Inflation is a form of taxation. If you hold 1 cent (0.01$) you are already taxed.

Money serves to regulate consumption and, thus, comprises failings thereabout.

When bitcoins are loaned by their miners with interest to be paid in bitcoins, they will find their bottom—both ethically and monetarily.

The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens… Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.

Have you ever heard the saying 'never put all your eggs in one basket'
Probably somehing like that, i don't know.

The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens… Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.

The state and corporate spheres can merge (again, Mussolini's definition of Fascism) and promulgate a variety of political, social, and economic landscapes.  Various elements typically considered Socialism is certainly one possibility here.

What probably won't last very long under Mussolini's conception of Fascism is Democracy.  More and more that is slipping away here in the U.S. where we have the choice between two awful and barely distinguishable candidates for important offices (esp, the presidency) and a lot of significant on-the-ground actions are the result of unelected and uncountable boards and executive policy is formed and implemented with no transparency and blatant subterfuge (see the recent Gruber stuff as an example.)

The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens… Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.

. . .

If existence comprised an absolute quantity of microstates, then its mezostates would too. If “position” was an element of these microstates, “momentum”—as a conglomeration of such positions (and correspondent masses)—would be an element of their mezostates. In that case, ascertaining position would require forsaking momentum and vice versa.

. . .

“Reality” could also be termed the collection of solitary (static) microstates of existence that align to form the emergent properties thereof most generally termed “change.”

     Anarchism, the no-government system of socialism, has a double origin. It is an outgrowth of the two great movements of thought in the economic and the political fields which characterize the nineteenth century, and especially its second part. In common with all socialists, the anarchists hold that the private ownership of land, capital, and machinery has had its time; that it is condemned to disappear; and that all requisites for production must, and will, become the common property of society, and be managed in common by the producers of wealth. And in common with the most advanced representatives of political radicalism, they maintain that the ideal of the political organization of society is a condition of things where the functions of government are reduced to a minimum, and the individual recovers his full liberty of initiative and action for satisfying, by means of free groups and federations--freely constituted--all the infinitely varied needs of the human being.

     As regards socialism, most of the anarchists arrive at its ultimate conclusion, that is, at a complete negation of the wage-system and at communism. And with reference to political organization, by giving a further development to the above-mentioned part of the radical program, they arrive at the conclusion that the ultimate aim of society is the reduction of the functions of government to nil--that is, to a society without government, to anarchy. The anarchists maintain, moreover, that such being the ideal of social and political organization, they must not remit it to future centuries. but that only those changes in our social organization which are in accordance with the above double ideal, and constitute an approach to it, will have a chance of life and be beneficial for the commonwealth.

. . .

The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens… Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.

I mean especially if someone has an idea how this can be done in detail.

I doubt anarchism is a way for the future. People are probably thousands of years away of being able to life that way. Even nowadays anarchists use things produced by others though mostly dont produce much of worth from their side. If everyone would life like those anarchists try to life then it would not work definitely.

The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens… Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.

I like very much both titles what is that? What's the aim? The Imperial bureau of rumination . Do you guarantee a safe experience for those venturing in your hive?

Imperial Bureau of Rumination (IBR) reinforces imperial thought, ruminating a variety of matters including ownership, money, government, and other major topics.

     Anarchism, the no-government system of socialism, has a double origin. It is an outgrowth of the two great movements of thought in the economic and the political fields which characterize the nineteenth century, and especially its second part. In common with all socialists, the anarchists hold that the private ownership of land, capital, and machinery has had its time; that it is condemned to disappear; and that all requisites for production must, and will, become the common property of society, and be managed in common by the producers of wealth. And in common with the most advanced representatives of political radicalism, they maintain that the ideal of the political organization of society is a condition of things where the functions of government are reduced to a minimum, and the individual recovers his full liberty of initiative and action for satisfying, by means of free groups and federations--freely constituted--all the infinitely varied needs of the human being.

     As regards socialism, most of the anarchists arrive at its ultimate conclusion, that is, at a complete negation of the wage-system and at communism. And with reference to political organization, by giving a further development to the above-mentioned part of the radical program, they arrive at the conclusion that the ultimate aim of society is the reduction of the functions of government to nil--that is, to a society without government, to anarchy. The anarchists maintain, moreover, that such being the ideal of social and political organization, they must not remit it to future centuries. but that only those changes in our social organization which are in accordance with the above double ideal, and constitute an approach to it, will have a chance of life and be beneficial for the commonwealth.

. . .

The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens… Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.

uh, what makes you think aliens are real? lol.

