Why do you think so? Originally, "whitepaper" is a term that comes from a scientific background. Some early projects had a scientific whitepaper, because they had a scientific background that explored the possibilities of blockchain technology. Investors liked it, so people started imitating it. Nowadays, what is called a whitepaper is nothing more than a brochure of what the coin offers. Maybe some technical details. No quality control whatsoever, no guarantees of correctness or coherency. Most so-called whitepapers have a very low quality.
This project does not have a scientific background, and we don't claim to have. We have a practical background. We know the technical details, and we do have a vision. We do not have a brochure of it yet. If you like to know some technical details, or if the vision is unclear, you are free to ask and someone will try to answer it as good as possible.
In the meanwhile, I am trying to give a more detailed overview of what the coin offers on this wiki page:
http://coinwiki.info/en/SpectreCoinJBG is working on extending the website to include more info as well. And at some point, we will have a brochure called whitepaper that will summarize it once again.

Thanks Gandalf86, to point out the problem with whitpapers in cryptoworld...everyone asking for whitepaper without having the notion about what a whitepaper is!
EDIT:
I proposed several times in different projects to publish green papers instead as a alternative and also to initiate a participatory/bottom-up process with the community, to give the possibility to create a common sense, shared vision, etc...no one cared about, I support your conclusion regarding the low quality of those so called "whitepapers"...thanks again, it makes me happy to see that there is people out there thinking similar!
