Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 4,753 results by viljy
Post
Topic
Board Токены
Re: [***] Создаём экосистему мем-токена Chamby
by
viljy
on 25/07/2025, 16:39:43 UTC
Под именем SHAMBY... https://www.kuru.io/trade/0xfef445a33042c0dd114329ba4c4c699df7f345b2

Делаем активность на kuru в тестовой сети monad и заодно шамбим чамби. У меня кончилились тестовые mon, а то сам бы чамбил шамби дальше. Сеть вроде запускают в сентябре тогда же и токены дропнут и сети и декса.
Чамбование будет по возможности распространяться повсюду под разными именами (Шамби, Цамби, Хамби  и т.п.), но всегда с каким-то узнаваемым элементом, связанным с аутентичном Чамби.
Post
Topic
Board Токены
Re: [***] Создаём экосистему мем-токена Chamby
by
viljy
on 25/07/2025, 09:13:18 UTC
k - const, - это константа. Это означает, что если в пул не вносили изменений, то есть никто не добавлял ликвидность в пул или не изымал ее из пула, то - это число k не должно изменяться! То есть покупки и продажи не влияют на эту константу,

Внесение и изъятие ликвидности тоже не влияет на к. Чтобы поменять к, надо старый пул торговой пары полностью удалить (что не на всех дексах возможно), и пересобрать новый пул с другим к (то есть по другому курсу). Однако тоже самое можно сделать просто торговыми сделками в старом пуле. Пересборки ЛП делают в исключительных случаях. Например, это последний метод вернуть привязку к доллару у алгоритмического стейблкоина. Например, у Fei USD такой метод даже был указан в вайтпейпере как "последний рубеж" (Это алгостейбл был с очень сложным заумным стартом, который был неудачным, а алгоритм привязки держится на жестоких штрафах и маленьких поблажках), впрочем все алгостейблы для крипторынка это как в телеге пятое колесо.
Погоди... Как же не влияет?
Если в пуле было, как в примере, 2 одного и 2 другого. то k = 2*2=4
И когда кто-то добавит, например по 1-му одного и другого, то будет k = 3*3=9
Где ошибка?

Наверно тогда не влияет на пропорцию одного к другому. Так то да, число должно изменяться, если множители меняются. В обоих вариантах пропорция 1:1. Значит получается, что к меняется. Значит я не правильно думаю. Пожалуй для меня это уже слишком сложно разобраться. Но почему число к меняется, а пропорция не меняется? Если важна пропорция (цена) зачем нужно к? Не проще была бы формула a/b=2/2=3/3... = 1 (в роли к) как в этом примере...
Post
Topic
Board Токены
Re: [***] Создаём экосистему мем-токена Chamby
by
viljy
on 25/07/2025, 08:02:54 UTC
k - const, - это константа. Это означает, что если в пул не вносили изменений, то есть никто не добавлял ликвидность в пул или не изымал ее из пула, то - это число k не должно изменяться! То есть покупки и продажи не влияют на эту константу,

Внесение и изъятие ликвидности тоже не влияет на к. Чтобы поменять к, надо старый пул торговой пары полностью удалить (что не на всех дексах возможно), и пересобрать новый пул с другим к (то есть по другому курсу). Однако тоже самое можно сделать просто торговыми сделками в старом пуле. Пересборки ЛП делают в исключительных случаях. Например, это последний метод вернуть привязку к доллару у алгоритмического стейблкоина. Например, у Fei USD такой метод даже был указан в вайтпейпере как "последний рубеж" (Это алгостейбл был с очень сложным заумным стартом, который был неудачным, а алгоритм привязки держится на жестоких штрафах и маленьких поблажках), впрочем все алгостейблы для крипторынка это как в телеге пятое колесо.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Is it still gambling if you're sure you're going to win?
by
viljy
on 25/07/2025, 07:43:26 UTC
There are event you can predict on that even though it's not 💯 guaranteed that you're going to win,  a level of certainty makes you think that you're surely going to win.

The downside of that feeling is that you might become over confident to use a big amount in the game since you're to a large extent certain that you're going to win.

Can we still say we are gambling if the event is something we are at least 90% sure that we are going to win?