Planets exist there, and we do not have the ability to observe planets of our size; therefore, it is entirely possible that the civilizations described above do, indeed, occupy planets akin to our own both in size and and orbital zone. As well, considering the close proximity of some of these stars (“α Centauri” is our nearest solar neighbor), it is entirely reasonable to expect them to have found or heard of us in exploring their most immediate, solar surroundings (upon, of course, acquiring the ability and desire to do so).



However, it should not come as any surprise that the people, Homo sapiens, that exterminated Homo erectus and the Neanderthals would instill certain reservations within prospective visitors and motivate them to maintain a general ignorance as to their existence among that people.

(Google translate)

"....Experiment Cern: The resurrection of the ether as a fifth element.

The notorious "unknown" link of matter, the Higgs boson is the springboard for the much-known international work as an experiment in CERN. Once again in modern times, truths spoken thousands of years ago, returning to great discoveries. Thus, while the descriptions of the solar system was given and extinct for centuries, as epanerchonto achievements materialistic culture. What if the hapless Copernicus made explicit references to the work of Aristarchus, modern leaders, insist the show as a groundbreaking researcher. What if Plato and Pythagoras had analyzed the morphology and sphericity of the Earth and the solar system, modern scientists until the 70s believed that the planets is 7, while still searching the Tenth (Antichthon).

So far, the experiment of Cern, attempt to restore with scientific proof of the existence of ether as a fifth element, the binder material. While well aware that the Ether element as was accepted by Descartes, Copernicus, Newton, Tesla, Faraday and many others. The assumption of the existence owe electricity, magnetism and many other applications that we enjoy today. Even nuclear energy.

THE GROUNDS OF ETHER APOKRYPSIS

While it may seem excessive, the existence of Ether hushed because nullify Religious and materialistic beliefs. The presence of the ether as a fifth element, giving 'divine' status in the very nature explaining many of the secrets of creation. So shoot down the monopoly of Messianistic religions based their authority to represent the supreme supernatural power.

The Materialism, concealed the power of Ether reasons for interest. The management of Ether can offer a large sum of cheap energy, canceling the power structure of monopoly power as leverage.

The coup de grace scientific burial ether was the theory of relativity, the theory has already been refuted experimentally! Einstein even practically handed the management of the ether as the final ingredient to create the Atomic Bomb. Creation which is still the ultimate instrument of power....."

"...Theorists of New Physics believe that Ether doesnt obeys the notorious Law of Thermodynamics, which argue that energy can not be created nor destroyed, only to change his form. For these energy always existed and always will exist. There is no need to be created or destroyed. What is needed is a new Einstein will overcome the laws of conservation of energy and create a theoretical framework on which to build the new etheric technology (Aether Technology). The problem is that people refuse to believe that they have unlimited possibilities in front of them, enough to properly exploit the intelligence and instincts. Our planet is suffocating under the current energy model, based on the combustion of carbon compounds. The Earth can not wait any longer. Revolutionaries need not tomorrow, but today. Not only words, but also action. "The triumph of evil is for good to do nothing» (Edmund Burke)..."

. . .

If existence comprised an absolute quantity of microstates, then its mezostates would too. If “position” was an element of these microstates, “momentum”—as a conglomeration of such positions (and correspondent masses)—would be an element of their mezostates. In that case, ascertaining position would require forsaking momentum and vice versa.

. . .

“Reality” could also be termed the collection of solitary (static) microstates of existence that align to form the emergent properties thereof most generally termed “change.”

     Anarchism, the no-government system of socialism, has a double origin. It is an outgrowth of the two great movements of thought in the economic and the political fields which characterize the nineteenth century, and especially its second part. In common with all socialists, the anarchists hold that the private ownership of land, capital, and machinery has had its time; that it is condemned to disappear; and that all requisites for production must, and will, become the common property of society, and be managed in common by the producers of wealth. And in common with the most advanced representatives of political radicalism, they maintain that the ideal of the political organization of society is a condition of things where the functions of government are reduced to a minimum, and the individual recovers his full liberty of initiative and action for satisfying, by means of free groups and federations--freely constituted--all the infinitely varied needs of the human being.

     As regards socialism, most of the anarchists arrive at its ultimate conclusion, that is, at a complete negation of the wage-system and at communism. And with reference to political organization, by giving a further development to the above-mentioned part of the radical program, they arrive at the conclusion that the ultimate aim of society is the reduction of the functions of government to nil--that is, to a society without government, to anarchy. The anarchists maintain, moreover, that such being the ideal of social and political organization, they must not remit it to future centuries. but that only those changes in our social organization which are in accordance with the above double ideal, and constitute an approach to it, will have a chance of life and be beneficial for the commonwealth.

