"All good deeds go unpunished"

Rex is one of the few ICOBench experts that bust plentiful of scammy ICO, see https://archive.ph/thXBj

1. In no uncertain terms, nobody should be making any payment to ICOBench.

2. The volunteer / pro bono admins in the previous official ICOBench Telegram chat group had attempted to reach the ICOBench staff in June 2020 but ICOBench official team members were responsive at all.

3. The best indication that ICOBench is closed for business is when the ICOBench Telegram chat group owner deleted its group.

4. In any case, no rational person should be making blind payment to any entity before verifying that they are still in business.

A posting by one Tagz victim:

"*TAGZ EXCAHNGE - THE WORLD'S LARGEST SCAM EXCHANGE*
This exchange has done investors nothing but a great damage to our funds. Few months ago I have 1.13344 Ethereum in my wallet, which they end up converting to 2321 tagz, and now they are talking about converting tagz to tagz5 at the rate of 28,000 to 1 respectively. Do the guys running this exchange have conscience at all? From that derivation with my 2321 tagz I will be receiving 0.08 tagz5 after swap. An account with a balance of 1.13344 ethereum which was around $210 then now will be reduced to nothing. How does this encourage investors?
Honestly, enough is enough these criminal minded fellows need to be stopped. They are yet to reach their goals. They end up coming up with strategies to steal more and they have showed from onset that their exchange is all about scamming and stealing from investors. I know I have lost my funds to this scam we need to help others who are yet to know about their schemes. Let us all report them in whatever medium we can. Please let us do it before it get worst. "

Source: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/tagz.com
Cache: https://archive.md/vAD2m

Hal Finney, the one who first appreciated Satoshi's seminal work on Bitcoin.

@Hal: "I thought I'd write about the last four years, an eventful time for Bitcoin and me.

For those who don't know me, I'm Hal Finney. I got my start in crypto working on an early version of PGP, working closely with Phil Zimmermann. When Phil decided to start PGP Corporation, I was one of the first hires. I would work on PGP until my retirement. At the same time, I got involved with the Cypherpunks. I ran the first cryptographically based anonymous remailer, among other activities."

:
:
:

Speaking of heirs, I got a surprise in 2009, when I was suddenly diagnosed with a fatal disease. I was in the best shape of my life at the start of that year, I'd lost a lot of weight and taken up distance running. I'd run several half marathons, and I was starting to train for a full marathon. I worked my way up to 20+ mile runs, and I thought I was all set. That's when everything went wrong.

My body began to fail. I slurred my speech, lost strength in my hands, and my legs were slow to recover. In August, 2009, I was given the diagnosis of ALS, also called Lou Gehrig's disease, after the famous baseball player who got it.

:
:
:

That's my story. I'm pretty lucky overall. Even with the ALS, my life is very satisfying. But my life expectancy is limited. Those discussions about inheriting your bitcoins are of more than academic interest. My bitcoins are stored in our safe deposit box, and my son and daughter are tech savvy. I think they're safe enough. I'm comfortable with my legacy."

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=155054.0

Dedicating the beauty of 2020 to Hal Finney:

2020 is a beautiful number because:
o 2020 = 2^2 * 5 * 101
o 2020 = 16^2 + 42^2
o 2020 = 24^2 + 38^2
o 2020 = 2^11 - 28
o 2020 = 10 x 9 x 8 + (7 + 6) x 5 x 4 x (3 + 2) x 1 [Acknowledgement: Mikko / Finland]
o 2020 = (1 + 1) × (11111 − 1)/11 [Ack/start: Prof Taneja]
o 2020 = 2 × (2 × (222 + 22) − 2)
o 2020 = 3 + (3 + 3) × (333 + 3) + 3/3
o 2020 = 4 + (4 + 4) × (44 − 4)
o 2020 = 55 + 55 × (5 − 5 × 5) − 5
o 2020 = (6 − 6/6 )× ((6 + 6)/6 + 6 × 66 + 6)
o 2020 = 77/7 + 7 × (7 × (7 × 7 − 7) − 7)
o 2020 = (8 × (8 × 8 × 8 − + × 8/(8 +
o 2020 = (9 + 9) × (99/9 + 999)/9 = 2020 [Ack/end: Prof Taneja]
o 2020 = ((10 x 9 x 8 x 7 x6)/5+(4 x 3))/(2+1) [Ack: Chris & Colin)
o Q(-2020^0.5) = 8 [relating to ring of integers]

For those of us who are nuts about 2020, check out Prof Taneja's paper titled "2020 in Numbers: Mathematical Style" here: http://[Suspicious link removed]/20p2h

Blessed and Happy New Year to all!

