hi

i have strange issue with dogecoin 1.6

when i send dogecoins sometimes on my list transactions appears 1Wh4bh   instead real send address.

network see real dogecoin address. and on https://dogechain.info/chain/Dogecoin  transaction looks ok

but when i use listtransactions send addres is wrong.,


this send addres appears after while (for few second on local list transaction adres is ok, and after while change to 1Wh4bh    or other)


what should i do ?

polmine.pl use coinbase text "by polmine.pl"
eg
https://blockchain.info/tx/b11231cd6edfed2364c896a0b5b528af9026eadb41e8b5a78d80af1b36a39559?show_adv=true

BFL  lies, and again and again
 
http://imgur.com/a/Tvjc6
 
and now they blocked  forums.butterflylabs.com   no more user can register ... 

why no one has not sued BFL ? This is a multi-million dollar fraud, thousands of users have been  deceived !! and still nothing

where is famous for justice in the U.S.?

instead hardware, another lies

but i cant send namecoin to other wallet,
because allmost all NMC transfers are unconfirmed
i have send about 150 NMC in about 10 transaction but only one of them has been confirmed

and my balance is zero, with almost 150 NMC frozen in unconfirmed transactions


and i have this transaction

2012-05-10 13:46:09 stdClass Object
(
    [account] =>
    [address] => NHoMvrubGAUS24E34uzKHtCfrmfCGKApvb
    [category] => send
    [amount] => -165.97
    [fee] => 150.00300512
    [confirmations] => 63801
   [txid] => 564cfe4e1d5b1c057c2821eb090cbc2079d346fa92949ef6de7069abd56b874f
    [time] => 1336650369
)


2012-05-10 13:46:09 stdClass Object
(
    [account] =>
    [address] => NKD7PyEaF1teCHw97ByeNN4Zv5jSEBNhvL
    [category] => send
    [amount] => -34.03550512
    [fee] => 150.00300512
    [confirmations] => 63801
    [txid] => 564cfe4e1d5b1c057c2821eb090cbc2079d346fa92949ef6de7069abd56b874f
    [time] => 1336650369
)

with VERY expensive transaction fee....

I deleted a few transactions so at least my balance is not zero, but it still tries to send something its hanging some of the transaction without confirmation,

2013-06-28 20:23:44 stdClass Object
(
    [account] =>
    [address] => N4CFbYVGkbQSwGN1pYYDGwymVcL3vYZ6ug
    [category] => send
    [amount] => -1.1
    [fee] => 0
    [confirmations] => 15
    [txid] => 012c34896c7888f6ebafa6aabfa1856e90cb4a1cf9506cc64823ebe65dc47469
    [time] => 1372443824
)
2013-06-28 20:23:45 stdClass Object
(
    [account] =>
    [address] => N4CFbYVGkbQSwGN1pYYDGwymVcL3vYZ6ug
    [category] => send
    [amount] => -1.1
    [fee] => -0.005
    [confirmations] => 0
    [txid] => bdd05074dc18eb37c75168d62789ee20deb0156096354947ac97333a00d5247d
    [time] => 1372443825
)

and again,

what should i do  ?

I have this transaction in namecoind  (unconfirmed for two months ?!? )


2013-05-06 16:45:49

stdClass Object
(
    [account] =>
    [address] => NEh8xThvytdvrMxY5WpZA6Ju3KP55NmkaN
    [category] => send
    [amount] => -48.22
    [fee] => -0.005
    [confirmations] => 0
    [txid] => e4b34b09daed7cc35b64924d76ac0aff8bf7a450c8f83ecca1fd10778a3fb4ba
    [time] => 1367851549
)


namecoind
 'version' => 35000
 'blocks' => 119131,
 'connections' => 11,
 'difficulty' => 7872315.7429868,
 'hashespersec' => 0, 'testnet' => false,
 'keypoololdest' => 1316278664,
 'paytxfee' => 0, 'mininput' => 0.0001,
 'errors' => '', ))



so namecoind is up to date, but why this transaction (and few next ) are stil unconfirmed ?

u use rescan , but it doesnot help

is there any way to confirm this transaction ?


UPDATE:

I can Pay 10  NMC for HELP

Bitcoin centralization is bad, and that's what companies such as ASICminer do !
big power / hashrarte in one hand !

when will the change in BitCoin  algorithm eliminates ASICs ?

-rescan helps

thanks

but it was trange, all receive transaction was confirmed (in one minute )
, but all send transactions hang for over 20 minutes...

i use standard configuration without any modyfications ...

yes i can list it
transaction is on transaction list but still unconfirmed


is there any chans to send bitcoin from this wallet ?
or BTC ar lost ?

i have downloaded new version os bitcoind 0.8.2
after syncing with the network, i have move all .bitcoin dir to another machine

receive transactions works ok .

BUT  send CANNOT send bitcoins send transaction are unconfirmed...


in logs i see ERROR: CTxMemPool::accept() : nonstandard transaction type

what should i do ?

please post your config with Sharelogging section

i have the same with BASH, python 3.2 , on ubuntu 12.

commenting CoinbaserCmd, may help but it isn't good solution...

yes  many thanks
merged mining work ! (but i dont find any block yet )

but from time to time i get


is it something with multithreading in eloipool  ?

yes , i saw

README:
and in config.py

and thats ALL...


 

SO
finall configuration



is it ok ?

ok it is easy


ok, thats easy too but


which params (MMP url, MMP host, MMP port ? )

in eloipool makes that eloipool talks to MMP ? 

or my configuration


is ok, and i should just point miner to eloipool (port 9947 ) , instead  MMP (port 8330)   ?

so we have this configuration




mining proxy command


eloipool config.py





namecoind config



and normal configuracjion connection to bitcoin




why i cannot connect /point miner to 8330 port ? and still get this errors



miner with eloipool works perfect

but with merged mining configuracion still cannot connect minner to mining proxy ...

what should i change in my configuration  ?

[/quote]

so if     is WRONG


how to connect eloipool to bitcoind AND to mining proxy  ? 
i see that normally mining proxy "split" connection into two daemon (BTC, NMC)

but how to do this in eloipool ?

you mean


client miner  <---->  eloipool <----->    mining proxy <----> bitcoind
                                                                 |
                                                                  | ---->   namecond



so i must use patched bitcoind (with setworkaux function) ?

or maybe




client miner  <---->  eloipool <----->    mining proxy <----> eloipool  <--- > bitcoind
                                                                 |
                                                                  | ---->   namecond


?

idont understand your suggestion


maybe it should be


1)
client minrer <--->  mining proxy <--> eloipool  <---->   bitcoind
                                    |
                                     | -------> namecoind ?



or


2)

client miner  <---->  eloipool <----->    mining proxy <----> bitcoind
                                                                 |
                                                                  | ---->   namecond




mining proxy need setworkaux so i think 1) will be ok  ?

so why in first scenario i get errors on client miner ?