Search content
Sort by
Showing 11 of 11 results by tome3000
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
In remaining time doesn't seem to get required votes to overtake already leading projects on Binance voting but still good for exposure of coin to let people know about it. There is not awareness about this under the radar flying coin and not everyone knows its history. It will be great if somehow if RVN gets listed on one of the top exchanges.
Hhahhahahaaaa... Exposure??? Exposure? This Binance vote is like the kind of exposure where #1, #2, #3 gets full squirt jizz while Ravencoin being near the bottom gets a regurgitated few drops. Clean yourself up and act respectable. Don't go around with your tongue hanging out.
why are talking like a asshole? cant you talk like human being with respect for other
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
So whoever can, should vote for Raven on community coin of the month on binance
https://www.binance.com/vote.html
https://www.binance.com/vote.html
done
me to .now dear members vote !
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
certainly, but also a really high barrier of entry ($$$ + tech/coding knowledge). GPUs, ASICs are a child's play compared to setup a FPGAs
The guy is making the software easy to use by anyone. But for doing all the work, 4% dev fee. They are also working with the manufacturers to make FPGAs designed for mining and doing bulk buys to reduce the price.
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Concerning FPGA's Will it be ridiculously expensive to use? I'm understanding that you need an ASIC for each algo (16 different ASICs) and then the FPGA to control them. Only one ASIC would be used at a time wasting 15 other ASICs.
Hopefully nobody's stupid enough to try such thing. I don't even need to mention that using them separately would be more profitable and even if someone does it, devs will just make a modification on the algo and ruin his whole setup so It won't be an issue as far as I see.
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Can this coin be 20$ in 10 years? I have 14081.59990099
In ten years anything is possible. It sure would be nice. I just mined my first 1000 RVN.
if somepme will made a fpga for this then no more gpu mining for this to . as it worse than asic . do you think its possible for this algo ? maybe hard but i read that it can be done to bed its only asic proof and no fpga proof or am i wrong ?.
Re: [ANN] Avermore miner - optimized sgminer (AMD) fork for x16r/x16s/xevan(beta)
hi nice pepole
can someone help set a fail over for this ? . tried the folowing with no luck :
my bat : sgminer.exe --gpu-platform=2 --config failover.conf -w 64 -g 2 -X 256 --no-submit-stale
my conf :
{
"pools": [
{
"name": "Raven minepool",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://minepool.com:3636",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
},
{
"name": "Raven Yiimp",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://yiimp.eu:3666",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
},
{
"name": "Mining Panda",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://miningpanda.site:3666",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
}
],
"api-port": "4028",
"failover-only": true
}
can someone help set a fail over for this ? . tried the folowing with no luck :
my bat : sgminer.exe --gpu-platform=2 --config failover.conf -w 64 -g 2 -X 256 --no-submit-stale
my conf :
{
"pools": [
{
"name": "Raven minepool",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://minepool.com:3636",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
},
{
"name": "Raven Yiimp",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://yiimp.eu:3666",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
},
{
"name": "Mining Panda",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://miningpanda.site:3666",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
}
],
"api-port": "4028",
"failover-only": true
}
Maybe try a password like "c=RVN"?
no still does not work any other idea?
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
We have started on the exchange side also:
https://twitter.com/ravencoinnews
Ravencoin (RVN) is now available live on six exchanges: Cryptobridge, CryptoHub, Exvo, Graviex, Nanex and QBTC. Exchange listings have just doubled in the month of April.
Legacytrx
https://twitter.com/ravencoinnews
Ravencoin (RVN) is now available live on six exchanges: Cryptobridge, CryptoHub, Exvo, Graviex, Nanex and QBTC. Exchange listings have just doubled in the month of April.
Legacytrx
WHAT IS THE POINT OF LISTING IN EXCHANGES THAT ARE VERY SMALL WITH NO VOLUME TO TRADE ?
ALL THE VOLUME GO TO CYRPTO BRIDGE .WHY NOT A MID ONE LIKE CYRPTOPIA?
ALSO CANT SEEM TO FIND EXCHANGE IN THE NAME OF EXVO ?
Re: [ANN] Avermore miner - optimized sgminer (AMD) fork for x16r/x16s/xevan(beta)
hi nice pepole
can someone help set a fail over for this ? . tried the folowing with no luck :
my bat : sgminer.exe --gpu-platform=2 --config failover.conf -w 64 -g 2 -X 256 --no-submit-stale
my conf :
{
"pools": [
{
"name": "Raven minepool",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://minepool.com:3636",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
},
{
"name": "Raven Yiimp",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://yiimp.eu:3666",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
},
{
"name": "Mining Panda",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://miningpanda.site:3666",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
}
],
"api-port": "4028",
"failover-only": true
}
can someone help set a fail over for this ? . tried the folowing with no luck :
my bat : sgminer.exe --gpu-platform=2 --config failover.conf -w 64 -g 2 -X 256 --no-submit-stale
my conf :
{
"pools": [
{
"name": "Raven minepool",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://minepool.com:3636",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
},
{
"name": "Raven Yiimp",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://yiimp.eu:3666",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
},
{
"name": "Mining Panda",
"nfactor": "10",
"algorithm": "x16r",
"quota": "1;stratum+tcp://miningpanda.site:3666",
"user": "RFBMCANQkBpd6KRiTFizuf59TCZNUv8GbC.VegaFrontier",
"pass":
}
],
"api-port": "4028",
"failover-only": true
}
Re: [ANN] Avermore miner - optimized sgminer (AMD) fork for x16r/x16s/xevan(beta)
Hey everyone,
I just made a new release: Avermore v1.2
Made some major improvements to the Hamsi kernel (+35%), with a 4% improvement in the overall average hashrate.
I'm now getting 7.8-8 MH/s average on my test rig's RX580 (up from 7.5 MH/s).
As always, feedback and reporting of issues is highly appreciated.
I just made a new release: Avermore v1.2
Made some major improvements to the Hamsi kernel (+35%), with a 4% improvement in the overall average hashrate.
I'm now getting 7.8-8 MH/s average on my test rig's RX580 (up from 7.5 MH/s).
As always, feedback and reporting of issues is highly appreciated.
Great thank you!
Good to see someone spending time on optimizing X16r for AMD.
Next please optimize AMD Vega
yes vega all the way / with vega frontair i get 13mh avg .now i wiil test 1.2 and see for improvment.
Re: [ANN] Avermore miner - optimized sgminer (AMD) fork for x16r/x16s/xevan(beta)
hi well i have a problem evrey few houres when the miner swich from my pool to dev pool the miner just get stuck and wont recontect to my pool allwayes saying trying to reconect but it wont so i need to close the miner and start it agian .can you please fix it .
beside that it does make 10% more
beside that it does make 10% more