If you are 90% sure of winning, then this game is 10% gambling. If we are talking about sports betting, then this can be a trap. By the way, if this confidence is present in many bettors, then such a bet does not make sense. The gain will be negligible relative to the loss (which still has a chance). In general, it would be nice if you could give a specific example of what exactly we are discussing. Since the situation you described looks somewhat abstract.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: No Amount is Affordable in Gambling
by
viljy
on 25/07/2025, 07:24:53 UTC
We are used to say that a gambler should gamble with an amount he can afford to lose but in the actual sense do we think there is any amount a gambler can afford to lose? When a gambler places a stake what he sees is not the stake but the potential win. This is why when he does not win he panics regardless of how little the stake is and he will always mention the potential win rather than the stake as the amount lost. The gambling system especially sports betting works in a way that as a game plays the value of the stake keeps increasing and what may appear to be what the gambler can afford to lose may rise and become what he can no longer afford to lose and this becomes a source of concern for the gambler if he losses the bet. In fact, if a gambler accumulates the total of what he thinks he can afford to lose he would know that he is losing what he cannot afford to lose. I think that any penny spent on gambling is a money the gambler have decided to sacrifice with the hope of getting a bigger amount and not because he can afford to lose it.

What's your position on this thought?

The cumulative effect of the amounts of money lost over a long period of time does not mean a contradiction. You just have to keep in mind that the real meaning of this phrase is: "you should play for money that you can lose today." Of course, if you add up all these amounts, you will get an amount, the one-time loss of which would be unacceptably large for you. But the time factor, which you consider as an accumulation of losses, can also be considered the other way around - as an "installment plan" of losses. Therefore, gamblers allocate a certain percentage of their income for a bankroll for a certain time period (month or week).
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: The "Lottery Ticket" Mentality
by
viljy
on 24/07/2025, 06:49:19 UTC
Well, it's akin to "magical" thinking. It is essentially a belief in miracles. It happens that such people also perform certain rituals and actions (each has its own special ones) when they place bets or in the process of gambling. By the way, any person can have similar psychological phenomena (we all hope to win), only to a much lesser extent. This belief in a miracle captures a "lottery" person to a much greater extent than most people.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: When gambling what do you measure? Luck or chances?
by
viljy
on 24/07/2025, 05:05:26 UTC
Different gambling activities have different chances attached to them and when I mean chances I am referring to the probability you have for actually win the bet or hit the jackpot in games like crash and slots. This is basically because sometimes unrealistic bets can sometimes play out as a win and some other times bets that have a high winning chance can eventually become the losing bet.

I believe people who gamble on sports may understand this better since sometimes in sports betting some gambler's prefer to go for the smaller odds that usually have a higher winning chance and sometimes they can still end up a losing game however some prefer to go for the big game with big odds and smaller winning chances.

What's usually your pick as a gambler since sometimes some persons are luckier than others?

It is impossible to calculate the odds in slots, because it is like a "black box" about which only RTP and the maximum multiplier are known. The odds can be known in advance in roulette, as the game is completely transparent to mathematics. Based on this, various strategies are used. For slots, the more spins there are, the greater the chance of getting a big multiplier that will outweigh the House Advantage. However, the stakes are small (because the bankroll is limited). You can make big bets in roulette, because there is no point in a large number of spins (this works for House Advantage). If we draw an analogy with betting, then I would rather prefer high odds. A small chance of winning can be increased by several bets of this kind. At least it's more interesting than betting on favorites all the time.
Post
Topic
Board Games and rounds
Re: Betpanda.io | BTC Price Prediction | Prize- $100 | 5 places paid| 24/07/2025
by
viljy
on 24/07/2025, 04:35:19 UTC
Betpanda.io ID: QJLQPM
Your Prediction: $118,383
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: What Does "Being Rich" Even Mean Anymore?
by
viljy
on 24/07/2025, 04:32:16 UTC
There is a certain amount of truth in this, but nevertheless it is better to be rich, albeit with constant stress (from fear of losing wealth), than to be poor with exactly the same stress (from lack of money for everything). However, if a person has enough money for his existence (without frills and luxuries), that is, he is neither rich nor poor, then such a person can be satisfied with his life. Unless he is overcome by greed or envy for greater wealth. But modern society is built in such a way that such a person will look like an anomaly if he is not constantly in the state of a squirrel on a wheel.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: The Ultimate Scarcity
by
viljy
on 24/07/2025, 04:20:37 UTC
No one will argue with the fact that time is the greatest value. Time cannot be replaced by anything; lost time cannot be returned. The saddest thing is that it is impossible to correct your mistakes or actions committed in the past. We can only learn from our experience so that we don't make mistakes in the future. But even this is not always possible and not everyone succeeds in doing it. Alas, a person begins to truly appreciate the time allotted to him by fate only with age. Young people feel like they have an eternity ahead of them.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Ensuring generational wealth
by
viljy
on 23/07/2025, 07:23:45 UTC
We can build wealth now and leave all our assets to our kids but how can be sure they can protect the wealth and make it grow even more?