Looks like a continuation of fake AI from Invacio team members.

Expose of Invacio here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5134006.20

A related link exposing Tagz as a scam: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5132555.0

As at 10 July 2019, there are 65 class members in the ICO Class Action against Invacio: https://ico-class-action.org/class-actions/invacio-ai.

The related Telegram group (with over 400 members) can be found here: https://t.me/InvancioAIRecovery

Found "Dr rex" response to "markushumprey": http://ye.sg/download/crypto/Debunking%20a%20False%20Accusation.htm

New Evidence Suggests Satoshi Nakamoto Is Paul Solotshi, The Creator of Encryption Software E4M and TrueCrypt
https://www.investinblockchain.com/new-evidence-suggests-satoshi-nakamoto-is-paul-solotshi-the-creator-of-encryption-software-e4m-and-truecrypt/

Well done Wei Liu (from Coinsummer).

He just demonstrated how everybody can be Satoshi with US Copyright System!

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/everyone-can-be-satoshi-wei-liu-on-contesting-craig-wrights-copyright

As at 13 Apr 2019, 3 Faketoshis that have abused the US Copyright System:
1. Maria, Ronald Keala Kua (2017)
2. Gontarek, Ryan Michael (2018)
3. Wright, Craig Steven (2019)

See details here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5951.msg51177581#msg51177581

As at 13 Apr 2019, 3 Faketoshis that have abused the US Copyright System:
1. Maria, Ronald Keala Kua (2017)
2. Gontarek, Ryan Michael (2018)
3. Wright, Craig Steven (2019)

********************************************************

Type of Work:    Recorded Document
Document Number:    V9952D822
Date of Recordation:    2017-12-18
Entire Copyright Document:    V9952 D822 P1
Date of Execution:    09Dec17
Title:    Thesatoshinakamoto.com & Bitcoincopyrights.com.
Notes:    Assignment agreement.
Party 1:    Ronald Keala Kua Maria a.k.a. Satoshi Nakamoto.
Party 2:    Bervar & Jones Lawfirm.
   
Names:    Maria, Ronald Keala Kua
   Nakamoto, Satoshi
   Bervar & Jones Lawfirm   
_________________________________________

Type of Work:    Recorded Document
Document Number:    V9953D792
Date of Recordation:    2017-12-28
Entire Copyright Document:    V9953 D792 P1
Date of Execution:    17Dec17
Title:    No titles given.
Notes:    Assignment agreement
Party 1:    Ronald Keala Kua Maria a.k.a. Satoshi Nakamoto.
Party 2:    Bervar and Jones Lawfirm.
   
Names:    Maria, Ronald Keala Kua
   Nakamoto, Satoshi
   Bervar and Jones Lawfirm

_________________________________________
   
Type of Work:    Text
Registration Number / Date:    TXu002037698 / 2016-08-17
Application Title:    AN EQUITY BASED ELECTRONIC RESERVE CURRENCY PEER TO PEER ELECTRONIC CASH SYSTEM.
Title:    AN EQUITY BASED ELECTRONIC RESERVE CURRENCY PEER TO PEER ELECTRONIC CASH SYSTEM.
Description:    Electronic file (eService)
Copyright Claimant:    Ronald Keala Kua Maria, 1971- . Address: 89226A Farrington Hwy, lot A, 89226A Farrington Hwy, lot A, Waianae, HI, 96792, United States.
Date of Creation:    2016
Authorship on Application:    Satoshi Nakamoto, pseud. of Ronald Keala Kua Maria, 1971- ; Citizenship: United States. Authorship: text, computer program, artwork.
Rights and Permissions:    Ronald Keala Kua Maria, aikoin.org, 89226A Farrington Hwy, lot A, lot A, Waianae, HI, 96792, United States, (808) 554-1341, (808) 554-1341, intactico@gmail.com
Copyright Note:    C.O. correspondence.
   
