Search content
Sort by

Showing 6 of 6 results by trickshady
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ⚡[ANN] TOKENPAY ⚡ THE WORLD'S MOST SECURE COIN ⚡ TOKENSALE DECEMBER 7TH ⚡
by
trickshady
on 31/12/2017, 15:42:13 UTC
How do we transfer the coins to our wallet? I know of the issue that the current wallet cannot sync. Should we submit the address from the current wallet to the dashboard to get the tokens when they distribute them or wait for the new wallet to release? Right now my coins are on the site and I jhave not submitted any wallet address as I'm not liking how my wallet never syncs.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] {CredenceCoin} - CRDNC - Lending-Staking-Referrals-Mining
by
trickshady
on 06/12/2017, 02:12:28 UTC
Hi, what happened to the CRDNC coin, I see a large drop in prices on exchanges from $ 4 to 0.40 cents, which is probably due to the fact that the CRDNC network is not working well and developers are not following their project.

Dev 1 claims Dev 2 stole and dumped the premine , now its a question if dev 1 will give back the BTC he took in the ICO.





Thats classic, do we know  how many coins dev2 stole and how many have been sold  on Mercstox and coinex in the past 24h or so?





If dev one is honest then how about he gives us back btc or whatever is left unless dev 2 stole btc as well



i dont buy official story, easy way out, stealing/hacking ..cant prove or disprove anyting


This Dev is Honest and is totally shocked by what has happened and I would not be here to face the music if this were not the case.
And I am sure many of you are feeling shocked, angry, ripped off and dismayed along with a few other explicatives about what has happened, all I can say is that multiply it by 20 and I feel the same.  I was blind-sided by this and saw it coming as much as you did. There was no need for it to happen at all but how and when and the way it happened still has me personally in shock.  There has still been no communication so one can only assume the worst.  

My initial response was truthful when I said we are moving funds around as I had asked him to send me both some premine and BTC for the site going live, so when someone mentioned pre-mined movement I assumed that was what he was doing, then after the 2nd movement and the price tanking it became clear he was not shifting funds around he was dumping.   By the time he was finished it was too late that is why I tweeted do not buy any on exchanges.  

If he was hacked and said so then I could secure the remaining pre-mine and the personal and the coin could survive this but with 2.2M of coins out there potentially to be dumped at anytime then the coin can never recover as a lending platform in it's current state.  

Credence Coin was a great project, at completion and about to move to the next level and the business model was strong and sustainable and would have seen all investors profit.   The fact that this was done, not only to run off with a lot of the ICO money but by using the pre-mine it was done in a way that would see the coin itself destroyed really rubs salt into the wounds.  

He could have just waited 2 or 3 weeks and probably sold less of his personal and made the same if not more money but instead he decided to destroy the coin and run off and remove all contact.   Had he said he wants no further part in it and sold his personal over a 3 or 4-week period Credence still could have survived that but instead it was done how it was done.   As I said in a recent post, what he did he could have done in a slow and methodical way to dump his coins and make more money before taking off, but the fact that the premine was used and it was done in an obvious and aggressive manner shows he wanted to kill the coin, I still do not understand why and probably will never know.  

What makes it worse is people trusted Credence and the coin and its community would have seen it grow and grow and the Dev that has run off had he not done so probably would have been a multi-millionaire within weeks or months with Credence coin so again, I am dumbfounded as to why he would do this.  You think you know someone but this just proves you cannot trust anyone in crypto.  There is the still the slight chance he was hacked but even if that was the case I would have heard something from him by now and not been blocked.

I can only again offer sincere apologies to all affected, even though none of this was my doing and I did not see it coming I really am sorry for those who lost money.  

I know that talk is cheap but that is all I can do is apologize.  

So that leaves 2 options, I can either A.   Have a new coin made on a new blockchain and have the platform run with the new coin and do a swap for swap for current holders.  or B.  Refund every ICO investor a portion of their money, I will refund every single dollar that I have left from the ICO in a ratio to amount invested.   Unfortunately, I was also the one paying for all of the expenses for listings and the custom coding of the site and every other expense to do with the Coin and there is also the issue of those who dumped their ICO coins once the coins tripled in price on the markets. So some people will be paid for nothing but if their wallet balance is shows the coins were sold then no refund.  And the other dev had half of the funds so again it makes no sense why he would kill the coin when if he wanted to do a runner he could have just cut contact and walked away wealthy.  

Should option A be viable , I know that Crypto kong is part of one main group of investors and also is part of the Telegram which I am not.  If there was to be a new coin created I would do so under the proviso that the whole premine, website and coin is owned by that group of investors, not myself and I will send them the remainder of funds I have from the ICO for interest payments to holders.  I want nothing more to do with this other than to leave with my dignity and for all investors and supporters of Credence to know that at no time did I see this coming or plan for it to happen, you only get one shot at getting rich and that was mine and it is over, I accept that but it still leaves a bad taste in my mouth when I know what could have been.  

The platform is built and ready to go, and any coin can be attached to it, it is jut a matter of changing the coin and Daemon over.


So while I do not want to get into a lengthy discussion about how it will play out, because frankly I am ashamed to be even posting in this thread now.  I will contact Kong and see if his investment pals are interested and if it is to be the case then he can announce it to you guys.  Should they not be interested, I will post here one more time with details about how to obtain a partial refund for ICO investors.

