Search content
Sort by
Showing 9 of 9 results by volapyk
Pascal Coin changed algo to the CPU friendly RandomHash in December 2018
The coin can no longer be dual mined.
The coin can no longer be dual mined.
I've recently setup Claymore v12.0 for Dual Ethereum+Pascal except I can't find a pool that appears to work with it.
I've tried nanopool, coinotron, & c3pool all with the same results lots of accepted shares and too many rejected shares:
When Claymore launches, it authorizes to the pools fine, but on the first batch it and everyone after that, it gets disconnected from the pool for too many rejects. I know they were going through in some fashion in that I got warnings on my c3pool setup of extremely high rejection rates for my account.
I've turned off overclocking on the GPU. I have a nVidia GTX 1070 that I'm using, I also have a 1060 I'm not using because I'm running Windows 10.
I have been able to connect with nicehash, but that seems to be so little compared to the hashrate 100-200 Mh/s for Pascal.
Any ideas? Thanks
I've tried nanopool, coinotron, & c3pool all with the same results lots of accepted shares and too many rejected shares:
Code:
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: Share rejected (0 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (16 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (47 ms)!
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: Share rejected (16 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (16 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (16 ms)!
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: Share rejected (0 ms)!
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: Share rejected (0 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (31 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (62 ms)!
PASC: Too many rejects from pool, disconnect...
PASC: - connection in 20 sec...
ETH: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - New job from us1.ethermine.org:5555
ETH - Total Speed: 28.831 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:04
ETH: GPU0 28.831 Mh/s
PASC - Total Speed: 182.597 Mh/s, Total Shares: 244, Rejected: 143
PASC: GPU0 182.597 Mh/s
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:20 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: Share rejected (0 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (16 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (47 ms)!
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: Share rejected (16 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (16 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (16 ms)!
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: Share rejected (0 ms)!
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - SHARE FOUND - (GPU 0)
PASC: Share rejected (0 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (31 ms)!
PASC: Share rejected (62 ms)!
PASC: Too many rejects from pool, disconnect...
PASC: - connection in 20 sec...
ETH: 02/24/19-12:50:21 - New job from us1.ethermine.org:5555
ETH - Total Speed: 28.831 Mh/s, Total Shares: 0, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:04
ETH: GPU0 28.831 Mh/s
PASC - Total Speed: 182.597 Mh/s, Total Shares: 244, Rejected: 143
PASC: GPU0 182.597 Mh/s
When Claymore launches, it authorizes to the pools fine, but on the first batch it and everyone after that, it gets disconnected from the pool for too many rejects. I know they were going through in some fashion in that I got warnings on my c3pool setup of extremely high rejection rates for my account.
I've turned off overclocking on the GPU. I have a nVidia GTX 1070 that I'm using, I also have a 1060 I'm not using because I'm running Windows 10.
I have been able to connect with nicehash, but that seems to be so little compared to the hashrate 100-200 Mh/s for Pascal.
Any ideas? Thanks
Re: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.5.8 (Linux / Windows)
Any way to run DSTM on GPU 0,1 and 2 and disable mining on 3, 4 and 5?
put --dev 0 1 2 in your bat
Thanks!
Re: [ANN]: cpuminer-opt v3.6.8, open source optimized multi-algo CPU miner
Thanks for the miner.
Is there any command to reduce the number of cores the miner is using or any other way to reduce heat and efficiency?
Thanks
Is there any command to reduce the number of cores the miner is using or any other way to reduce heat and efficiency?
Thanks
Yes you can limit the number of threads and there are some other options.
Always check the help: cpuminer --help
Note temperature limit only works on Linux.
Thanks!
I can be a little lazy from time to time.
If wishing donations I recommend adding some coins with cheaper transaction costs than BTC. For instance Pascal Coin - Infinite Scalability.
Been mining for a few months now and I have been experimenting with different settings.
Due to unstable wifi net in my office, where the landlord pays for the power
I have ordered a 4G smart router with a 8GB limitation per month, to take over when the network is unstable.
Does anybody know how much traffic a hashrate produces?
I am ming with approx 2.5K sols/s and I wonder how far I will get.
Not actually understanding the difficulty setting (Noob)... I am wondering if you can use the setting -zpsw x to increase or decrease the amount of traffic on you line.
Thanks
Due to unstable wifi net in my office, where the landlord pays for the power
I have ordered a 4G smart router with a 8GB limitation per month, to take over when the network is unstable.Does anybody know how much traffic a hashrate produces?
I am ming with approx 2.5K sols/s and I wonder how far I will get.
Not actually understanding the difficulty setting (Noob)... I am wondering if you can use the setting -zpsw x to increase or decrease the amount of traffic on you line.
Thanks
There seems to be an issue with -li mode.
I have tested out -li 2 and -li 8 for alle cards (unmodded rx 480)
I get the same sol/s reporting rate when running with -i 6. But far lass power use. But in the pool I only get about half the sol/s when running with -li 2.
Could there be a reporting error when running low intensity mode?
I have tested out -li 2 and -li 8 for alle cards (unmodded rx 480)
I get the same sol/s reporting rate when running with -i 6. But far lass power use. But in the pool I only get about half the sol/s when running with -li 2.
Could there be a reporting error when running low intensity mode?