Names:    Maria, Ronald Keala Kua, 1971-
   Nakamoto, Satoshi, pseud., 1971-
   
_________________________________________

Type of Work:    Music
Registration Number / Date:    PAu003915822 / 2018-03-26
Application Title:    Bitcoin-illionaire.
Title:    Bitcoin-illionaire.
Description:    Electronic file (eService)
Copyright Claimant:    Ryan Michael Gontarek, 2018- . Address: 19 Heather Drive, Cottage Grove, WI, 53527, United States.
Date of Creation:    2018
Authorship on Application:    Satoshi Nakamoto, pseud. of Ryan Michael Gontarek, 2018- (author of pseudonymous work); Domicile: United States; Citizenship: United States. Authorship: lyrics.
Pre-existing Material:    music, musical arrangement.
Basis of Claim:    lyrics.
Copyright Note:    Regarding limitation of claim: deposit contains lyrics only
   
Names:    Gontarek, Ryan Michael, 2018-
   Nakamoto, Satoshi, pseud., 2018-

_________________________________________

Type of Work:    Text
Registration Number / Date:    TXu002136996 / 2019-04-11
Application Title:    Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
Title:    Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
Description:    Electronic file (eService)
Copyright Claimant:    Craig Steven Wright, 1970- . Address: Cozen O’Connor, 277 Park Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10172.
Date of Creation:    2008
Authorship on Application:    Satoshi Nakamoto, pseud. of Craig Steven Wright, 1970- (author of pseudonymous work); Domicile: United Kingdom; Citizenship: Antigua and Barbuda. Authorship: text.
Copyright Note:    C.O. correspondence.
   Regarding copyright claimant: Change made to record on 5/20/2019
   
Names:    Wright, Craig Steven, 1970-
   Nakamoto, Satoshi, pseud., 1970-

_________________________________________

Type of Work:    Computer File
Registration Number / Date:    TX0008708058 / 2019-04-13
Application Title:    Bitcoin.
Title:    Bitcoin.
Description:    Electronic file (eService)
Copyright Claimant:    Craig Wright. Address: Cozen O’Connor, 277 Park Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY 10172.
Date of Creation:    2009
Date of Publication:    2009-01-03
Nation of First Publication:    United States
Authorship on Application:    Satoshi Nakamoto, pseud. of Craig Steven Wright, 1970- (author of pseudonymous work); Domicile: United Kingdom; Citizenship: Australia. Authorship: computer program.
Rights and Permissions:    Craig Wright, Cozen O’Connor, 277 Park Avenue, 20th Floor, New York, NY, 10172, United States, (212) 883-4909, adivino@cozen.com
Copyright Note:    C.O. correspondence.
   Regarding copyright claimant: Change made to record on 5/20/2019
   
Names:    Wright, Craig Steven, 1970-
   Nakamoto, Satoshi, pseud., 1970-
   Wright, Craig
   
_________________________________________   

Source: https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?SAB1=satoshi&BOOL1=all+of+these&FLD1=Name%3A+All+%28KNAM%29+%28KNAM%29&GRP1=AND+with+next+set&SAB2=nakamoto&BOOL2=as+a+phrase&FLD2=Name%3A+All+%28KNAM%29+%28KNAM%29&PID=CZf9A3KejQ5SBa3UyDhimX-1Df&SEQ=20190522225735&CNT=25&HIST=1

An interview with Invacio CEO back in March 18th 2018 - full of lies on hindsight.

______________________

Posted on March 10, 2018 by Tech Company News Editorial   
Below is our recent interview with William West, the Founder and CEO of Invacio: William West

Q: Could you provide our readers with a brief introduction to Invacio?

A: My name is William J.D. West, and I’m the Founder of Invacio.

Invacio is a cutting-edge technology company that has created a level-3 (Self-learning) artificial intelligence and is ready to bring it to the global market.

Invacio’s “Jean” is a state-of-the-art, multi-faceted A.I. system that can work as a stand-alone “market specific” module, or as a bigger network of more than 30 individual modules, working together to create one of the most sophisticated Artificial Intelligence platforms on Earth.

Invacio brings together the world’s largest repository of organized data with the most advanced A.I. technology known to man… and is working to make it accessible to EVERYONE on the planet.

Invacio is committed to a socially conscious approach, realizing that this new technology not only comes with immense benefits, but also with potential hazards. Accordingly, we are focused on ethics and optics, as well as a technically sound offering.

With this in mind we are inviting the public to be part of our early growth and to participate in our success.

