Search content
Sort by
Showing 5 of 5 results by tyutower
The monkey question might be a little silly. But the fact that evolution is a hoax is true, and not funny at all.
Things like:
1. probability math,
2. Irreversible Complexity,
3. no beneficial mutations ever having been found, not even once,
4. no proof of missing links in the fossils,
all show that evolution is simply a hoax, used to build scientists up in the eyes of the people, so that the scientists can make money off them, one way or another.
Things like:
1. probability math,
2. Irreversible Complexity,
3. no beneficial mutations ever having been found, not even once,
4. no proof of missing links in the fossils,
all show that evolution is simply a hoax, used to build scientists up in the eyes of the people, so that the scientists can make money off them, one way or another.
you're argumenting the lack of evidence that science can give about the origens of us humans. but there is not a single theorie out there that can give the needed evidence. and how are scientists trying to make money from us any different then the priests who always where whealthy and had losts of gold while the rest of the people could hardly make a living?
Re: 'Grote misvatting dat bitcoin uit handen van overheid kan blijven'
bitcoin-transacties zijn in tegenstelling tot wat eerder beweerd werd, TOTAAL NIET anoniem
sterker nog: er is nu een idee opgekomen, dat nog door de hele EU moet worden overgenomen, nieuwe regels dus
zie:
https://www.nu.nl/internet/5051699/eu-akkoord-met-strengere-regels-bitcoin-witwassen-voorkomen.html
nou, ze worden het niet eens met elkaar eens over bijvoorbeeld het vluchtelingen-probleem
tja, de banken willen weten waar het geld is, en waar het naar toe gaat
ik vraag me nu eigenlijk af, wanneer het in gaat, of dat het al is ingegaan of dat het juist over 18 maanden ingaat
graag zou ik willen weten, waar ik mijn licht op kan steken over deze regels
iemand?
sterker nog: er is nu een idee opgekomen, dat nog door de hele EU moet worden overgenomen, nieuwe regels dus
zie:
https://www.nu.nl/internet/5051699/eu-akkoord-met-strengere-regels-bitcoin-witwassen-voorkomen.html
nou, ze worden het niet eens met elkaar eens over bijvoorbeeld het vluchtelingen-probleem
tja, de banken willen weten waar het geld is, en waar het naar toe gaat
ik vraag me nu eigenlijk af, wanneer het in gaat, of dat het al is ingegaan of dat het juist over 18 maanden ingaat
graag zou ik willen weten, waar ik mijn licht op kan steken over deze regels
iemand?
ik weet precies waneer die regels ingaan. maar waarom is bitcoin niet anoniem zolang als je een vpn gerbruikt en de bitcoins niet omzet naar euro's of andere standaart valuta kan je wallet toch niet getraceerd worden naar een persoon?
wat denken jullie hier over?
graag jullie meningen
Re: 'Grote misvatting dat bitcoin uit handen van overheid kan blijven'
Volgens mij is btc al van een regering.
ik vraag me heel erg af op welke informatie je deze bewering berust. en over welke regering heb je het dan?
Would you agree and accept the help of robots in the society?
How about in the future a member of your family would be a robot?
We are coming to an age that the help of these machines/creations an advantage to us. What do you think?
How about in the future a member of your family would be a robot?
We are coming to an age that the help of these machines/creations an advantage to us. What do you think?
as many already said before i think that robots will contribute to a lot of help to the society. but for people to see robots as there 'family' there is need a lot more then just high affinity and being able to work hard. those robots as well as ampetie and shere our valjues. and i think the robots have a long way to go to get on such a level. If you are interested in this subject you can read one of his lectures.
Bitcoins very volatile prices have reignited the debate about its usefulness as a currency or as an asset. In some ways, Bitcoin suits the definition of currency quite adequately but if the volatility is less. It allows for the creation of secure and transparent transactions. Thus, can be used as a secondary currency in future. Some of the experts have huge concerns over its volatility. But, sooner or later the prices may remain less volatile as of today.
I have mentioned few points about Bitcoin as a currency or as an asset in my article here: https://atozforex.com/news/is-bitcoin-a-currency-or-asset/
What's your opinion about BTC as a currency or an asset?
Suggestions and comments appreciated
I have mentioned few points about Bitcoin as a currency or as an asset in my article here: https://atozforex.com/news/is-bitcoin-a-currency-or-asset/
What's your opinion about BTC as a currency or an asset?
Suggestions and comments appreciated
well that is a good question and also an important question.i believe bitcoin is invented whit the idea of an currency and for a long time it is used a such.however now that Bitcoin has risen so much in value and is being used by more and more people, bitcoin seems to be used more as an asset. for bitcoin to be used as a curenty there are not too much price fluctuations. the tought that buying something for one bitcoin today while tommorow it can cost just half a bitcoin wile problebly hold poeple from actually spending there bitcoins.