will BTC = old left

while

proof of one-wayness is Private. 

only 2 combos there but nobody seemed to know why. 

not satoshi's original paper

but look, take the hashing of random data aka proof of work and flip the hashing backwards.  suddenly, a one way function with 99.999% of "non honest" nodes is required to double spend. 

the development was good.  blockchain as a tech gained a lot of support from both open source and investment communities.  then suddenly, around 2016 presidential campaign, all lead developers and militancy appeared to vanish. 

You have to claim in court that his dick regrew and replacement technology doesn't exist simultaneously. That's impossible! Cody was illegally replaces and will be receiving a large settlement from whoever did it for defamation

Then the real Cody Wilson was assassinated.

By the time Cody Wilson was executed by the state under Barack Obama he had already been physically castrated ( no dick ) and that was in 2015

I know for a fact that Cody Wilson was dead and replaced by communists when the alleged charges of sexual misconduct occurred. He was replaced by communists and I will see him freed in an automated trial!

Who are involved in censoring this website? It's a threat to my freedom of speech

What do you think?

Leftists are parasitic hosts by design. They are genetically engineered to be so.  When the Leftist is trapped, stressed, or outed it's brain becomes eschemic.  Without blood flow the Leftist becomes brain dead. Next something even weirder happens.  A crab is conceived in its lower abdomen which eats the host body and brain.  This is the same crab commonly known for the sexually transmitted infection 'crabs' which infects pubic hairs in men and women.  The difference is that the crab growing inside leftists is about 5 feet in length. 

Bitcoin cannot handle "spam transactions" properly and doesn't appear to have the ability to update to a blockchain protocol that would allow them to do so.  Unless I am mistaken and they have done so already?  Can someone cross check this please? 

Think of "sharded forks" not as a new chain but as a less trusted block.  Once a "shard" gains a certain amount of transaction volume, it should be verified by the unsharded chain. 

They aren't scamming and they typically don't put Vlad's work in, but I think this is an important solution to transaction limits, a huge focus in blockchain.  For example, a credit card company can process a huge number of transactions but with limited decentralization. 

Ethereum will surpass bitcoin if they can successfully implement "sharded forks" to increase maximum transaction volume. 

ya sharding would work unless someone placed a huge bet on a sharded chain in which case it could be stolen.  it's just a subnet for processing transactions.  That's why I recommend above, a limited transaction size for each sharded fork. 

It's not a way to hard fork a chain.  It's a way to process more transactions by creating a number of smaller networks.  By splitting the transactions to subnets, "sharding" allows the system of networks to handle "spam" transactions aka micro payments. 

can someone please send to the ethereum devs, vlad, or vitalik

On the proposed "Sharded Transaction Limit"

The sharded fork is a good idea for improving a blockchain system's N traction limits, where N is the amount of transactions but could benefit from having a sharded transaction size limit for each sharded fork.  By setting a maximum transaction amount per sharded for S_i^Namount <= amount_{max i} where i is each sharded fork.  

This allows for scaling the security of transactions in terms of nodes verifying each transaction for the amount of coins transacted per block.  

An example:

Shard 1 can verify amounts up to 100 coins per block and has x proving nodes

Shard 2 can verify amounts up to 200 coins per block and has 2x proving nodes

.
.
.
Shard N can verify amounts up to N*100 coints per block and has Nx proving nodes

ok vpn coin works with a proof of retrieval and https websites only

if you could solve using the signing key in the blockchain without losing the key you would have a huge breakthrough. 

Gladius spins p2p vpn in a better way.  People typically use vpn's to hide their ip addresses and browsing history.  This is possible but with the lack of a proof of bandwidth it isn't possible for http.  It would require a specialized browser as well.  

Sounds to be a good project if they can figure out the development part.  

edit: I stand corrected I don't think that Gladius is possible.  It requires either proof of bandwidth or usage of a signing key in the blockchain.  Impossible so far! 

I'm not the one who originally published on this and had some belief that it was redundant.  It would be illegal to mine so maybe it would go to large state actors.  You could invest.  I think it would go to hardened bot herders such as the types you see at defcon.