I think if someone can fork this coin and make a new wallet with new road map with some idea, then this coin will be live again and can get it back on exchanges.
Usually the only reason some one does this is to generate a whole new generation of bag holders. I've got a small bag. It's worth zero. Thats the risk of crypto. But if someone wants to revive the coin, someone can have my little bag dumped on them.
If someone has a big enough bag they might do it. But they are probably to busy created pre-mined ICO's for people to invest in.
Brought SAF-chain online/running again. Made some instances and fired up the chain by solo-mining. Now take it and make the best out of it.
lg t.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT OPTIONAL UPDATE AVAILABLE 0.30.19.8
by
tombcoin
on 16/03/2016, 09:20:29 UTC
There are two chains on the net. Which one will be the right one? lg t.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | URGENT UPDATE Dec. 11 2015
by
tombcoin
on 16/12/2015, 07:52:35 UTC
Hi Bitcc, great news for the moment. I will try and report later on.
lg t.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | URGENT UPDATE Dec. 11 2015
by
tombcoin
on 14/12/2015, 17:23:50 UTC
Set up a fresh installed headless Linux with latest git. New version of BCR does only connect to: 176.56.238.121:8877 with the result: connect() to 176.56.238.121:8877 failed after select(): Connection refused (111) socket recv error Connection reset by peer (104)
I didn´t set anything additional in bitcredit.conf. Only rpcuser and rpcpassword which is needed for daemon to run.
Is this a wanted config?
lg t.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | URGENT UPDATE Dec. 11 2015
by
tombcoin
on 14/12/2015, 11:57:33 UTC
I got the same problems with my BNs: 2015-12-14 11:25:38 UpdateTip: new best=000eec7c4c1fd2c1d488dc74d7ac80fa8829a41d3c02c01dae8ac2c87e11970a height=266996 log2_work=35.947744 tx=276481 date=2015-12-13 20:31:37 progress=0.991034 cache=2583 2015-12-14 11:25:38 ERROR: ConnectBlock(): coinbase key detected in last 40 blocks 2015-12-14 11:25:38 Misbehaving: 91.230.123.86:8877 (0 -> 100) BAN THRESHOLD EXCEEDED 2015-12-14 11:25:38 InvalidChainFound: invalid block=000944bcc77a8e9a81a4b3fc673dda17627830dd1a03bae35c974e580831cc9c height=266997 log2_work=35.947744
lg t.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | UPDATE 08/10/15 | BID ON THE CHAIN | VOTE | ESCROW | WORK FOR COINS
by
tombcoin
on 04/12/2015, 09:16:05 UTC
Didn´t get an error like this on my ubuntu. Only thing that changed is sqlite: sudo apt-get install sqlite3 libsqlite3-dev Then it should work. Try to delete the local git-rep and clone new from github. Then try again to compile. lg t.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | UPDATE 08/10/15 | BID ON THE CHAIN | VOTE | ESCROW | WORK FOR COINS
by
tombcoin
on 03/12/2015, 14:11:05 UTC
There are still different chains on the net. At least 3 that I can see. Will it solve by itsself? lg t.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | UPDATE 08/10/15 | BID ON THE CHAIN | VOTE | ESCROW | WORK FOR COINS
by
tombcoin
on 02/12/2015, 21:41:42 UTC
Still no luck with the new wallet. I tried headless daemon and qt-wallet each on a fresh built linux. On each connect there is always this error: 'socket recv error Connection reset by peer (104)' And remote peer disconnects. Any suggestions?
lg t.
Forgot version: v0.30.19.0-f8911fe
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | UPDATE 08/10/15 | BID ON THE CHAIN | VOTE | ESCROW | WORK FOR COINS
by
tombcoin
on 02/12/2015, 10:31:47 UTC
Hi, thanks for the bootstrap. But... is there a new client? balances.dat now placed in folder 'ratings' miners.dat is missing. New: rawdata.db What is the matter with this? I think that old clients can´t do anything with it.
lg t.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | UPDATE 08/10/15 | BID ON THE CHAIN | VOTE | ESCROW | WORK FOR COINS
by
tombcoin
on 01/12/2015, 17:26:51 UTC
The question is, 'what will be the correct bootstrap?' Now I can see three chains on the run. 258879 258722 and 258714 lg t.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | UPDATE 08/10/15 | BID ON THE CHAIN | VOTE | ESCROW | WORK FOR COINS
by
tombcoin
on 01/12/2015, 10:08:53 UTC
I can see 2 chains with state of: blocks" : 258714, and blocks" : 258721,
which one will be choosen?
lg t.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | UPDATE 08/10/15 | BID ON THE CHAIN | VOTE | ESCROW | WORK FOR COINS
by
tombcoin
on 13/11/2015, 09:47:42 UTC
Hello, some news apart from the massive price drop? lg t.
Problems with fresh sync are still there. This should be solved.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | UPDATE 08/10/15 | BID ON THE CHAIN | VOTE | ESCROW | WORK FOR COINS
I changed that logic users now use the miningkeys.dat file with the required keys for mining.
Can confirm that it works. But it seems that it does not take the keys one by one. It think is just hopping between the first keys. Since chainz is behind, I just decoded some blocks by hand.
Also put no comments behind the keys nor between the lines in the miningkey.dat. Throws out an error: wrong key lg t.
Post
Topic
BoardAnnouncements (Altcoins)
Re: BITCREDIT | UPDATE 25/09/15 | BID ON THE CHAIN | VOTE | ESCROW | WORK FOR COINS