It was only recently that we determined to pursue an ICO, having originally intended to pursue a more conventional course. Yet as we came to understand how completely an ICO accords with the values that lay at the heart of the company — with our concern for privacy, security, innovation, and inclusiveness — it quickly became obvious that an ICO was by far the most appropriate route for the company to take. The ethics and desire for transparency made it virtually impossible to go with a traditional capital raise.
I can’t say it’s been perfect…(we hit a little speed-bump when the market dropped in early February) but overall we are very pleased.

Q: Could you tell us something more about your ICO?

A: Gladly! We are very excited by the response we’ve had so far.

We came out of the gate strong, but with little previous ICO experience, we made a few mistakes. Not enough marketing budget spent in the right places, combined with one of our major marketing and advertising resources (Facebook) blocking ICOs only one day after we launched the Pre-sale! We took the market downturn as an opportunity to hit the pause button and reset our strategy.

So far, it looks like it was the right move, we’ve picked up our previous momentum and are adding new accounts, and people to our Telegram group faster than any time until today!

The coins are $1.00 and we have a bonus scale starting at 50% that slides to 10% over time as the Pre-sale goes on. That is, you can buy 100 coins for $100 (our minimum purchase) and you would receive 50 bonus coins- as it sits today. The number of bonus coins will decrease the longer the sale goes on, as demand increases and we get closer to a public release on the exchanges.

Q: Can you give us more insights into your technology?

A: We have access to or control more than 2.5 billion separate data-sets.
Some are from NASA.

Some are from accounting firms, and some are bowling scores from the 1970’s…but all combined, they are the largest repository of data in existence. And all of them are accessed by Jean as she crunches data in endless ways to teach herself about the world.

Invacio’s technology has already shown outstanding performance in live tests that have run the whole range of our products and services, from our ‘Zero-Knowledge’ end-to-end encrypted communications, groundbreaking data repository and financial offerings, to TAMIUS, the revolutionary decentralized Blockchain banking system that underlies our crypto currency.

Watchful for any potential regulatory changes, and sensitive to the potential global ramifications of the recent adoption of crypto currency by certain countries and banks, we are developing our own Blockchain — built for speed, privacy, stability, and security — to suit our future plans.

To this end we have teams in place looking at the applications of Blockchain to distributed-AI, and also at work testing ways that we can establish a Blockchain able to work off-grid. Just as our current fintech tests have been, all research after a certain point in development will be conducted with the greatest possible (and practical) transparency.

In consequence of the research done by the Applied Tech division at Invacio Labs, Tamius is able to offer a military grade, secure and free-to-operate, online communications framework that will allow transactions to be conducted even in the remotest and densest of environments.

WeNet does not require the internet infrastructure, nor does it require a cellular network. Instead it uses ingenious methods to create a stable and portable internet gateway, in areas with zero internet connectivity. WeNet offers completely secure, stable, independent end-to-end encrypted communications systems for voice, video, financial and data communications in areas where this would be otherwise impossible.

Q: What makes Invacio unique and what is the company’s long term potential?

A: The ability to scale to the required size and deploy a specific module to serve the required network or segment is unique in the technology world, and garnered us an opportunity to unveil our system to the United Nations ESCAP when our Government Liaison, Michael J. Aumock was invited to speak at the FDI meeting in Nov, 2017. It was a rousing success, and helped set in motion the events that brings us here today.

Invacio presented the UN the many potential uses of our multi-agent system A.I. including the ethical generation of wealth and the management of disaster relief situations. This honor has allowed Invacio to begin forging ties with several national governments, and has opened the door for discussions regarding putting our technologies to work in the international arena.

Invacio therefore comes to this ICO in the unusual position of having already aroused international governmental interest, and, with fully conceived plans for the further development of several of our divisions (including the incorporation of Blockchain technologies into our distributed AI and transactional services, and the refinement of the ways our core-AI.

This existing international interest from both private and public sectors, combined with a well-funded roll-out plan and a clear, ethical mandate for the road ahead make Invacio a safe bet for the future. We acknowledge that our goals are a bit lofty, but what is A.I. if not the loftiest goal of all.

Q: What are your plans for next six months?

A: The next 6 months (and the 12 months or so after that) will see us launching several new products. We have already given our ICO participants access to INVmail, our zero-knowledge, encrypted communications system with burn capability.

Post ICO you will see us focusing on two areas for the next two quarters. First there is DATA, which is used to support fintech (Agnes, Archimedes and Aquila, our hedge fund) and disaster relief, as well as being basically the core of the A.I.

