Search content
Sort by
Showing 15 of 15 results by thorjag
Re: 「魚池」BTC:340PH - LTC:400GH - ETH:300GH - Mine 1 BTC, Get 10 NMC+10 HUC+100 SYS
We are celebrating our 3rd anniversary today.
Congrats! Will you be running 0.12.1 soon to make sure we get BIP68/112/113 activation ASAP?
I have recently installed mycelium on my phone, but am having some issues regarding privacy. I want to restore my old wallet, but before I do I want to enable syncing the wallet via tor. This is not possible AFAIK.
I tried doing a workaround by creating a new wallet, enabling tor and then restoring my backup, but I cannot find any way to restore a backup after I have created a new wallet.
I tried doing a workaround by creating a new wallet, enabling tor and then restoring my backup, but I cannot find any way to restore a backup after I have created a new wallet.
Yeah I don't think libbitcoinconsensus will be ready anytime soon. From what I understand it is just a first step with the 0.10 release and more needs to be done. I was merely wondering if you had planned (or at least thought about) ditching core when it is finished and deemed safe to use. Good to know that you are thinking about it 
1. Long time ago since I heard about trezor compatability in armory. How is it going?
2. Will Armory eventually use libbitcoinconsesus and ditch the dependency it has on bitcoin core?
2. Will Armory eventually use libbitcoinconsesus and ditch the dependency it has on bitcoin core?
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't PoS require the miners to keep their private keys online on the machine doing block validation? Isn't this a major security flaw, since if a vulnerability in the software is found that allows an attacker to extract the private key, he can clean out pretty much all miners wallets, making it a breeze to gain >50% stake?
Re: Full node on a raspberry pi with blockchain data on a samba share
Thanks for the help.
There is nothing wrong with the permissions. I am able to read/write from/to the share without issues.
I tried symlinking, as you suggested, but with the same results...
Will definately check out the memory optimizations once I get up and running. Thanks for the tip.
There is nothing wrong with the permissions. I am able to read/write from/to the share without issues.
I tried symlinking, as you suggested, but with the same results...
Will definately check out the memory optimizations once I get up and running. Thanks for the tip.
Full node on a raspberry pi with blockchain data on a samba share
I am trying to get a full node running on a raspberry pi. However, because of the storage requirements I dont want to save the blockchain locally, which means I mounted a remote share which included the blockchain data files. When starting bitcoind I get the following error message:
More verbose from the log file:
When running bitcoind with a local datadir it runs as normal with no error message. Someone who might know what the issue might be?
I am running a slim archlinux install and mounted the remote share with:
Code:
:
Error opening block database.
Do you want to rebuild the block database now?
Error opening block database.
Do you want to rebuild the block database now?
More verbose from the log file:
Code:
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Bitcoin version v0.9.3.0-g40d2041-beta (Mon, 22 Sep 2014 16:42:15 +0200)
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1j 15 Oct 2014
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Using BerkeleyDB version Berkeley DB 5.3.28: (September 9, 2013)
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Default data directory /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Using data directory /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Using at most 125 connections (1024 file descriptors available)
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Using wallet wallet.dat
2014-10-16 19:52:36 init message: Verifying wallet...
2014-10-16 19:52:36 CDBEnv::Open : LogDir=/home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/database ErrorFile=/home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/db.log
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Bound to [::]:8333
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Bound to 0.0.0.0:8333
2014-10-16 19:52:37 init message: Loading block index...
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Opening LevelDB in /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/blocks/index
2014-10-16 19:52:37 IO error: /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/blocks/index: Invalid argument
2014-10-16 19:52:37 : Error opening block database.
Do you want to rebuild the block database now?
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Aborted block database rebuild. Exiting.
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Shutdown : In progress...
2014-10-16 19:52:37 StopNode()
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Shutdown : done
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Using OpenSSL version OpenSSL 1.0.1j 15 Oct 2014
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Using BerkeleyDB version Berkeley DB 5.3.28: (September 9, 2013)
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Default data directory /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Using data directory /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Using at most 125 connections (1024 file descriptors available)
2014-10-16 19:52:36 Using wallet wallet.dat
2014-10-16 19:52:36 init message: Verifying wallet...
2014-10-16 19:52:36 CDBEnv::Open : LogDir=/home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/database ErrorFile=/home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/db.log
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Bound to [::]:8333
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Bound to 0.0.0.0:8333
2014-10-16 19:52:37 init message: Loading block index...
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Opening LevelDB in /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/blocks/index
2014-10-16 19:52:37 IO error: /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/blocks/index: Invalid argument
2014-10-16 19:52:37 : Error opening block database.
Do you want to rebuild the block database now?
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Aborted block database rebuild. Exiting.
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Shutdown : In progress...
2014-10-16 19:52:37 StopNode()
2014-10-16 19:52:37 Shutdown : done
When running bitcoind with a local datadir it runs as normal with no error message. Someone who might know what the issue might be?
I am running a slim archlinux install and mounted the remote share with:
Code:
mount.cifs ///bitcoin /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin -o username=,uid=bitcoin
Thanks for the tip. Didn't know Bitcoin Wallet could do that. However last I heard Bitcoin Wallet doesn't support encryption of the private keys, HD Wallets or watch-only addresses. But good to know in case they fix those things in future updates.
I was planning to connect to my node through my VPN, so no issues there.
I was planning to connect to my node through my VPN, so no issues there.
I was wondering if there is any highly configurable SPV client for Android? The most important thing I want to configure is what nodes I should connect to, i.e, my own node, as this would provide me with greater financial privacy when broadcasting transactions. Or maybe if there is a client that may include this feature some day?