Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 47 results by vujk
I also want to say this. I missed out on swapping 1.5 mill whitecoins because I was overseas. It was alot of money I lost out on. So please respect your early adopters and have a grace period. Not everyone is capable of following, and they should not lose out as I did. I do like a good coin burn, but be careful of who actually gets burned.
We are doing everything we can to ensure late comers can still swap. The biggest challenge will be for those who don't own their DNotes in their own wallet by the 16th. The process for post April 16th swaps will be lengthy and cumbersome as well, so we are hoping to have mostly everyone taken care of by the 16th.
Vujk, I am sorry to hear about your lose of 1.5 million whitecoins. That is most unfortunate. I have personally lost a lot of money in different cases - quite a sick feeling.
It is our wish that no legitimate owners of DNotes will be left behind beyond the April 16th soft dead line. The verification will be complex and time consuming with long wait time. However, there must be a cut off date sometime on the future, to be announced later. Meanwhile, 75% of the unclaimed DNotes will be used as DNotes guarantee funds, so that 25% will be available to support coin swaps that may continue to come in.
We appreciate every DNotes stakeholder for their support no matter how many DNotes they own. One day many more will appreciate DNotes as the trusted brand dedicated to the benefit of everyone.
I agree with a hard deadline. Your team sends emails, unlike some other shady coins, read up. I am glad to be on board. The vision outways the price of a coin. ICO's are done, what you guys are doing , thats the future, and wil be the new standard. I see value in that.
I also want to say this. I missed out on swapping 1.5 mill whitecoins because I was overseas. It was alot of money I lost out on. So please respect your early adopters and have a grace period. Not everyone is capable of following, and they should not lose out as I did. I do like a good coin burn, but be careful of who actually gets burned.
Been on board ever since you announced that partnership with Geneca a few months ago,, what can I say promising project, solid work all around, great team. What more could you possibly want from an ICO?
I have been also. Love the communication and the knowledge from the team. This has to be one of the most undervalued coins at the moment.
Re: [ANN] Titanium - World's First Decentralised Cloud Services Provider 🚀
the new slogan of titanium 
is a gag
We officially raised $ 35 million in just 18 days into ICO. Thanks everyone for participating and supporting us. We are now flying to Acapulco and looking forward to cocktails and many girls o the beach
is a gag We officially raised $ 35 million in just 18 days into ICO. Thanks everyone for participating and supporting us. We are now flying to Acapulco and looking forward to cocktails and many girls o the beach
This statement is total BS!!
Their is noway that CEO could pull any girls even with 35 million dollars.
Re: [ANN] (XWC) | WhiteCoin | NEWS: Foundation, investors, WhiteOS ☯ whitecoin.info
Doesn't help much if you are deployed and your hard drive is in storage. How would you like it if you go overseas and your bank account is cleaned out when you get back?
Re: [ANN] (XWC) | WhiteCoin | NEWS: Foundation, investors, WhiteOS ☯ whitecoin.info
I had 1.5 mill coins. You guys are crooks. Just because I was absent for 5 months doesn't mean you have the right to destroy my property. Just look here https://www.richlist.eu/whitecoin/ , and you will see the future of this coin. 
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
I have went through this with 290x's. Downclock them to 947 core clock, like 290's if you are getting 99% stuck. I do not know why, but it works. Do not delete WU's, just restart the machine. This has worked for me.
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
how to stop this sticking at 99.99% ? it is happening on a few rigs now. Didn't happen before.
Try underclocking your core clock on your card a tad.
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
Now both my machines are sticking on downloading WU's. Even a restart of the client will not fix them. Anyone else having this problem?
kqpahv mentioned this error on the previous page but restarting the client did reset his.
You're welcome
Now only thing I am checking is GPU utilization and if thats 95+% I dont care about the numbers that the client is showing anymore.
I'v got a different problem myself now: Some GPU's get stuck downloading new WU's
Stays on "downloading" forever with no getwork server address available. Restarting the client solves this but is really uncomfortable if you have many rigs to keep an eye on.... This started yesterday, anyone experiencing the same thing ?
Check the log and see if you are getting the same error message he got. So far I have not run into this error but I am watching for it.
I am getting "05:32:12:ERROR:WU00:FS00:Exception: Server did not assign work unit". 2 out of 4 card on one machine, and 2 out of 3 on the other. Rebooting them didn't even fix it.
