Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 604 results by thekekk
2^Wikipedia - 2292 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_European_countries_by_average_wage
There are at least 5 web sources at the first google search page stating the same for Cyprus
There are at least 5 web sources at the first google search page stating the same for Cyprus
those salaries where maybe true 3-4 years before the haircut. Cyprus now has almost 20% unemployment lawyers and accountants are happy with 850-1200
even the director of the office of the president is not getting payed over 1800
@okaynow: 13-15 full time software developers (https://twitter.com/Papaphoenix/status/455710946057797632) + the "team" + the pretty girls in the office + some more not full time + who knows how many more involved. Average monthly salary in Cyprus 2179 euro (3005$) - http://www.salaryexplorer.com/salary-survey.php?&loctype=1&loc=56. I believe some of the team got much more then the average salary, but I don't have evidence, so I used the average.
average salary 2.1k? looooooool
looool
looool
more like 800
None has forgotten anyone here.
Danny Brewster is officially a wanted man in Cyprus for theft, forgery and False pretenses. 3 Cypriots claiming they lost 90k euro
When Danny actual location is track European Arrest Warrant will be issued
Police have info his either in the UK or Dubai
http://cyprus-mail.com/2014/04/11/cyprus-police-issue-arrest-warrant-for-bitcoin-entrepreneur/
http://www.sigmalive.com/news/local/117372
http://www.livenews.com.cy/cgibin/hweb?-A=44542&-V=news
Danny Brewster is officially a wanted man in Cyprus for theft, forgery and False pretenses. 3 Cypriots claiming they lost 90k euro
When Danny actual location is track European Arrest Warrant will be issued
Police have info his either in the UK or Dubai
http://cyprus-mail.com/2014/04/11/cyprus-police-issue-arrest-warrant-for-bitcoin-entrepreneur/
http://www.sigmalive.com/news/local/117372
http://www.livenews.com.cy/cgibin/hweb?-A=44542&-V=news
Tuur Demeester
@tuurdemeester
@chilin_dude I've refrained from comment so as not to endanger salvage possibilities. News should come out soon, then I'll comment too.
https://twitter.com/tuurdemeester/status/454236929194995712
That's clearly a forgery. It's a business card with Danny's details on it placed ontop of a pass.
And the street name spelling does not match that on the NB website:
'Papakiriakou'
Edit - looks like the website is wrong, correct spelling is with a 'y' not an 'i'.
And the street name spelling does not match that on the NB website:
'Papakiriakou'
Edit - looks like the website is wrong, correct spelling is with a 'y' not an 'i'.
both same in Greek and both correct however
@thekekk: I think it's that nasty btcapples guy, who's really crumbs, who's really MP, who's really me, who, as we have all agreed last thursday, is [am] a sentient gas.
~Phasechange Wall.ru/s
~Phasechange Wall.ru/s
no no your another story crumbs
ooops got you!! porky answering for NotLambchop nice work lad keep it up shill to late to delete
https://www.lmb-holdings.com/ exploited with Heartbleed Bug?
You keep posting US laws that do not apply anywhere
2 companies here one in the UK and one in Cyprus
UK and Cyprus Laws applies.
And based on the exception shareholder/s own 10% can initiate voting.
Is called protection of the minority
2 companies here one in the UK and one in Cyprus
UK and Cyprus Laws applies.
And based on the exception shareholder/s own 10% can initiate voting.
Is called protection of the minority
Companies Law sec321
(2)A provision of a company's articles is void in so far as it would have the effect of making ineffective a demand for a poll on any such question which is made
(a)by not less than 5 members having the right to vote on the resolution; or
(b)by a member or members representing not less than 10% of the total voting rights of all the members having the right to vote on the resolution (excluding any voting rights attached to any shares in the company held as treasury shares); or
(c)by a member or members holding shares in the company conferring a right to vote on the resolution, being shares on which an aggregate sum has been paid up equal to not less than 10% of the total sum paid up on all the shares conferring that right (excluding shares in the company conferring a right to vote on the resolution which are held as treasury shares).
@freedomno1 Your facts are nowhere near true
(2)A provision of a company's articles is void in so far as it would have the effect of making ineffective a demand for a poll on any such question which is made
(a)by not less than 5 members having the right to vote on the resolution; or
(b)by a member or members representing not less than 10% of the total voting rights of all the members having the right to vote on the resolution (excluding any voting rights attached to any shares in the company held as treasury shares); or
(c)by a member or members holding shares in the company conferring a right to vote on the resolution, being shares on which an aggregate sum has been paid up equal to not less than 10% of the total sum paid up on all the shares conferring that right (excluding shares in the company conferring a right to vote on the resolution which are held as treasury shares).
