Invest a small amount in rox maybe something like 0.05 or something if your unsure  

Yeah I guess suchpool is on it, I have my 15mh/s pointed there.  

Hello

Our dev has applied the changes to the network and we are waiting for Bittrex to reactivate the market. You have invested 5 btc at a higher price? That is a lot of money. I will make sure you don't lost a damn penny and this is my personal commitment to you.

This has been a PR disaster and a total fuckery with our own resources/ our own time - your money, and your time.

We are thinking of holding a Skype session with investors to clear the air, we are ready to talk to you with our own voice and hear out your concerns.

Dyffy is a legitimate start-up with an extremely talented/skilled development crew. I put my real life credibility on the line and requested them kindly to collaborate with us. After the first initial wave of FUD they were extremely discouraged to work with us and I pleaded with them to continue. They were planning to integrate ROX with soundcloud API in a very unique way however they could not damage their own credibility by associating with ROX after that entire FUD storm.

I had already planned to tell the Dyffy team to separate as I could not bear the thought of the embarrassment that I would face if those in this community engaged in an assault against them as well.

Lets arrange a skype session, get on and talk this out. Our dev is in another timezone and comes online from around 6 PM PST on wards. As soon as Bittrex enables the market and he comes online he will be implementing new technical changes.

I am not endorsed with CAM, I have never heard of it until people started speaking about it last night. I do not care about it, I will bring ROX back up no matter what.

hi victzhang,

thanks a lot for your great comments. as i am not the technical type of person, so I am not very sure about the very reason how we are attacted. I'll consult our enginner to get more information about the problem we were in.

i also hope mintpal will add boostcoin. a coin with more liqudity is good for all. not only the supporters of the coin, not only the exchanges, but also the coin it own.

have a nice day.


sammy

LOL. It is not possible to get a 51% attack on boostcoin, as that means 1 person owns 51% of all staking coins, which has NOT happened.

i hope mammix2 gives up on your exchange as you seem to be very incompetent.

What is needed is an algo which will assess a penalty (a drain) against any wallets holding excessively large stakes in the coin. This algo would constantly evaluate and be aware of wealth distribution on the whole network based upon activity recorded in the block chain (pseudo-anonymously).  When the size or advantage of a wallet, or a quorum of wallets, or a "neighborhood" of wallets, reaches a certain threshold or relational structure, then the algo will trigger the "fission" of the coin balance (a small fraction of it) to occur in the designated penalty wallet(s), while the network makes corresponding microdeposits in another designated set of wallets, the beneficiary wallets.

A Fission event may (A) create new coin and/or (B) deduct existing coin.  A Fission event occurs, for example, when one or more stakes becomes "too big," or an oligarchy of stakes becomes too entrenched.  Fission causes the dispersal of coin from the big stake(s) into and among wallets deemed worthy of being beneficiaries.  That opens a wide door, doesn't it?

Fission may accomplish wealth redistribution, or not.  Its up to the devs and the market to decide which fission regimes are the best.  

My preference is to have fission deduct from top stakes and drizzle the harvest into every other wallet on the network in statistically-defined patterns and portions.  

This "fallout" or dust caused by fission can be distributed randomly in all wallets or apportioned methodically into the appropriate beneficiary wallets.  Different coin developers can compete with different coins defining different ways to determine which "standards" and wallets are "appropriate."  It would open up a whole new generation of PoS coins.  

To sum up: In the proposed "fission" mechanism, whenever the algo determines that a critical mass exists in one or more wallets, or that the time has come to forceably reshape the wealth distribution profile of the network, the stakes in the one or more wallets undergo "coin fission," and each stake blasts a calculated sum of coin out into the community to be received however the devs have arranged it. The dynamics of any coin's fission rules can be customized and finely tuned.

And importantly, stakeholders can reasonably predict the consequences of holding a fissile coin, because the terms and criteria are published; however, stakeholders can never predict the precise timing and exact cost of any one fission event (so they cant avoid it). Thus they must acquiesce to the "stake tax" when investing in the coin or they must go find another coin to parasitize.  Still, in a fissile coin, the largest stakeholders do gain enough steady growth overall to compensate and reward them for remaining dominantly invested in the coin.  

My vision of Fission is that it tickles the big wallets more than it mauls them.

Thus, the above concept is a suggestion for implementing a "coin fiission" algo that might save us from the current doldrums of the "gotto go PoS" days of altcoins, where the imperfect infrastructure of the digital economy is selecting strongly for PoS algos even though we may be better off without much PoS.  

The proposed Fission algo will operate upon wallet balances that reach a "critical mass," or throughout a network when it starts dying for lack of liquidity due to excessively large stakeholdings (e.g., high coin age).  Fission imposes a size-dependent cost upon the largest and laziest stakeholders and it makes offsetting deposits in other wallets according to variable rules and goals.  This will promote liquidity in PoS and will smooth out the rough edges of wealth-concentration patterns that would otherwise characterize a mature PoS network.  