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
Looks like I'm going to need a little help with one of my computers. Apparently the GPU's in one of my computers are producing half the expected PPD. I had mentioned this a few days ago and was going to rebuild it from scratch which I have done. Then I slowed down the GPU's to avoid WU that were essentially crashing. Then I let it run for a couple of days and timed it's work units compared to the computers next to it who's GPU's are running at the same speeds and one particular computer is indeed running at half normal speed and I have no idea why.
The hardware is actually identical to five other computers in that room and the GPU's in the others computers are running at twice the speed (in terms of PPD) of the computer in question. The reporting has been extremely consistent but I am puzzled as to why. All the computers in that room are running two R9 290X TRIX GPU's and it is only the GPU's that are showing half the speed. All the computers are using Catalyst 14.4 drivers.
I know many will suspect the GPU's are being bottle necked. Each machine has a I7 4770K and I'm only using one core to fold and there are only two R9 290X TRIX GPU's in the computer. CPU utilization is only at 14% and that is consistent across all the computers. All the other computers are set up the exact same way and don't seem to have an issue. I've also checked GPU-Z and even though the GPU's are being half as productive as the other GPU's in the other computers they are still showing 100% utilization.
Also I'm using F@H client 7.4.4 on all computers.
Any ideas?
The hardware is actually identical to five other computers in that room and the GPU's in the others computers are running at twice the speed (in terms of PPD) of the computer in question. The reporting has been extremely consistent but I am puzzled as to why. All the computers in that room are running two R9 290X TRIX GPU's and it is only the GPU's that are showing half the speed. All the computers are using Catalyst 14.4 drivers.
I know many will suspect the GPU's are being bottle necked. Each machine has a I7 4770K and I'm only using one core to fold and there are only two R9 290X TRIX GPU's in the computer. CPU utilization is only at 14% and that is consistent across all the computers. All the other computers are set up the exact same way and don't seem to have an issue. I've also checked GPU-Z and even though the GPU's are being half as productive as the other GPU's in the other computers they are still showing 100% utilization.
Also I'm using F@H client 7.4.4 on all computers.
Any ideas?
I also have 290x's running on 14.4's. I had to downclock two of them to 947 core, to get them to fold consistantly. At 1000 core, they would fold, but only do about 40,000 PPD, at 947 they do 150,000 PPd a day. I run 4 290x's on one machine with a 4770k. It prob has a bottleneck, but I get more PPD with the four, rather then 3. You might try downclocking them and see if it has any effect.
I had similar issues and have them all downclocked to 940 core now. That speed is set on all 15 of them.
I know it's obvious, but make sure your slider is moved into the full position. It is the only thing I can think of.
That was actually the first thing I checked because I thought it had to be it. Unfortunately, it wasn't. The slider is in the full position and I even reinstalled the client once when I rebuilt the machine.
Ironically when I rebuilt the machine I also rebuilt the machine next to it from the same image. I only have the issue on the one machine. I may have to swap GPU's from another machine tomorrow just to see what happens. I can see one GPU acting weird but two at the same time just seems odd.
I forgot to respond to the WU type. They are 0x17.
I can only think of a few more things that I do, that may or may not help. Make sure crossfire is turned off, disable ULPS in afterburner or in the REG. Check the core clocks, and make sure they are not throttling. Are all your Mobos the same? Check gpuz and see if they are not stuck in pci-e 1 mode. If you are using risers, maybe try swapping them. I am reaching, but i know how frustrating it is to troubleshoot.
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
Looks like I'm going to need a little help with one of my computers. Apparently the GPU's in one of my computers are producing half the expected PPD. I had mentioned this a few days ago and was going to rebuild it from scratch which I have done. Then I slowed down the GPU's to avoid WU that were essentially crashing. Then I let it run for a couple of days and timed it's work units compared to the computers next to it who's GPU's are running at the same speeds and one particular computer is indeed running at half normal speed and I have no idea why.
The hardware is actually identical to five other computers in that room and the GPU's in the others computers are running at twice the speed (in terms of PPD) of the computer in question. The reporting has been extremely consistent but I am puzzled as to why. All the computers in that room are running two R9 290X TRIX GPU's and it is only the GPU's that are showing half the speed. All the computers are using Catalyst 14.4 drivers.
I know many will suspect the GPU's are being bottle necked. Each machine has a I7 4770K and I'm only using one core to fold and there are only two R9 290X TRIX GPU's in the computer. CPU utilization is only at 14% and that is consistent across all the computers. All the other computers are set up the exact same way and don't seem to have an issue. I've also checked GPU-Z and even though the GPU's are being half as productive as the other GPU's in the other computers they are still showing 100% utilization.
