Please contact support@crypto.games with suggestions/requests regarding our games..

---

Looking at your code... the only time it will end up as chance=49 is when the lastBet.Roll was <3.3 or > 96.7 AND it was a loss...

The "if !win then... else..." block you have means that if it was a win... it sets nextbet = balance /1024 and then chance is set to 97.2549.

So currently, will only work if it is < 3.3... as you're betting "high" to start by default, if the roll is over 96.7 you'll win and the chance won't change.

You'll have to show your full script... there is obviously something elsewhere in your script which is overriding your chance setting that is done in the if (< 3 or > 97) block...

There is no way it should have reset to 97% unless there is another code branch setting the chance somwhere.

You'll have to show your full script... there is obviously something elsewhere in your script which is overriding your chance setting that is done in the if (< 3 or > 97) block...

There is no way it should have reset to 97% unless there is another code branch setting the chance somwhere.

Lol, i probably could have just looked up how to do a print function, but it all looked good to me so I didn't. Lemme try that one.

Yeah... I'm an idiot... but, in my defense, I've been doing mostly Python programming lately!! The correct the syntax for "combining" multiple outputs for a print() statement in LUA is ".." not ","

Try:

As in, it created a syntax error and the script didn't run or it just didn't print anything out into the console window?


Also, my bad with the typo!

I don't see anything obviously wrong with the code.

The only thing I can think of is that the site you're using the bot with is setting the roll value to some bizarre value?

Maybe add a "print" statement in to debug what the value of lastBet.Roll actually is. It should output to the Bot's console window.

Then you understood me wrong. Once again, and I hope for the last time: profit on graph is actual profit paid out to investors. It is amount that investors got.

EDIT: I found one issue with graph... minesweeper data was not visible, have added that one to graph.

So logic is simple:
Profit in investment graph is: SUM(amount_dice+amount_slot+amount_blackjack+amount_videopoker+amount_roulette+amount_plinko+amount_mines-expenses) as profit

Data is taken from investments_details table, that has data of every single invesment profit paid to investors since the start of investment option on site. Data is grouped by dates, so each calculation that happens between 00:00:00 and 23:59:59 is grouped together.

Profit column is actual data that was paid to investors. So if all investors would sum their daily earnings on all of their invesments it would match with graph.

Expenses column is sum of referrer and faucet rewards, investors pay 70% and site pays 30% of those expenses (its has already 30% share cut as that happens in investments calculation).

amount_dice+amount_slot+amount_blackjack+amount_videopoker+amount_roulette+amount_plinko+amount_mines is profit or loss per game.

All data is visible on page:
https://www.crypto-games.net/details.aspx?type=investment&id=LONGID

Replace LONGID with your personal longid.

Either way I need to optimize this graph as investments_details table has grow big and calculations of graph takes a lot of computing power, and bankroll data is not calculated properly...


EDIT2: Ok found one more issue with graph

As you can see on investments_details page expenses are always in negative values, so there is a issue with upper formula. It should be:
SUM(amount_dice+amount_slot+amount_blackjack+amount_videopoker+amount_roulette+amount_plinko+amount_mines+expenses) as profit

Not

SUM(amount_dice+amount_slot+amount_blackjack+amount_videopoker+amount_roulette+amount_plinko+amount_mines-expenses) as profit

Sorry for that, my bad. But after all investments are calculated correctly, just there were two graph issues that are fixed now. Bankroll size issue on graph will get fixed soon as it requires more changes.

EDIT3: Bankroll size issue is resolved too. Now bankroll size won't change for old investments.

It's not misleading. you would get the same result as on graph if you would own 100% of bankroll all the time. But bankroll is changing literally every minute.

Want to test your luck and try to win big?  Right now is an excellent time to try YOLOdice, since you could win some extra prizes!  YOLOdice features a whole slew of great things like three coins to play (Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Ethereum), an instant on-site exchange, three Progressive Jackpots, Seuntjie's DiceBot support, Night Mode, super security and privacy settings, fast bets, rakeback on your wagered, and loads more with just a 1% House Edge!  Here are some helpful links to get you started:

YOLOdice Website: https://YOLOdice.com
Our BitcoinTalk Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1674772.0
Our Twitter: https://twitter.com/yolodicegame

Hmm, I don't know about that though. Even 5th (or last) place in the wagering contests of some of the less popular coins is pretty much unattainable for regular players.
Some examples:

5th place for Stratis: 10,447 STRAT = 15879 USD
5th place for Peercoin: 2,859 PPC = 3202 USD
5th place for Ethereum Classic: 872 ETC = 10812 USD
5th place for NEOGas: 243 GAS = 1372 USD
5th place for Dash: 9.04 DASH = 1292 USD
7th place for Dogecoin: 5,509,476 DOGE = 13184 USD
5th place for Monero: 12.75 XMR = 1199 USD
7th place for Litecoin: 205.08 LTC = 11638 USD

If you're just gambling a couple of hundred USD worth of crypto every month or so, you'll never get any prize.
I'd call someone like that a small regular player.

Edit:
I do have to add that I think there are still enough promotions for occasional gamblers. I mean everybody always has an equal chance at the CG birthday and holiday events.
So I don't mind too much that the wagering competitions are pretty much reserved for the high rollers. That's the whole point of having a wagering competition IMO.