Search content
Sort by

Showing 6 of 6 results by uponroof
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] POPULOUS - Invoice trading platform | ICO l BOUNTY CAMPAIGN
by
uponroof
on 13/02/2018, 13:48:05 UTC
Nobody on this earth would continue such an obsessive relentless attack such as what these two FUDpackers are doing without a stealth agenda.  Nobody has that much time on their hands or the motivation to do it without a rea$on.  Nobody.

Exactly! Either we have in our midst stalwarts of community service, those who would sacrifice untold hours warning masses (who are unknown to them) of the grave injustice about to befall them....OR we have paid FUDSTERS who's only interest is to drive the price down as far as possible. ITS ONE OR THE OTHER! Such generous devotion of time towards complete strangers makes no sense.  
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] POPULOUS - Invoice trading platform | ICO l BOUNTY CAMPAIGN
by
uponroof
on 12/02/2018, 18:16:45 UTC
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] POPULOUS - Invoice trading platform | ICO l BOUNTY CAMPAIGN
by
uponroof
on 12/02/2018, 16:21:45 UTC
I didn't know the Luxure deal was off.
It was fake anyway.
Luxure deal is a hype created to pump the price.
Like I said before, Steve needs to live up to each hype that he created.
Creating that PXT token was an easy part.
Living up to the Luxure fake deal is a super challenging part, and thus was called off, or whatever.
The excuse was that Luxure will create its token.
But I suspect there will be no Luxure token whatsoever.
If anyone wants to blame the "failed" fake deal, Steve can put the "blame" on Luxure.
If Luxure wants to do its own ICO, it will create another set of ICO fakery, just like one of Adeyemi bros' doctailor.
The more fakery being put up, the more hypes need to be created, the more investors will be cheated, the more people will be coming after the criminal culprit.

You're trying too hard to create FUD and its obvious.
Take a minute to read this: https://medium.com/@BitPopulous/populous-legal-and-operational-review-feb-2018-586c85a4dfd6
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] POPULOUS - Invoice trading platform | ICO l BOUNTY CAMPAIGN
by
uponroof
on 12/02/2018, 14:16:18 UTC
What I think people are missing ok. Even if they get this thing of the ground. That’s the built of. Who is going to use it? The luxure deal is off. The whole setup is massively confusing with likens and ppt token and pxt tokens. Your local plumbing shop who needs to sell a few invoices to keep things going is going to look at all this and simply go to hard. To get this thing off the groundnd work  it’s going to take a intensive marketing plan where you sell it to businesses. People don’t believe in change and often are just happy to pay more to keep it simple.

This is valued like it is going to work and work well. Anyting less will tank it.


The value is in the invoice selling idea as much as the technical network being established. PPT isn't for the local plumber... its for Corporations, Institutions and eventually nation states. This is the carrot that holds so many despite the FUD. I see the concern and negativity of the Luxure deal as somewhat offset by Luxure's intention to create their own coin. So the Luxure FUD has a somewhat plausible explanation. Not totally vindicating but somewhat so. The fact that PPT is approx 1 year ahead of the competition allows forgiveness in schedule and set back FUD. His conviction is troubling but not a deal breaker. I say that because to attempt something so bold as to swindle millions in broad daylight, while presenting a product implies one of two things...1) a completely misunderstood changed man who has integrity if not the best business skills... or 2) a completely crazy devious person to think there's some sort of reward in being criminalized for the rest of his life. So the personal FUD is not so easily accepted. Now there is a number 3 here that no one is really addressing and that's whether or not he has the actual skill to create this extremely complex aggressive platform as suggested. Here is where my FUD resigns if anywhere... 'is he capable of creating this product'... not as much 'is he of honorable motives' So yes, I have some concerns but the suggestion that this is some sort of out in the open elaborate scam isn't one of them.

One more thing... I didn't see any over hyping or even PPT marketing regarding the Coinspot addition. Again, an argument for a lacking business savvy, not deceit. If the idea is good enough and the tech is sound the product will sell itself... and perhaps that's what's going on here.   
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] POPULOUS - Invoice trading platform | ICO l BOUNTY CAMPAIGN
by
uponroof
on 12/02/2018, 13:54:34 UTC
What I think people are missing ok. Even if they get this thing of the ground. That’s the built of. Who is going to use it? The luxure deal is off. The whole setup is massively confusing with likens and ppt token and pxt tokens. Your local plumbing shop who needs to sell a few invoices to keep things going is going to look at all this and simply go to hard. To get this thing off the groundnd work  it’s going to take a intensive marketing plan where you sell it to businesses. People don’t believe in change and often are just happy to pay more to keep it simple.

This is valued like it is going to work and work well. Anyting less will tank it.


The value is in the invoice selling idea as much as the technical network being established. PPT isn't for the local plumber... its for Corporations, Institutions and eventually nation states. This is the carrot that holds so many despite the FUD. I see the concern and negativity of the Luxure deal as somewhat offset by Luxure's intention to create their own coin. So the Luxure FUD has a somewhat plausible explanation. Not totally vindicating but somewhat so. The fact that PPT is approx 1 year ahead of the competition allows forgiveness in schedule and set back FUD. His conviction is troubling but not a deal breaker. I say that because to attempt something so bold as to swindle millions in broad daylight, while presenting a product implies one of two things...1) a completely misunderstood changed man who has integrity if not the best business skills... or 2) a completely crazy devious person to think there's some sort of reward in being criminalized for the rest of his life. So the personal FUD is not so easily accepted. Now there is a number 3 here that no one is really addressing and that's whether or not he has the actual skill to create this extremely complex aggressive platform as suggested. Here is where my FUD resigns if anywhere... 'is he capable of creating this product'... not as much 'is he of honorable motives' So yes, I have some concerns but the suggestion that this is some sort of out in the open elaborate scam isn't one of them.
Post
Topic
Re: [ANN] POPULOUS - Invoice trading platform | ICO l BOUNTY CAMPAIGN
by
uponroof
on 10/02/2018, 21:27:44 UTC

That's much hard situation to judge the real situation what is going on so that I'm hesitate to leave this train even I bought this token few months ago around $4 so that I would like to take risk on that and keep HODL that.

You bought for $4? Sell and go hodl ETN or something like that that has a much brighter future.
it is an option to sell now if you bought for 4 $ , but if you in here for quick profit you must already had sold them  , for now it is better to just hold and wait till all the bad fudd is gone

i still hold my populous from ico and no plans to sell them in the near future

This project caught my attention because of Clif High prediction about the great future of this platform it is first mover into that ecosystem. I have little amount of that token but just secured my initial investment and keep the rest amount for long term.



Clif had some interesting things to say about this PPT drama over the last 2 days... compares it to 'paid' fud when VERI BETA came out. Click on each tweet to see replies: https://twitter.com/clif_high