Also I'm using F@H client 7.4.4 on all computers.
Any ideas?
The hardware is actually identical to five other computers in that room and the GPU's in the others computers are running at twice the speed (in terms of PPD) of the computer in question. The reporting has been extremely consistent but I am puzzled as to why. All the computers in that room are running two R9 290X TRIX GPU's and it is only the GPU's that are showing half the speed. All the computers are using Catalyst 14.4 drivers.
I know many will suspect the GPU's are being bottle necked. Each machine has a I7 4770K and I'm only using one core to fold and there are only two R9 290X TRIX GPU's in the computer. CPU utilization is only at 14% and that is consistent across all the computers. All the other computers are set up the exact same way and don't seem to have an issue. I've also checked GPU-Z and even though the GPU's are being half as productive as the other GPU's in the other computers they are still showing 100% utilization.
Also I'm using F@H client 7.4.4 on all computers.
Any ideas?
I also have 290x's running on 14.4's. I had to downclock two of them to 947 core, to get them to fold consistantly. At 1000 core, they would fold, but only do about 40,000 PPD, at 947 they do 150,000 PPd a day. I run 4 290x's on one machine with a 4770k. It prob has a bottleneck, but I get more PPD with the four, rather then 3. You might try downclocking them and see if it has any effect.
I had similar issues and have them all downclocked to 940 core now. That speed is set on all 15 of them.
I know it's obvious, but make sure your slider is moved into the full position. It is the only thing I can think of. Also check the work units on the slow computer and make sure they are 0x17 WU's.
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
Looks like I'm going to need a little help with one of my computers. Apparently the GPU's in one of my computers are producing half the expected PPD. I had mentioned this a few days ago and was going to rebuild it from scratch which I have done. Then I slowed down the GPU's to avoid WU that were essentially crashing. Then I let it run for a couple of days and timed it's work units compared to the computers next to it who's GPU's are running at the same speeds and one particular computer is indeed running at half normal speed and I have no idea why.
The hardware is actually identical to five other computers in that room and the GPU's in the others computers are running at twice the speed (in terms of PPD) of the computer in question. The reporting has been extremely consistent but I am puzzled as to why. All the computers in that room are running two R9 290X TRIX GPU's and it is only the GPU's that are showing half the speed. All the computers are using Catalyst 14.4 drivers.
I know many will suspect the GPU's are being bottle necked. Each machine has a I7 4770K and I'm only using one core to fold and there are only two R9 290X TRIX GPU's in the computer. CPU utilization is only at 14% and that is consistent across all the computers. All the other computers are set up the exact same way and don't seem to have an issue. I've also checked GPU-Z and even though the GPU's are being half as productive as the other GPU's in the other computers they are still showing 100% utilization.
Also I'm using F@H client 7.4.4 on all computers.
Any ideas?
The hardware is actually identical to five other computers in that room and the GPU's in the others computers are running at twice the speed (in terms of PPD) of the computer in question. The reporting has been extremely consistent but I am puzzled as to why. All the computers in that room are running two R9 290X TRIX GPU's and it is only the GPU's that are showing half the speed. All the computers are using Catalyst 14.4 drivers.
I know many will suspect the GPU's are being bottle necked. Each machine has a I7 4770K and I'm only using one core to fold and there are only two R9 290X TRIX GPU's in the computer. CPU utilization is only at 14% and that is consistent across all the computers. All the other computers are set up the exact same way and don't seem to have an issue. I've also checked GPU-Z and even though the GPU's are being half as productive as the other GPU's in the other computers they are still showing 100% utilization.
Also I'm using F@H client 7.4.4 on all computers.
Any ideas?
I also have 290x's running on 14.4's. I had to downclock two of them to 947 core, to get them to fold consistantly. At 1000 core, they would fold, but only do about 40,000 PPD, at 947 they do 150,000 PPd a day. I run 4 290x's on one machine with a 4770k. It prob has a bottleneck, but I get more PPD with the four, rather then 3. You might try downclocking them and see if it has any effect.
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
The investor ipo is off putting IMO. It is just way too many coins given out for the amount of btc. I know there is no way to fix it now, but it is a big issue for me. Why not change the halfing to every year and increase the amount of coins distributed the first couple years. Currently at around 950000 points a day, it will take me nine months to get 10,000 coins, with this decreasing as the diff rises. I agree that initial investors should be able to reap some reward, but that is ridiculous. It was handled poorly and is the elephant in the room for this coin.
