should we select/tick on box cost of btc (0.0001BTC ) to the winning 0.1025BTC jackpot? my experience playing in freebitco.in, we must select cost to join the jackpot.

If forgoton password, how to recovery?, I was joined a month ago, seems i can't login cause that. when i try to sign up again I got "Error
Something is wrong. Please try again".

Look like Vision claim as real Bitcoin.

Thanks for everyone’s high attention to our beloved Crash.
After careful checking, we found the client seed belongs to roulette. As we all know, it is not a good idea to use Roulette's seed to verify the result of Crash.
We’re not sure if it’s some misunderstanding caused by design of the game, but if it is, we will adjust according to community voice.
For Crash, we will keep soliciting suggestions from the community and optimize the game, such as to add the hash of the corresponding hash of tron block as salt in each round, or to take a more general approach: add the hash of Bitcoin's future blocks as salt.
We hope you could experience our games first before you make a comment. (Our poor little dev told me the unfortunate fact that you never bet once and used email and IP from Mars )
In short, BC.Game belongs to the entire community.We welcome questioning, but we don't accept  groundless attacks and smears.
We stick to provably fair and present our players the best we can.
Again, thanks for all the love and support.
BC.Game

You're just as likely of getting scammed if you use certain escrows.  Research the escrow names by t=googling them with site:bitcointalk.org in the searchterm. 

Minerjones is your best bet. I'm working with MJ to build an automated escrow system so current escrows can't decide to keep the funds if something odd happens. 

You could assign each user with their own address index and only assign it when user want to see the bitcoin address for deposit to reduce workload of the wallet software.



Yes, it's possible.

The website's quite good! The design is pleasant, the website's user-friendly, and registration is simpler than usual. The overall experience reminds of Primedice. What is missing is an autobet mode, but I think it was probably the choice not to include that. I claimed the faucet money and tried playing. It's good that even though the faucet says that the balance has to be empty if you end up with an amount smaller than a minimum bet but not zero, you can claim the faucet again. Although I guess it means that the error description should be adjusted and that something like 'The balance should be less than a minimum bet amount to claim the faucet'.

Here comes my review:

---

I like the website's design. There are a few things it's missing (such as the information in the top-left corner: Online users, BTC Price and Total Jackpot, although I guess they're going to be added as soon as the testing phase ends). One particular thing is the fact that I cannot see my balance without having to press the "hamburger" icon in the top-right corner (keep in mind that I used a Tor browser without resizing it!).

However, the website's faucet function was very easily abused by me:

I first logged in through Tails, which allowed me to easily get into the website and claim a faucet without any kind of verification. This lit up a bulb in my head - it's easy to abuse the sign-up & faucet. Therefore, I moved to a Live Parrot OS and installed Atbswp (macro recorder). I turned on Anonsurf, launched an anonymous Firefox session and the Tor Browser. I went to your website on both browsers and I had two accounts in an instant. Here's a full list of the accounts I was able to generate throughout my test (doesn't include the accounts created on Tails):


Well, here comes the good news (for me): I recorded my mouse using Atbswp and I was able to successfully playback the movements to create a bot that automatically claims a faucet for me and plays it for a 0.09% chance (which, in case of a win, would exceed minimum withdrawal amount)!

Keep in mind that I am NOT a hacker/programmer so this was just an idea that popped up in my mind. Someone with bad intents could've used a script or something to do the same thing without getting caught.

My mission was the following: Create two accounts, claim faucets unlimited times and play until I get a win.

After a few dozen attempts, I found out that the website allows only 25 faucet claims per day per account. Well.. time to go further with the tests! I changed my ID through Anonsurf, entered a new identity through Tor Browser and there we go! Two more accounts, 50 more free attempts!

Anyways, my mouse macro idea wasn't the best as it always somehow clicked next to the website buttons instead of directly on them which took me some time to fix (wish I knew how to create scripts), but the perfect attempt was going with the last two accounts. I was willing to go even further with the testing but unfortunately, you closed the website while I was undergoing tests on accounts e0qrV5fuet and FxnGqlJVod so the fun stopped there.

Therefore, based on the tests I ran, I would advise you to place verification for all users upon login and upon faucet claiming (there are some Google Captcha bypassing software you can use to bypass these too) and maybe add a 5 minute timer between faucet claims in order to avoid abuse.

---

EDIT: Looks like my review came after the testing phase has ended (and apparently, the testing phase ended while I was conducting my tests). I left you a PM right after my reply from page two (reply will be quoted below), hopefully I still qualify

---

Second edit: I'll leave some other suggestions here and proof that I've tested the site before the testing phase ended:

Here I have an image of the frontpage where I think the wallet balance should be shown (quite annoying to check it from the menu every time):



I also think the menu options should be arranged differently, design doesn't look very good:



And here's a list of the bets from one of the first accounts I made throughout my test:

I was able to play last hour but now suddenly i am getting this error . Is everything OK at your site ?

I am interested to try out the site, kindly check the telegram chat btw

Few things that I can point out :

1. There should be a FAQ page to let people know few things that arent clear on the site such as the "tier" stuff in affiliate program

2. The self reporting system in megapot should be bolded or even written with different colour to emphasize that people need to self report it or else they might miss it out

3. There should be leaderboard up to 15th places if there is 15 prizes to grab for the daily wager race

4. Should have better security for player's account. The site doesnt force newcomer to create an account ( put in password for the account ), which means that alot of new account have no password at all. If by any chance, a player suddenly clear cache of the browser then the account would be lost

5. Im not sure if there wont be any autobet in the future as well but if there will be no autobet then perhaps you could add some hotkey option. Instead of clicking roll numerous time, people could just spam the roll button with their keyboard

---

Things that I find quite unpleasant ( my own personal preference though )

1. The chat message should be automatically sent whenever someone hit enter on their keyboard instead of clicking the send button

---

Could be a bug, or it is intended

Whenever you spam the roll button and you win the bet, sometimes the sound stuck or there is no sound at all. However it is the other way around if you lose the bet, the sound is showing up every single time you lose even if you spam the roll

Why does your site looks like Stake's?

---

- When trying to signup it says "Too many signups, please wait a while". Can't your servers handle too many requests?
- Unlike the "all bets" tab, "my bets" is not updating in real time, you have to refresh the page each time.
- Long pop-up modals (like the Megarace one) don't have a scroll bar in them, even though they are scrollable using the mousewheel.