pull in consumers and merchants. That's a big advantage, but there isn't the level of new tech they first described.

I'll stick with it for now. Price support is a big deal. But I sure felt a lot better supporting actual innovation, too.

What are your thoughts on the current state of GAW/Paycoin?

Well.. it's common knowledge Volder uses insider knowledge for financial gain. Most likely what he did was induce panic selling to pick up cheap accounts.

That's bad and the hashtalk strict censoring is perhaps one of the biggest red flags IMO.  
As of late anyone who provides any constructive criticism, asks a legitimate question (such as yourself) or lets just call it what it is, isnt a GAW cheerleader is banned/shadow banned or has their comments deleted.

Listen even though we all have our suspicions nobody truly knows if this whole "Paycoin" campaign is legit or not.
-It could be the next big thing.
-It could be a great idea but ruined by incompetence/arrogance (most likely in my opinion)
-It could be a huge scam.

But when you censor anyone who provides any sort of doubt or raises legit questions it screams stay away or get the hell out while you can.
 

This.   I love how market cap numbers are just being thrown around like they are something you can just create and maintain out of thin air.

It's going to be much easier to manage the market cap of a coin then pools and hardware

If you were GAW and the intention was to run a large Ponzi, wouldn't you keep inflating the payouts and charging $49.95 per MH for Prime? Instead they discontinued selling Hashlets for now. Certainly all our questions will be answered in the next month. Do they have the partners they claim? Will Hashcoin launch with the value they are predicting? It certainly is going to be entertaining to watch.