And why is it off putting? Because you didn't get into the ipo? Were you even mining cryptos when they launched the ipo since you only joined this forum in january?
Why not whine about NXT or BTC or about a more recent coin like Darkcoin?
Simply because of the fact that any moment a single person could crash the market, when it gets better established. I didn't say it was a deal breaker. I am supporting this coin, and all my hash power is on it. It is just something I think about when I check my machines and wonder if I should be hashing at this. I have been mining longer than I have been at this forum, but you are correct I did not get in the original btc startup. I am not whining, just stating my trepidation. I will continue to support Curecoin until I decide not to, it is my decision and I will live with it either way.
Think about it this way: a single person could crash Bitcoin as well. There are many people in the world with more money than the market cap, and thousands more businesses with more than enough money. The entire thing is a risk one way or the other.
I agree, I didn't post to make a stink. Was just stating my reservations about going all in on this project. Like I said, I am supporting it, and will continue to do so.
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
The investor ipo is off putting IMO. It is just way too many coins given out for the amount of btc. I know there is no way to fix it now, but it is a big issue for me. Why not change the halfing to every year and increase the amount of coins distributed the first couple years. Currently at around 950000 points a day, it will take me nine months to get 10,000 coins, with this decreasing as the diff rises. I agree that initial investors should be able to reap some reward, but that is ridiculous. It was handled poorly and is the elephant in the room for this coin.
And why is it off putting? Because you didn't get into the ipo? Were you even mining cryptos when they launched the ipo since you only joined this forum in january?
Why not whine about NXT or BTC or about a more recent coin like Darkcoin?
Simply because of the fact that any moment a single person could crash the market, when it gets better established. I didn't say it was a deal breaker. I am supporting this coin, and all my hash power is on it. It is just something I think about when I check my machines and wonder if I should be hashing at this. I have been mining longer than I have been at this forum, but you are correct I did not get in the original btc startup. I am not whining, just stating my trepidation. I will continue to support Curecoin until I decide not to, it is my decision and I will live with it either way.
Re: [ANN]CureCoin - Earn while you solve cures for Cancer. True 3.0 crypto
The investor ipo is off putting IMO. It is just way too many coins given out for the amount of btc. I know there is no way to fix it now, but it is a big issue for me. Why not change the halfing to every year and increase the amount of coins distributed the first couple years. Currently at around 950000 points a day, it will take me nine months to get 10,000 coins, with this decreasing as the diff rises. I agree that initial investors should be able to reap some reward, but that is ridiculous. It was handled poorly and is the elephant in the room for this coin.
Re: ★[ANN]★[GHC] Ghostcoin ☢ 4 Exchanges ☢ Fast ☢ POW/POS Hybrid ☢ OpenSSL Patched ☢
So I have over 300,000 GHC that i mined in the first week and havent touched the coins since and am only staking 50 GHC evry couple of days? Is that normal?? Seems like POS is going waaay slow
Maybe you have your wallet locked?That means that it can't mine, unless you unlock it for minting only.
Nope the wallet is not locked. Even if it was it wouldnnt receive anything. The thing is that I am receiving something but just small amounts.
Same for me ... wallet is not looked.
POS was working with no problems for days ... then i had to restart PC , since that time , no more POS ... any idea ?
Wallet ist the new version .
This is really frustrating. Why is the POS not working? Where is the dev in this coin? I heard it was him that started Whitecoin
Make sure your Ghostcoin.conf looks like this.
rpcuser=username
rpcpassword=password
rpcallowip=127.0.0.1
daemon=1
server=1
listen=1
gen=0
port=14070
rpcport=14071
addnode=124.182.5.93
addnode=162.250.125.26
addnode=98.173.12.249
addnode=90.33.38.171
addnode=95.91.238.94
addnode=99.241.74.216
addnode=162.64.83.27
Re: ★[ANN]★[GHC] Ghostcoin ☢ 4 Exchanges ☢ Fast ☢ POW/POS Hybrid ☢ OpenSSL Patched ☢
Can someone please confirm that their wallet is on version 1.0.2 instead of the 1.2 that the op says?
Yes, 1.0.2 is correct.
Re: ★[ANN]★[GHC] Ghostcoin ☢ 4 Exchanges ☢ Fast ☢ POW/POS Hybrid ☢ OpenSSL Patched ☢
I think he should use his premine for bounty's for the coins develepment and giveaways, not just sit on them
I agree. I think he said bounty's will be up soon. So we will see if any talent can help us out. I for one love POS coins, and this one is pretty sweet in that regard.