Second, is the Madhav Blockchain. This will include rolling out Tamius and wrapping that technology around the WeNet mechanics to begin to address the “Unbanked billions” around the globe and finally allow them to be part of the global economy. This amazing technology, which basically allows the internet to travel, completely encrypted, over radio waves similar to a walkie-talkie, will give even the most remote villages and peoples a way to connect with the rest of mankind, bringing education, knowledge and the ability to learn, to the people who for no other reason than being born someplace remote, have never had access to it before. Invacio’s future is bright, because we can brighten the future of these people, around the world.

Source: http://techcompanynews.com/invacio-delivers-cutting-edge-level-3-self-learning-artificial-intelligence-technology/
Archive: https://archive.fo/sT8uL

Coinmarketcap: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/invacio
Archive: https://archive.fo/U3ZNu

A letter to William from another one of his victims
11 May 2019 | Information, Intimidation, Lies, Misrepresentation, ICO Scams

On 11th May 2019 an Invacio token holder wrote the following message/letter to William in his Invacio Telegram group (see below) As with anyone who questions William the author was instantly banned from the group and the message was deleted.  If anyone else would like to speak out against William West, please contact us and we will share your story.

William:

You say it is the token holders responsibility to create awareness. No it is not. It is your responsibility. You created this company. You started this ICO. You made promises and you received the funds. And I don’t understand what is so difficult about giving your products and your (sic) groundbreaking AI to independent researchers, to journalists, to real influencers? Surely, if they are anywhere near is good as you claim they would be delighted to look into them and give them raving reviews. Unless, of course they aren’t what was promised.

Well now, all of that is too late anyway as you left the company, which according to you was never led by you? How is that even possible? Of course, you argue that Invacio was never lead by you, that Invacio AAP was without staff and CEO the entire time. Well, whatever you think, you can’t just hide behind your made up legal structure of companies pointing fingers at AAPs, Ltds and holdings. No one put money into a Seychelles AAP without a leader. They put it into you and Invacio. They put it into promises you made. What they got has very little to do with what you promised during the ICO. Now that everything has gone down the drain you have left the building. A far cry from the self portrayed image of an independently wealthy philanthropist who builds a company and creates an ICO so the masses can participate.

Well done! I hope you are proud of yourself. Btw do you remember what you said when Julian Hosp left TenX? You called him leaving his company an exit scam. What do you call your own actions?

Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5134006.new#new

Letter from a token holder "How I was scammed by William West"
7 May 2019 | Investment Scams, Misrepresentation, Fraud

I wanted to write to you to tell my story on how I was scammed by William West. I would appreciate it if you kept my identity anonymous as William West has my GDPR data. He has very vindictively used the private data of ex token holders to doxx, harass, slander and threaten them. I don't want to be another victim!

In April 2018 I decided to dig into my savings and purchased a number of Invacio tokens during their ICO.   Tamius and Aquilla were the main two reasons why I purchased the Invacio tokens. Tamius was Invacio’s flagship product/service. It was the first listed in their WP and was heavily marketed during the Initial Coin Offering (ICO) token sale. It was very exciting since Tamius was advertised as a complete banking service powered by the blockchain, merging both crypto and fiat currency. The underlying technology behind crypto currency is the blockchain. The Tamius product was the only Invacio product directly linked to blockchain technology. I was particularly interested in supporting companies that made use of this technology and wanted to be part of it. Taking this into account, Tamius was the main reason why I purchased the tokens. To add to this, its full release was only a matter of weeks away which further influenced my decision to purchase tokens. Invacio claimed that Tamius was 70% completed and due for full roll out in Q2 –Q3 2018.

After the ICO had ended, the main Invacio telegram group was shut down without warning by Invacio. At this point i was invited to join a new telegram group run by some Invacio token holders. It was here I made contact two ex team members of Invacio. These gentlemen helped with the marketing literature for Invacio and they both independently told the group that Tamius was nothing more than an idea in the head of Williams West (CEO). Both claimed nothing had been done in the development of Tamius. When I asked them why it had been advertised as 70% complete, they explained it was because William West had insisted it to be advertised as such. They claimed that Tamius was no more than an idea in Williams head. They told me that it had become abundantly clear that William West was a con man and they didn't want to be associated with a scam company, hence their reason for leaving.