There's no way to guarantee. As a rule, the first generation earns a fortune, the second generation increases, and the third generation loses. Of course, there are exceptions, such as families that have maintained wealth for centuries, but in general, the law of three generations always works. Although at the same time, inequality is growing in society, as well as the proportion of those who inherited wealth. However, the latter is due to the fact that in most cases it is not the heirs themselves who manage this wealth, but professional managers. By the way, it seems that Winston Churchill is credited with the phrase: "From wooden shoes to wooden shoes - the journey of four generations: the first generation makes money, the second generation multiplies it, the third generation spends it, and the fourth generation goes back to the factory."
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Does the novelty wear off?
by
viljy
on 23/07/2025, 06:36:18 UTC
If you are extremely rich and you can just gamble up to your heart's content, does the novelty of winning wear off? Like would you get tired of gambling since there's really not much risks because you can gamble with any amount and still receive little to no consequences?

A thread with a similar theme was recently published https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5549235.0
The absence of risk of losses (since losses will be imperceptible on the scale of wealth) reduces excitement, and therefore reduces the passion of the gambler. This is what concerns the impact of enormous wealth. The novelty effect is a bit different. This is a psychological phenomenon strongly associated with satiation (everything is available to the rich).

This is when a person constantly needs new stimuli for emotions; literally every day a new one is needed. As a result, a person loses his psychological self-sufficiency and becomes dependent on external stimuli. In fact, these are open doors for hidden external control over a person.

By the way, this is why in some countries the real power was often held by all sorts of favorites close to the throne, or political figures (for example, Cardinal Richelieu), and not by the kings themselves, who were engaged only in entertainment and hunting (external stimuli).
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: What is the cost of your mistakes?
by
viljy
on 23/07/2025, 05:36:49 UTC
⭐ Merited by adaseb (1)
If you are referring exclusively to sports betting, then many people are already using predictive AI in this area, although this is not widely advertised. In essence, sports betting is turning into a kind of science, where the human factor is replaced by algorithms and statistical predictions. As for my personal experience, it was in this area that I did not have any absolutely monstrous mistakes (and as a result, losses), as well as in the field of investing in crypto. There were more situations of lost profits as a result of excessive caution.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Why some countries gamble more than the others?
by
viljy
on 23/07/2025, 05:06:31 UTC
~
Is it fair to assume that a better economy and a solid framework will make people gamble more but be addicted less? This is the source, by the way.

There are two different things. In which countries do people spend the most money on gambling?  The second thing is which countries have the most people gambling in them. The statistics from the article show only the first one. This only shows that the population of these countries is richer on average. However, there are countries where the majority of the population gambles, despite the fact that the average population is poor. By the way, for a poor player, $10 can be just as significant as $1,000 for a rich one. So the country's economy affects the average gambling spending. But the prevalence of gambling among the population may be the same as in poor countries.
Post
Topic
Board Токены
Re: [***] Создаём экосистему мем-токена Chamby
by
viljy
on 22/07/2025, 17:23:24 UTC
Сегодня кто-то опять внес прилично ликвидности и курс подрос, а бот сделал какую-то копеечную покупку, видимо что-то выровняв в пуле.

Крупный поставщик ЛП (UQAl9rpNGXNXl5hOPIbfFKxSU4B4E5AwrFuve-GXEuN4-81g) переложил ликвидность из своего пула Чамби-USDe в главный пул Чамби-USDT. Так что теперь бот (UQDsjZ-ir42ijpgQBPoxhtsXvUYzDo8CNjyQrFFjV-71oo4t) сможет отщипывать от  Чамби кусочки поменьше на арбитраже.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Investment is for everyone
by
viljy
on 22/07/2025, 06:39:54 UTC
Hearing testimonies from different sources, I can only conclude that "You don’t need to be rich to invest, but you need to invest to be rich." Riches aside, investment can increase your financial freedom, but the problem with most people is procrastination, they want this BIG capital to invest, but it is not like that.