@freedomno1 Your facts are nowhere near true
of course there are no voting rights you cannot just vote if you buy 1 share. In order to vote you need to have high %
The vast majority of shares are ordinary shares which carry a right to one vote per share. There may, however, be different classes of shares which may have no voting rights or restricted rights
However any five or more members, or the holders of not less than 10% of the voting rights can demand a poll
The vast majority of shares are ordinary shares which carry a right to one vote per share. There may, however, be different classes of shares which may have no voting rights or restricted rights
However any five or more members, or the holders of not less than 10% of the voting rights can demand a poll
Mr. Brewster's fiancée is British living temporary in Cyprus,not Cypriot.
Thanks for the clarification!I understand that the details of his personal life are not relevant in general. However, since he is not Cypriot himself (and does not speak Greek), it would have been relevant to know whether he chose Cyprus because it provided the best market/environment for Neo & Bee, or for purely personal reasons.
For how long had he been living in Cyprus before he launched the N&B project?
Cyprus is a good choice of location to start a company in Europe because of only 10% tax on company income
12.5% after Troika but still very low
Someones put in a buy order for 600k+ shares. You think he knows something we don't? That's a huge gamble if he doesn't.
51% attack?
I'm not an expert either, but here's a start:
There are different types of bankruptcies (in US Chapter 7, Chapter 11, 13 etc., etc.) under Chapter 7, a debtor surrenders his non-exempt property, under Chapter 13 he retains it. It's not trivial stuff, and "bankruptcy" is just a catch-all term. Anyhow, no one filed for bankruptcy AFAIK.
This presupposes actual shares, these shares don't represent partial ownership of Neo, but "shares of the profit.' This makes bankruptcy the worst-case scenario for Neo shareholders -- they are explicitly not entitled to any post-liquidation residual value.
Quote
Upon bankruptcy, a firm will be required to sell all of its assets and pay off all debts. The usual order of debt repayment, in terms of the lender, will be the government, financial institutions, other creditors (i.e. suppliers and utility companies), bondholders, preferred shareholders and, finally, common shareholders. The common shareholders are last because they have a residual claim on the assets in the firm and are a tier below the preferred stock classification. Common shareholders often receive nothing at all, as there is usually very little left over once a firm has paid its debts.
http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/06/bankruptpublicfirm.aspThere are different types of bankruptcies (in US Chapter 7, Chapter 11, 13 etc., etc.) under Chapter 7, a debtor surrenders his non-exempt property, under Chapter 13 he retains it. It's not trivial stuff, and "bankruptcy" is just a catch-all term. Anyhow, no one filed for bankruptcy AFAIK.
This presupposes actual shares, these shares don't represent partial ownership of Neo, but "shares of the profit.' This makes bankruptcy the worst-case scenario for Neo shareholders -- they are explicitly not entitled to any post-liquidation residual value.
We call it winding-up here.
But my question to you is how did you knew that Danny fled Cyprus for his safety?
and you kept posting here that he fled..
Are you involved with the threads that Danny received?
Five Red Flags that Preceded Neo & Bee's Collapse
http://hackingdistributed.com/2014/04/05/another-one-bites-the-dust-neo-bee/
http://hackingdistributed.com/2014/04/05/another-one-bites-the-dust-neo-bee/
The only red flag here is you
we have multi billions companies incorporated in Cyprus
take for example VIBER or
Lanebrook (owned by Abramovich)
and the list go on
You are trading on an licenced Panamanian exchange in shares of a company illegally funded by US investors, just where do laws come into this? Whose laws? US? Cyprus? Panama?
Things kids say
Things kids say
Said MP's shill who's about to be extradited to US to face charges. Sweet irony and double standards. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=553092.0
Havelock is actually a registered company while MPEx is just one dude and some paid shills, who doesn't even have a registered company behind it.
Learn the difference between a registered company and a licenced exchange. Registering a company is trivial, becoming a licensed exchange isn't. Havelock is not a licenced exchange.
@thekekk: Your incoherent sentence fails to answer my question, that being: Whose laws are being broken and what laws are those?
@minerpart: Lay off the glue and return to your containment thread, where you may continue with your failings.
You don't seem to understand the difference between company and registered company let alone everything else.
You can pick either UK law or Cyprus law both laws are the same Cyprus law copied from UK. Read the articles of association.
You are trading on an licenced Panamanian exchange in shares of a company illegally funded by US investors, just where do laws come into this? Whose laws? US? Cyprus? Panama?
Things kids say
Things kids say
If that was the case SEC will have not make any enquiries to anyone neither MPEX
Doesn't really matter if the CEO has quit the company still belongs to the shareholders, the scary think now is that Havelock is trading shares of a multimillion company for peanuts. And anyone with 320 btc can take control of the company.
the shares have no voting rights + the shares available havelock are less than 50% of the company.
Not only that, but the company doesn't belong to the shareholders and never did. The shares are shares in *the profits* of Neo, not in the company itself. Do folks even bother reading before giving away their coin?
On the other hand i do wonder why people assume that NEOBEEQ = NEOBEE.
Neo and bee shareholder is LMB Holdings, people pay for LMB Holdings shares.
"shares" are representative of ownership in one company. Laws cannot change by rules
They probably add the Q to avoid lawsuits