If this is what I think it is, it is good news indeed. To put it in viral terms..... : -) ..... a viral infection makes its greatest leaps when it manages to escape a current, closed ecosystem - like crossing an ocean for example. If what this 'satellite node' announcement means is that you do not have to actually have the viral wallet to act as a viral node - then they have figured out a way to escape the crypto-ecosystem, as it were. It means the network can get much larger, much faster.

I am seeing alot of off the record buying ( by private messages) happening in the crowdfunding thread. What's up with that? What is the reason for keeping secret about buying this coin and how come so many people are doing that?

I'm now in the 2nd level of tech support of cryptsy for my deposit problem Unfortunatly I cannot double check again if I sent my coins to the correct stealth address, because its not displayed on blockexplorer or in my wallet transactionlist (xcashd). Is there another opportunity to see the stealth address again where its been sent?

It's not a bug, its about understanding the codebase in a way that makes sense.  The xCash codebase is organized like spaghetti code with a mishmash of different solutions that were coded for problems, ESPECIALLY in regards to the database.  There is 2 separate databases to track currency value when really there should be only 1. One uses BerklyDB the other LevelDB, 2 separate hash table database engines.  BerklyDB was the original, and LevelDB was supposed to better faster, but had problems on Mac with corruption etc...  So the programmers who did this initially half finished the conversion of the code for BerklyDB and left the other half LevelDB, leaving a huge mess to clean up.

So doing it the way I proposed will be less prone to errors and more secure long term.  Hope this clears some things up.

Note::

My solution is going to use an SQL table, which is slower if the ledger kept growing... HOWEVER... since I plan to have a limited ledger it will wind up being faster overall long-term and easier to maintain and understand.  Probably will use SQLite.

yes because my address is "normal", cryptsy has this long stealth addresses. At the moment I have problems receiving xcash to my cryptsy at all, for hours now. I hope its only a bug with them. You can save coins to my address anyway but I will send them out later, when cryptsy is ok again.

http://xcash.blockexplorer.cc/tx/64edf1b1daee579231c88c453ea7c64b489582c62d6553aec6ef0f3a2470655f#i0
 

Edit: hm I still dont see my last deposit on cryptsy. I hope you've got yours?

I apologize, I got held up with work to pay the bills , so its hard to get on here, but I'm still interested in this coin or the new version of it anyways.

There are a few things that are going to need to be made clear in regards to the current xCash holders.  Integrating the old coin value into the new coin I plan on attempting will be difficult if I attempt to do it directly.  By directly I mean, add into the code special conditions to look at the existing xCash online database and transfer etc...  Therefore, we'll have to come to some community assessment for how we plan to transfer xCash holders to the new coin.  I do have a few ideas for how it could be done.

Since the amount of major xCash holders is so small this should not be too difficult to do.

Possible Ideas

1.) We put the xCash funds into an address online that is public and visible for xCash holders currently.  I can then hardcode an equivalent amount of currency to preexisting addresses in the blockchain of the new coin I create.  As long as this is public knowledge which funds are going to what addresses and we are open about that here I think it will be okay for the coin just starting out.

Pros

• Very easy to transfer funds
• Proof you will receive funds within the blockchain of the new coin

Cons

• Requires trust that I will integrate into the new coin

This is the first idea I have so far, I'll put more as I think of them, but I want to do something to reward the current holders of xCash and transfer them over as best as possible.

2 questions for SN:

• Why not listed on Bittrex?

• Will you look into Navajo coin who just released what they claim to be the tightest anon protocol yet?

Trolls will be trolls.
Simply a waste of everyone's time.

Fuck off :-))) Read my last post on the TileCoin thread, I gave them a valid, very constructive and helpful comment on their hardware strategy and PCB, basically I brought more to their table in one post than the clueless, loud and useless Chinaman brigade combined :-)))