Once again I am very sorry this happened and either way, I want you to know that I personally will not be left with $1 after this because I will either be refunding all of the remaining funds from my side or redistributing everything to a new project of which I will have no part of and have evidence of transfer if that is what will help the coin holders now more so than a partial refund to ICO investors.    



Hey Credence dev, if you really want us to believe you then the only way to prove yourself is to show us the complete website with backend ready and online. Allow for registrations so we can sign up and see that there really is a backend. If you fail to do this then don't even attempt to revive the project with another team and new coin. Nobody will ever trust you. LET US SEE THE GOD DAMN WEBSITE NOW!!!!!!!
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] {CredenceCoin} - CRDNC - Lending-Staking-Referrals-Mining
by
trickshady
on 05/12/2017, 17:38:04 UTC
What got me interested in Credence was their professional communication. Sadly that is the only professional thing we have seen from them so far. Also sadly professional communication is known to be the best way to manipulate and scam people. That's how people start believing in things they may not have in the past. Very good communication can be a double edge sword. It is the absolute lowest a human being can go if used for malicious purposes. Right now this is where this whole project is heading and it is so sad to see it go there as this was the lending platform I believed in the most!

Now lets assume Credence is not a scam and they will recover. The hit they took was massive. The entire reputation was destroyed and not having even a site up while this is going on makes it even worse. The damage has been done and too many people will leave and talk bad. Even if lending finally starts I just can't see how they will gain trust of people. This dumping will forever be associated with Credence and any new potential investor will just walk away without thinking.

Here is perhaps the biggest mistake they have done if they are not a scam. There is no fucking website up. I really just don't give a single fuck about how secure and perfect and flawless they want the site to be. What they need to understand is human psychology and what truly matters - delivery!!! They could have just had the website up without login/register option and continue working on testing it and taking it down when needed for tests. This way we at least know work has been done. They could have made a demo login so we can see how the backend looks like. This way the site is still under construction but at least we know it exists. If they are not a scam this is a disaster of a performance. Did they really not think how people will react to empty promises?

One thing I have learned in crypto is that if you don't deliver relatively soon to your promises, you are a scam even if you are not.

With that said, I still have some tiny hope for Credence. I really want them to succeed and hope it is not just another scam. If it is, then I have to seriously adjust the way I invest in crypto. No site = look away and never come back! A great forum thread with exceptional customer support and communication with the investors is just another empty promise. I hope I am wrong but I may need to start ignoring ALL communication from future projects and only rate them based on what they have done. Communication is only important if there are results. Then communication becomes even stronger with strong results!
Post
Topic
Board Tokens (Altcoins)
Re: 【ANN】⚡🚀 ETHEREUM LIMITED TOTAL COIN【ELTCOIN】 ⚡🚀
by
trickshady
on 28/11/2017, 18:41:22 UTC
When can we start staking and will there be a desktop wallet? As far as I know right now you can only store ELTCOIN on in iOS wallet or exchange. Well, I don't have any apple device.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] {CredenceCoin} - CRDNC - Lending-Staking-Referrals-Mining
by
trickshady
on 18/11/2017, 22:24:54 UTC
I have read that sometimes the QT wallet does not recognize your password even if it is written correctly, is this true? If you backup the wallet before you put a password and then again after you put one, can you later restore the non-password protected wallet if in the future QT stops accepting your correct password? I find this absolutely insane! Not even sure if it is 100% correct so please tell me if such a problem really exists with QT wallets. I still haven't put any CRDNC in my wallet as I wanna make sure I know exactly how to protect my coins if anything crazy happens.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] {CredenceCoin} - CRDNC - Lending-Staking-Referrals-Mining
by
trickshady
on 14/11/2017, 18:45:39 UTC
LOVE LOVE LOVE Credence coin. After reading the white paper and the posts, I can clearly see that the team has people that can communicate on a very professional level. No other lending platform comes even close to that. For some reason I have big trust in Credence, even bigger than Bitconnect. We may finally have a real rival. If Credence continues with the transparency and trust, there is no doubt in me that they will surpass the current king.

I tried to look for flaws and I found only one. I'm not sure how much of a flaw that is though.

Credence Coin uses ASIC mining. This can be no problem at all or a huge problem. ASIC mining tends to centralize cryptos because they are cost efficient (but still expensive for many people) and you can just buy a ton of them and have a big mining market share like we have with BTC and BCH. Some years in the future we may end up having a monopoly (or very close to it) rather than true decentralization on Credence. It all depends on how big it becomes and who has what % mining share. It is possible that Credence themselves may be mining it the most and having the potential power to move the market any way they want in the distant future. I am not fan of ASIC mining as it does not stimulate decentralization. GPU is much better for making any coin truly decentralized. I would really love some feedback on this from the Credence team.

After the recent BTC/BCH "war" it is very obvious that both are very centralized and a few people own most of them. They can just move money around and crash the market as they please. I personally do not have a problem with that since I have been trading for a few years now and know how the big dogs play. Every single market in the world has a few players that hold an incredible market share, including Forex, which is supposed to be decentralized, but that's far from the truth.

Last, I have a question about the staking. It says 20% per year which amounts to, I quote from white paper, "(0.054% Interest on Total Balance Per Day on average)". Does that mean we are paid daily and the 20% annual interest is compounded daily?