. . .

The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens… Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.

     Anarchism, the no-government system of socialism, has a double origin. It is an outgrowth of the two great movements of thought in the economic and the political fields which characterize the nineteenth century, and especially its second part. In common with all socialists, the anarchists hold that the private ownership of land, capital, and machinery has had its time; that it is condemned to disappear; and that all requisites for production must, and will, become the common property of society, and be managed in common by the producers of wealth. And in common with the most advanced representatives of political radicalism, they maintain that the ideal of the political organization of society is a condition of things where the functions of government are reduced to a minimum, and the individual recovers his full liberty of initiative and action for satisfying, by means of free groups and federations--freely constituted--all the infinitely varied needs of the human being.

     As regards socialism, most of the anarchists arrive at its ultimate conclusion, that is, at a complete negation of the wage-system and at communism. And with reference to political organization, by giving a further development to the above-mentioned part of the radical program, they arrive at the conclusion that the ultimate aim of society is the reduction of the functions of government to nil--that is, to a society without government, to anarchy. The anarchists maintain, moreover, that such being the ideal of social and political organization, they must not remit it to future centuries. but that only those changes in our social organization which are in accordance with the above double ideal, and constitute an approach to it, will have a chance of life and be beneficial for the commonwealth.

. . .

Kimosabe, get a clue of how the world really works.

The internet (i.e. the free market which is why you have it today) is the only free press remaining in the USA.

You are an young idealistic liberal idiot with a functioning vocabulary and extremely discombobulated illogic (you put the cart before the horse w.r.t. internet and free media) because your political religion does not allow you to understand the logic of the asymmetric power of political capture and why collectives always fail in a heap of vested interests corruption. The ONLY way to avoid that is do not form collectives and enable the free market to prosper.

Hey what happened to your threat to put me on ignore?  

     Anarchism, the no-government system of socialism, has a double origin. It is an outgrowth of the two great movements of thought in the economic and the political fields which characterize the nineteenth century, and especially its second part. In common with all socialists, the anarchists hold that the private ownership of land, capital, and machinery has had its time; that it is condemned to disappear; and that all requisites for production must, and will, become the common property of society, and be managed in common by the producers of wealth. And in common with the most advanced representatives of political radicalism, they maintain that the ideal of the political organization of society is a condition of things where the functions of government are reduced to a minimum, and the individual recovers his full liberty of initiative and action for satisfying, by means of free groups and federations--freely constituted--all the infinitely varied needs of the human being.

     As regards socialism, most of the anarchists arrive at its ultimate conclusion, that is, at a complete negation of the wage-system and at communism. And with reference to political organization, by giving a further development to the above-mentioned part of the radical program, they arrive at the conclusion that the ultimate aim of society is the reduction of the functions of government to nil--that is, to a society without government, to anarchy. The anarchists maintain, moreover, that such being the ideal of social and political organization, they must not remit it to future centuries. but that only those changes in our social organization which are in accordance with the above double ideal, and constitute an approach to it, will have a chance of life and be beneficial for the commonwealth.

. . .

OBAMA-NET!!!

The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens… Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.

You write as if plutocracy were republican democracy.

The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens… Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.

I can't understand how a bunch people who can tell and force everyone else how they should behave, sleep and drink be compatible with a bunch of people not wanting any master and live as they see fit while not wanting to arm anyone else? I am guessing I am not smart enough to understand this great concept and need to read tons and tons of books...


Right, so we have the internet and it is not perfect. Still that framework was good enough to create facebook, google, netflix, but also ANONYMOUS and Bitcoin and TOR, etc, etc.

How changing this framework back to laws thought and created in the 1930's make this amazing technology better for the 21th century and beyond? The internet will be a utility only in the USA, but not in South Korea or Guatemala or Canada?

. . .

The truth is that the State is a conspiracy designed not only to exploit, but above all to corrupt its citizens… Henceforth, I shall never serve any government anywhere.

user[name]18444, we no longer live in a resource scarcity paradigm (its only the peaking socialism, misallocation of resources with $227 trillion global debt that gives the illusion of resource scarcity) rather now in a knowledge paradigm. Wealth of knowledge is not uniformly distributed.

user[name]18444, we no longer live in a resource scarcity paradigm (its only the peaking socialism, misallocation of resources with $227 trillion global debt that gives the illusion of resource scarcity) rather now in a knowledge paradigm. Wealth of knowledge is not uniformly distributed.

For these, then, your “golden rule” is my “tyranny,” and your “libertarian” is my “despot.”

You delete your bumps and repost them every 10-20 minutes, and have been for some time now.

Ban evasion isn't going to help you.