From real estate, stocks to crypto, we have seen people buying their assets that were deem worthless, but suddenly became their source of wealth. I remember someone who couldn't afford a land at the city center but wanted to invest. He bought it at a rural area where he could buy over 1 acre. Not long after, the government decided to build a Federal university in that locality. Right now, a plot of land there can buy a plot of land in the city center that he couldn't afford, that is the power of investing.

It mustn't be convenient, it mustn't be in thousands of dollars, a little that is being consistent about and carefully thought through could make that wealth. Start investing today.

When this person bought the land plot, did he already know that a university would be built there? I don't think he knew. In this case, what is the thoughtfulness of his investment? After all, this man was accidentally lucky. If he had bought up a lot of land around the city, it would have been a well-thought-out investment (if the city expanded in any direction, the land in that direction would increase in value). In short, investments are only carefully thought out when the investment portfolio is diversified. And this is impossible with a small amount of money. With a small amount of money, it's just a lottery.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Have you been addicted to gambling in the past.
by
viljy
on 22/07/2025, 06:15:41 UTC
This question is for those gamblers that were once addicted to gambling and was able to come out from addiction.

How did you go about it?

Was someone there to help you out or you took the bold step all alone?

How long did your addiction last?


What's your best advice to gamblers fighting with addiction?

I was addicted to gambling in the early stages. I caught myself in time, which saved me from getting into a difficult situation. Moreover, I was helped to realize that something was wrong with me by the example of one of my friends who was losing a lot of money (eventually he lost a share in the business and his family broke up).

By the way, to overcome gambling addiction, you can use such a method as substitution with something equally interesting. For example, I switched to MMORPG games then. Now it seems to me that esports can be a good choice. Of course, it is not necessary to do this; if you have a strong will, you can overcome gambling addiction. However, people with a deep degree of gambling addiction are unlikely to be able to play responsibly in the future. They will probably be forced to completely give up gambling (just as it is impossible to be a responsible addict).
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Would you allow your underage kid to use your detail for KYC after a big win.
by
viljy
on 22/07/2025, 05:05:28 UTC
~
As a parent to the child, can you allow the child to use your details to pass KYC verification, if asked? And if you do that, does it also mean that you are supporting underage gambling?

For me, this situation looks purely hypothetical, since I would not allow a minor to play, since it is prohibited. In general, I do not welcome any violations of casino rules. If I don't like some rules, I'd rather ignore such a casino than look for loopholes to circumvent the rules. Moreover, there are a lot of alternatives in the gambling industry, including even without KYC (where the described situation with a minor would not have arisen at all).
Post
Topic
Board Токены
Re: [***] Создаём экосистему мем-токена Chamby
by
viljy
on 22/07/2025, 04:54:39 UTC
А ведь могли бы хотя бы из благодарности к проекту, который позволили им на изи заработать, хотя бы 1 токен на адресе оставить, верно? Просто для того, чтобы адрес светился в холдерах.

Зато у него какая-то интересная подпись для чамби в ярких цветах, и смотрится неплохо. Подписи на баунти менеджерах больше привлекают внимание, чем на обычных пользователях, так что в какой-то мере получается, что участник дропа не просто продал, а сделал хоть что-то полезное для проекта. Немного лучше чем ничего.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Economic differences between older and younger generation
by
viljy
on 21/07/2025, 12:53:33 UTC
The difference in economic behavior is due to a lack of confidence in the prospects. Previously, people could save money and invest in the future. Moreover, to the detriment of their standard of living in the present, now the young do not see the point in this. The meaning disappeared due to uncertainty about the future. Therefore, one should live here and now. Whether this is right or wrong is far from an easy question. Now is the era of the end of capitalism, an era of complete uncertainty. It's like the era of the collapse of the Roman Empire. After that, absolutely the entire European elite changed. There was no one left from the ancient elite. Moreover, what can an ordinary person hope for, even if the most difficult times come for the elite in the coming decades? Therefore, intuitively feeling all this, the new generation lives for its pleasure here and now.