A few months after the ICO, Invacio informed the public that the Tamius project had been shelved for good. As far as I can tell not a single thing was ever done to develop the banking solution that was supposedly 70% complete in January 2018. Invacio did produce a wallet in which you could store your Invacio tokens. It should be noted that this can be produced by a competent coder in a matter of days. You can also buy wallets off the shelf which I suspect is what Invacio did. Many crypto currencies produce wallets for their token holders and they are all free to use. The Invacio wallet (also free to download) has since been shelved because it was simply a terrible wallet. The fact the entire Tamius project has been ditched is not at all surprising to me and it proves my fears were warranted. I would also argue it strongly suggests the testimony of multiple ex Invacio team members to be truthful. This is one of many examples where in my opinion Invacio have grossly misrepresented themselves in order to entice investment for the financial gain of William West and his company.

The second product/service that sold Invacio to me was their hedge fund named Aquilla. The White Paper claimed that Aquilla was 100% competed and due for full roll out in Q2-Q3. Invacio described Aquilla as being “a hedge fund governed by human equity management” that employed “the full power of Invacios multi-agent AI, Invacio Data and fintech divisons”. The reason I was so interested in Aquilla was because Invacio had promised those that bought a certain minimum of tokens would receive actual share equity in the company Invacio Holding (UK) Ltd in return. This was a major draw to me since hedge funds can be extremely lucrative and I wanted to own a piece of it. Also, it’s not every day you are presented with the opportunity to invest in a hedge fund. This really excited me and the fact the WP advertised the hedge fund as being 100% completed led me to believe it was all set up and ready to go. How wrong I was.

I soon found out that Invacio had completely misled me. There was no hedge fund at all. The truth is, a few Invacio staff and friends had entrusted an associate with a few thousand dollars to invest in the forex market for them. However, the whole thing went pear shaped. The rumor goes that he either lost all their money in the market or ran off with it prior to the ICO. Either way the whole thing was an epic failure. Despite this terrible experience, Invacio decided that they now had a working hedge fund - Aquilla

William West and Invacio knowingly misrepresented Aquilla in order to gain investment form unsuspecting individuals like myself. Had I know the truth there is no chance I would have invested. As I have already stated, Aquilla was very attractive to me since I would essentially own a small piece of its success by way of the C Class shares I was to receive. As it turns out I was never given the equity in the form of C class shares in Invacio Holdings (UK) Ltd as set out in part 2 of the contract agreement. In fact nobody has received any equity in this company as it was dissolved in November 2018.

Another major reason why I invested into the Invacio project, was on the back of the news that they had received a massive investment from an unnamed outside party to the tune of 500 million dollars. This was big news to me and was a huge driver and confidence boost that Invacio really had something special. If someone was willing to invest such vast sums of money my thinking process was that they must have carried out an inordinate amount of due diligence before committing to such a large investment. This gave me the confidence to actually pull the trigger and make my purchase. Not only this but on the back of this huge investment Invacio had slashed their hard cap which stood at $100 million by over two thirds, making the token economics of the project very attractive to me.

It turns out that this was another massive lie by Invacio. The hype factor Invacio employed by concocting this falsehood worked and I was suckered in as I'm sure many others were. I thought I was investing into a well established legitimate  company who was on the verge of signing massive government contracts. I really believed that an outside party had actually invested $500 million into the company. I feel like such a fool now for believing them.

As is the case with all those investors who paid $1 per INV token as i did, we lost nearly all our money. William West didn't care a damn. I applaud Crypto Clover for exposing him. How William West has the nerve to point fingers at other projects such as ARB is beyond a joke.   

Thank you for taking the time to read this. I wish you well in your fight against William West

Source: https://invacioclassaction.com/expose/f/letter-from-a-token-holder-how-i-was-scammed-by-william-west

Long list of fraud committed by William James Dalrymple West (Founder of Invacio)
https://invacioclassaction.com/crimes

Invacio Equity & Payments through U.K. company (Evidence)
https://invacioclassaction.com/expose/f/equity-payments-through-uk-company?blogcategory=Fraud

Actions for Victims

ActionFraud UK
https://www.actionfraud.police.uk

What do I do if I think I’ve been scammed? (in UK)
https://www.ageuk.org.uk/information-advice/money-legal/scams-fraud/investment-scams

William James Dalrymple West (ex-CEO of Invacio) latest fake AI product:https://shotsling.com/

Cache 1: https://web.archive.org/web/20180801000000*/http://shotsling.com/
Cache 2: https://archive.fo/yxZEA

Telegram History in "INV Analytica Community [@invacioofficial]

---------------------------------- start

.....25.05.2018 22:00:01, R1 R1 [@R1R1B]: >>upgraded the group to a supergroup<<
.....25.05.2018 22:24:48, Hopsplat [@Hopsplat]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:24:52, Colin Ferrell [@ColinFerrell]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:25:07, James Beal [@Mrbates1]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:25:13, Youcanbecome: >>joined the group<<
25.05.2018 22:25:39, Corey Wilton - Help Desk [@CoreyWilton]: 🚀 Please don’t kick and punch, just discuss and have fun. Remember we are all on the same team.

