Thank you for upgrading to V8.
I saw prior to XMR fork you seemed resistant to prepare the patch with priority.
I knew you will and I'm glad you have changed your mind when you saw the consequences.
We have great confidence in you and we will create a better future together.

Obviously they don't want AVERAGE people to get involved in issuing new coins

GRAFT is on the bull run this weekend.
This is due to the recent announcement of RTA is being close to mainnet launch.
A perfect time to load up some GRAFT if you haven't done it already.

These guys are just here to bury real user comments

I have already complained about the way these guys fishing for personal information in order to re-instate your access to the token they have created.

UK Information Commissioner’s Office
https://www.gov.uk/data-protection/make-a-complaint

I find it unrealistic asking for my personal data so I maybe one day I will spend my coins with their instant payment system.
Also find it unrealistic to limit my access to funds so they get a better deal with their partners.

This is a serious problem, we're talking about 2 million people personal data

If you don't have an ID or you are not happy to provide your personal details for KYC (according to their privacy policy they will give your data out to 3rd parties) then you can complain about the service on the following link:

UK Information Commissioner’s Office
https://www.gov.uk/data-protection/make-a-complaint

According to EU data protection laws, they can't force you to provide personal details in order to send away your coins (they are not a bank)

It would be also good to ask officials to investigate how exactly these guys storing all the 2 million user's data, as their privacy policy doesn't explain this.

Their wallet service - users doesn't have access to their private keys.
This gives them absolute freedom over user funds.
When their total holdings fall short of total user balances - they just start blocking accounts.
Or just block the unbanked with no IDs sending their coins from the wallet service.

And this is just the surface. Imagine what they can be doing in the background.
If you follow John McAfee, he will explain you how global cartel powers taking over coins, exchanges, etc..

Probably this coin is part of the game too at the cost of ordinary people.

It is good for insiders and speculators, I'm not one of them.
I'm more likely supporting cryptos for their mission and not to get easy lambo.
Good luck to you, but careful. This looks to me a bit of a Chaincoin event 2.0 

My ETN account says:

We'll be back soon
We are currently migrating your wallet to the new instant payment system.
Please try again later.

What a joke. Suddenly 10x of the normal volume appeared for no reason whatsoever. Accounts randomly blocked with the message above so people can't sell their coins.
So the price only go upwards during the giant pump - nothing to counterbalance.

Not talking about the fact without KYC verification I won't be able to send my coins from my ETN wallet.
When I bought and mined my coins it was an anonymous crypto. Couple of months later I can't send my coins without providing personal details.

This is not a real cryptocurrency.
It's a centralised ponzi scheme.

1. They are working on the full implementation to make miners dumping meaningless... $12K dumping a day is no volume
2. It was indeed silly to promise you refunds for your incorrectly priced investment- but you have agreed the price on purchase

Well it should recover to ICO prices. If Verifone takes this thing on, this will be a blast-off

Excuse me... They have offered you 2bil max coin cap coin for $0.70 per coin on an ICO. And you have expected to make instant profit out of it...
Nobody forced you to buy, how can you call it a ripoff?

I'm mining GRAFT in the past 5 months and I don't feel screwed. All other coins having similar mining profitability on my rigs.
The price is low because there is no volume.
If you looking for speculator's pump and dump coin, washtrades then this is not the right coin for you.

You can mine any other algo/coin with your GPUs.
Would recommend you to choose the most profitable one.
As long as they keep the coin GPU friendly, therefore decentralised, we can't really blame the team for mining profits.

They are currently mass airdopping coins and working on the instant payment system that bitpay and coinbase already have for many years.

Ahh please, share us your knowledge, I haven't seen a single source / evidence / effort estimates / cost estimates / reward estimates  for a $3000 51% attack on a Cryptonote coin.

First of all the "51% attack" term is traditionally used for modifying past transactions, and in this case it was stated in a way so people will think somebody can steal their coins.
In this instance he could have said, somebody will be able to double spend their OWN coins to an exchange - but this doesn't as scary doesn't it?
How is a $3000 double spend attack will cause serious damage to the network and this is including Nicehash charges, infrastructure, your own coins you want to double spend and dev time spent on the attack?
Not talking about the fact that first they need to bypass Cryptonight double spend protection (requires a real expert) and it assumes the coin devs are not monitoring these activities whatsoever, and not countering the attempt.
Coins with very low hashrate requires much more confirmations on exchanges which also reduces the chances for an attack to succeed.
The website you linked states on the top says "This is a collection of coins and the theoretical cost of a 51% attack on each network".
This is already telling you, that it is theoretical, and not cost effective to the attacker at all.
So if you telling me you are able to perform a serious attack on a low hash Cryptonote coin at a $3k budget then you are a fool.

And BTW intense 51% attack was carried out by ASICS.
Source:
https://intensecoin.com/2018/04/imminent-hard-fork-and-network-attack/

PS.: And if you are not ready to discuss this and just want to discredit me, might aswell leave your keyboard untouched because your post is lack of evidence/fact backing the $3k attack bulls*** statement

And could you please explain me how someone would perform a 51% attack via NiceHash?
Tell you something better, GRAFT cryptonight coin is currently only 14MH/s total network speed - hack it with a total of $3k budget!
The funny about is the statement is all just fearmongering, only a kid high on candies would say something like this to scare his mates.
The fun is actually on YOU who believe this is possible.

Hello,

I have managed to setup a local debug version on Windows 7. Mining works fine. No errors.
Can anyone tell me if there is a way to inspect individual account dashboard (i.e.: unpaid balance, current hashrate, etc...)

Many thanks

The problem is that crypto rich core technical people have already pulled out long time ago. Why would they stick to the project when the technical lead makes such coconut statements:

“When we banned ASICs, Electroneum became vulnerable to attack”, he said. “From a rate of approximately 2 giga-hashes, we ended up with 30 mega-hashes just yesterday.  We calculated that if a malicious agent used a cloud-mining site like NiceHash, they could successfully stage a 51% attack for as little as $3,000”

51% attack via NiceHash for $3k 

So the admins told you to leave me negative trust for something I have never done, and blackmail me saying you will remove it if I remove the honest feedback? Doubt it.

Contraband just sent me a message trying to blackmail me saying:

"ETN is not a scam. You are abusing trust system. I will remove your negative trust as soon as you remove mine. This is silly"

That sounds like the real abuse of the system - giving a neg because you have received one. No question why ETN is going down. Their "community managers" are so unprofessional. Banning, blackmailing, discrediting customers.
ETN team, take a look at top companies social media feeds and learn how to handle complaints.