Got it?  Great.  Have a beta version in my inbox by tomorrow...

Your comments and criticisms are most welcome...

ha ha..

quark is just fine. Stop making all coins the same. Quark has been copied many times - because it is good. Please no pos. Pos is more inflation and reduces the value in the long run. don't kill quark with pos. Thanks.
Have some patients with it and improove otherwise. do not dilute scarce coin.

that was painful to try to read, and I still have no idea what the OP is talking about...  He seems to not know quite what he is talking about either.

+1

DRK, XLB, XC, DRM, CTZ, QBC, GDN, MAST, DIS, HIRO, JUG, AV, MUN, LGC, BDG, WEST, BANK, ERC, GRN ARE ALL SPAMCOINS BEWARE OF WHOM YOU TRADE WITH SHITTY PREMINED COINS!!!

Cryptsy got bribed:  i talked to cryptsy owners, i said like did XLB owners pay for the introduction too cryptsy?. and they were like they did not bribe us, and then they did shut theyr mouths, who was talking about bribe in the second hand? not me, they talked about it

says it all

I also believe this is the same guy behind the DRK scam, as he probably owns DRK.biz too And DRK is the closest i could get an scammer as Darkhack guy.
He probably had enough money to start up this coin Darkcoin, and paid some others too do it big time with money.

I believe this is something closer than ever.

I was on www.darkhack.com and checked the site, and was robbed 0.75 BTC out of him, probalby im on the trace to take him even bigger with darkcoin coins.

Darkhack has been taken down lately.

2 millions USD scammer

First name: Amr
Last name: Elsayed
billing address: 44 Alfalouga Street
City: Gizah
State: Al Jizah
zip code: 00202
Country: Egypt
Phone number: +201004611480
Amr.elsayed@runbox.com
https://www.facebook.com/amr.elsayed.731572

He is owner on darkhack.com
He scammed 400 peoples for 2 million USD.

He is a ripper!! He is from egypt, never trust anyone on darkhack.com, that just fakes accounts, full of rippers, full of fake shop, managed by HABBA and his little army of poor soldiers.

 

And the same people will chase and praise it when it become hot again.

Kolin, I'm actually a supporter of Quark. But right now we are quite a weak and anyone could easily destroy Quark both with market manipulations and 51% mining attack and it will be cheap for them. Let's admit it and work this out. On the other hand Quark is the only coin I know made with use of market and macroeconomic theory and human experience in this field of knowledge. Quark is a quality work on the mistakes which appeared in bitcoin protocol and economics in recent 5 years. Since that, Quark has the best fundaentals among cryptocurrencies to day. Moreover, developers and community know that the way to success don't lay through painting doggies on cars but through real work like seeking pertnership with game developers. Only a few people in whole crypto world understand it (Charlie Shrem, Tony Gallippi to name a few).
What we see now is a wild market, when a really large money belong to those who just was in the right place in the right time. From time to time it happens in the real world, the great example is a 90s market reforms in Eastern Europe or Latin America. Huge fortunes fell into hands of yesterdays ordinary engineers and workers and many of them don't know what to do with them. Look at the hundreds of jackpot winners who lost everything in months and returned to their few-dollar-work. Money leave the hands of those who dont deserve them. We can see it in cryptos and Quark right now. People with millions of Quarks just see a decline in price and Doge or Dark hype and pump and decide to quit the market. They just don't understand what fell in their hands and don't know how to grow their fortune. Yeah better to join some hype sit and wait when someone took you to the moon where you will be R.I.C.H. For a pity on their way they are able to do much harm to efforts of those who actually trying to do something usefull.
Microeconomic theory proves that free-market equilibrium is Pareto-optimal (1st Welfare Theorem) but don't say when the equilibrium is reached. I believe that no faster than inflation hits 1-2% range what happens for bitcoin and similar coins in 10 years since the first block. Quark could do it much faster maybe in a year or two, when big wallets either lost their coins or prove they deserve them. All the mining issues will be solved in prices 20-50 times more than present which I consider not only possible but inevitable.

To sum up, Quark is not for those who seek a coin which allow looting itself by mining and ineffective distribution model, and not for those who scour a quick buck in a matter of weeks. These kind of people will try to crap it, cause they just don't see a sence in its existence. Quark is for those who are willing and able to work and understand how to move the community forward or at least trying to become such. For these folks Quark is the best platform for now.
That's what me, Kolin and others are trying to say, despite some controversions on a few technical issues. 

Updated Windows Qt wallet available - v0.8.3.23.

* Latest checkpoints
* Minor bug fixes
* Single .exe (statically linked libraries)

https://mega.co.nz/#!x9MhAZgB!YI34YN4DAwUq3Opj27xFiXcdL-SpXvIigPMdvVrU07o
https://www.dropbox.com/s/y2suklup05eo5ut/quarkcoin083r23win.zip

File hash: MD5 4127E71A099B0284D5437262092322E3