We are now trading on the following exchanges: 💰
www.idex.market
www.mercatox.com
www.bancor.network
.....25.05.2018 22:25:43, Corey Wilton - Help Desk [@CoreyWilton]: >>unsupported service message type: messageActionPinMessage<<
.....25.05.2018 22:25:47, Kim [@kbyber]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:26:53, Tonyladz [@Tonyladz1]: >>joined the group<<
.....25.05.2018 22:26:59, Nash Geo [@NashGeo]: >>joined the group<<
25.05.2018 22:27:11, Nash Geo [@NashGeo]: INV 1 CENT CONFIRMED
:
:
:
24.04.2019 20:44:02, Laurel & Hardy [@LH03330323402r049r94]: As to the remark about this "being my community" and the tone taken.

This tone was taken as we have already been attacked in the past as a result of poorly worded / understood announcments.

Saying we "had confirmation for Binance/Bittrex would be a complete missrepresentation, for one we made it abundantly clear during that period we had 0 intention of listing on Binance due to privacy constraints this was only resolved when we moved ops for Invmail from outside the EU zone, as such we applied and we are waiting, we've never stated we had been accepted (in public) though have had discussions with Binance related people, also scammers pretending to be Binance people which has only ever been discussed in private groups.

The same for Bittrex, we've never said we'd agreed listing, in fact i do not believe we even stated we'd applied, though i could be wrong on the second part (applied).

I say "we" in the past tense as this brings me on to the next part.

I have made it abundantly clear i am no longer actively involved with Invacio and its day to day operations, truth be told, i have visited its site(s) 3 times in this month, 6 times last month.

I am the Founder (Group) though again non-active, and reluctantly the person who appears to be the face due to the depths i am in debt with the project whilst all others have dissappeared with their riches or onto pastures green.

I stepped away, and made it abundantly clear that 'i' refuse to allocate any more intellectual ideas to Invacio Group, or any of its subsidaries.

You have been given technologies as promised, there will not be anymore from me, these were delivered, you have two more technology offerings coming in Veritas and API, that is it from me, more importantly my commitments have been honoured, and Invacio Group honours its contractual agreements to Invacio AAP Holdings for technology provisions, even if the unlikely event the company is sold or broken apart for its IP, these contractual commitments to Invacio AAP Holdings will be honoured and will continue to serve those products as outlined and committed to.

As to the future of the INV project, i will speak frankly, if INV can not gain grassroots movement from its token-holders then it will never survive, you have more products than any other project out there hitting multiple market segments, you also have one of the lowest cap tokens in the market for such an array of offerings and yet there is just a few active people talking about the project.

As to my position - I hang around here as i am still accumulating INV, I believe it has a place and stand from the side(s) supporting it, i also do own 2xxk INV from my team tokens, which i'd burn if i would see any benefit, but i also believe i earned those tokens, and its the little i have recieved for all my commitments that have been honoured.

Invacio AAP Holdings? - What next, Invacio AAP Holdings has a contractual agreement to provide utility and products from Invacio's technologies, it has done this, and these remain active, and will continue to do so with the last two products releasing shortly.

Marketing as mentioned many times, Invacio AAP Holdings committed to 14% of realised, it records show it spent well over 1m USD in crypto during the coinsale which amounts to more than four times the unrealised crypto funds that are currently sat tethered, if those funds rise on the markets then i am sure that is to be re-addressed but it won't be anytime soon.

I truly hope (for my sake financially and others) that INV is able to rise, and that people talk about the merrits of the project, but i am not leading that charge but encouraging it, i am not running Invacio AAP Holdings, it has governing rules to follow and has followed it, delivering on its promises.

---------------------------------- end

Note: Laurel & Hardy [@LH03330323402r049r94] is yet another Telegram account of William James Dalrymple West (ex-CEO of Invacio)