Search content
Sort by
Showing 7 of 7 results by thongexiphstaff
Re: The same team created their fourth project, BLACER coin
Re: LOGISCOIN ask to pump their thread 2-3 times a day and give coin against merit
Scam accusation!
The same team created their fourth project, BLACER coin
The same team created their fourth project, BLACER coin
The same team created their fourth project, BLACER coin
Interesting finding for all of us.
There are a team created their fourth project.
This time, they launched the Blacer coin project
The OP of Blacer coin project has nearly same design of their past three projects' OPs.
Light Pay Coin
Logis Coin
LRM Coin
Some parts in the OP, such as coin specification, profit diagram, roadmap, join us, list of available translation languages are almost the same.
I don't check, but I guess that the address of Blacer coin company office is of a dentist clinic.
There is another topic on their past three projects:
[SCAM] LGS, LPC, LRM - All 3 from same team - All of them are pure SCAM
Is it a scam one, another new scam one from the same team?
There are a team created their fourth project.
This time, they launched the Blacer coin project
The OP of Blacer coin project has nearly same design of their past three projects' OPs.
Light Pay Coin
Logis Coin
LRM Coin
Some parts in the OP, such as coin specification, profit diagram, roadmap, join us, list of available translation languages are almost the same.
I don't check, but I guess that the address of Blacer coin company office is of a dentist clinic.
There is another topic on their past three projects:
[SCAM] LGS, LPC, LRM - All 3 from same team - All of them are pure SCAM
Is it a scam one, another new scam one from the same team?
Re: [TOP-200] Members who have a lot of earned sMerits
Maybe OP needs to put one more column with "Last Active:"
Most of the top haven't been online for quite some time and probably will not come back, like Satoshi and Hal.
Ah, I have already made it, then found your thread.Most of the top haven't been online for quite some time and probably will not come back, like Satoshi and Hal.
Here you go:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5084723.msg48676345#msg48676345
I doubt that zentdex got permanent ban!
He made great constructive topics, so I don't believe that he got banned.
I will start my own topic for tracking users earned lots of merits, then turned into last active (busy, leave the forum, permanent bans, and other reasons).
Re: Top 200 Merit receivers without Merit from the Top 200 Merit receivers
Results by screening from the The list without Merit sent by the Top 200 Merit Receivers, what I got on guys who have been inactive for too long (months) or last post maded long time ago; or already been nuked.
1) nullius, ranked 16th; last active day on April 24, 2018, 11:02:30 PM [one of the most genius guys who fastly earned merits in early weeks after the first day of merit system].
2) pitipawn, ranked 42th; last active day on March 11, 2018, 03:28:11 AM
3) DannyHamilton, ranked 59th; last active day on September 24, 2018, 01:39:55 PM
4) RichDaniel, ranked 99th; last active day on August 17, 2018, 05:16:08 PM
5) zentdex, ranked 112th; last active day on December 12, 2018, 01:36:46 PM; last post published on July 12, 2018, 05:35:59 AM.
6) Ajpa94, ranked 127th, nuked; last active day on June 23, 2018, 01:34:00 AM.
7) Hal, ranked 138th; last active day on March 29, 2017, 06:22:58 PM [R.I.P].
8> TERA2, ranked 163th; last active day on July 18, 2018, 04:06:38 PM.
In a nutshell, amongst the top 200 Merit Receivers, there are 8 cases (4%) that probably inactive accounts.
One case just woke up recent days (zentdex).
One case has been nuked in June (Ajpa94).
I don't know merit abusers accused by nuking as official rule of the forum or not. I searched and found that merit abusers will only be tagged red, not banned.
Anyone known it, please help me.
1) nullius, ranked 16th; last active day on April 24, 2018, 11:02:30 PM [one of the most genius guys who fastly earned merits in early weeks after the first day of merit system].
2) pitipawn, ranked 42th; last active day on March 11, 2018, 03:28:11 AM
3) DannyHamilton, ranked 59th; last active day on September 24, 2018, 01:39:55 PM
4) RichDaniel, ranked 99th; last active day on August 17, 2018, 05:16:08 PM
5) zentdex, ranked 112th; last active day on December 12, 2018, 01:36:46 PM; last post published on July 12, 2018, 05:35:59 AM.
6) Ajpa94, ranked 127th, nuked; last active day on June 23, 2018, 01:34:00 AM.
7) Hal, ranked 138th; last active day on March 29, 2017, 06:22:58 PM [R.I.P].
8> TERA2, ranked 163th; last active day on July 18, 2018, 04:06:38 PM.
In a nutshell, amongst the top 200 Merit Receivers, there are 8 cases (4%) that probably inactive accounts.
One case just woke up recent days (zentdex).
One case has been nuked in June (Ajpa94).
I don't know merit abusers accused by nuking as official rule of the forum or not. I searched and found that merit abusers will only be tagged red, not banned.
Anyone known it, please help me.
Re: Alternative statistics of user registrations on Bitcointalk 2017-2018
For the stats in December 2017 between the topic figure and the forum official stats.
I known the reason, that is due to the lack of official stat on Dec 2017 (only counted till the 13th December 2017, or nearly the first half of the Dec, not a full Dec).
Therefore, it's normal to see the big difference between topic stats and forum official stats.
Have you known why?
If you known it, can you share it here, please.
I known the reason, that is due to the lack of official stat on Dec 2017 (only counted till the 13th December 2017, or nearly the first half of the Dec, not a full Dec).
Therefore, it's normal to see the big difference between topic stats and forum official stats.
Comparing your stats to the forums oficial stats (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=stats) there are a few discrepancies:
< ... >
- December 2017 is off quite a bit (191 537 vs 63 756 official)
Decembers number of registered users seems a bit small on the official stats, considering that BTC peaked on the 16th of December, so I always wondered if they were correct for December 2017. I've just seen that, oddly enough, they only go up to the 13 of December (clicking the detail on the official Stats), so yours seem coherent with events.
< ... >
- December 2017 is off quite a bit (191 537 vs 63 756 official)
Decembers number of registered users seems a bit small on the official stats, considering that BTC peaked on the 16th of December, so I always wondered if they were correct for December 2017. I've just seen that, oddly enough, they only go up to the 13 of December (clicking the detail on the official Stats), so yours seem coherent with events.
Have you known why?
If you known it, can you share it here, please.
Quote
Forum official stats are not available for some reason for 2018.