Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 142 results by walnutter
Re: [WDC] Worldcoin | 3.0 Flirtatious Ant Released! | Multicoin architecture
Here are instructions for adding Worldcoin WDC to AtomicDEX. As the name implies, it's decentralized exchange. It works on Komodo platform. They already have the big coins and are now looking for more coins that are not widely available in big exchanges. Any supported coin/token can be traded for any supported coin/token so there are thousands of potential market pairs already.
UTXO coins need this RPC API calls: https://github.com/KomodoPlatform/coins#prerequisites-for-a-coin-to-be-compatible-with-atomicdex-api
UTXO coins also need electrumx support, the coin must be added to: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrumx/blob/master/electrumx/lib/coins.py
and someone needs to run the needed servers
best is to write to partners@komodoplatform.com
UTXO coins need this RPC API calls: https://github.com/KomodoPlatform/coins#prerequisites-for-a-coin-to-be-compatible-with-atomicdex-api
UTXO coins also need electrumx support, the coin must be added to: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrumx/blob/master/electrumx/lib/coins.py
and someone needs to run the needed servers
best is to write to partners@komodoplatform.com
Re: [ANN]XDNA-Revolution in cryptocurrency|POS|Charity Support|NoICO|
Here is another exchange where XDNA could be added. Even though it has low liquidity, it would still help spread XDNA.
https://www.nlexch.com/listing
https://twitter.com/NLexch/status/1185537827632832512
https://www.nlexch.com/listing
https://twitter.com/NLexch/status/1185537827632832512
Re: [WDC] Worldcoin | 3.0 Flirtatious Ant Released! | Multicoin architecture
Thank you for the explanation. That's what i was waiting for instead of some newbie poster just saying "Hey, i got you a new wallet. Please start using it.". 
Re: [WDC] Worldcoin | 3.0 Flirtatious Ant Released! | Multicoin architecture
Hello guys, it's Xanur here from the worldcoin global forum and discord.
I'm not good with words and english is not my first language so I will get to the point.
A lot has happened the last couple of years in the history of Worldcoin. We have had our ups and downs (mostly). After the Scharmbeck incident/scam or whatever you want to call it, we lost most of our community members. Some community members tried to pick it up and continue the further development of Worldcoin.
First the Worldcoin Alliance was formed. I don't know the details, but most of the board members disappeared just like the first team. Thankfully Berzeck picked up the project and continued the development of the Worldcoin wallet. As most of you know, Berzeck stepped down in 2017 because of issues with a Chinese group of people.
Berzeck left the Worldcoin protocol mostly untouched, because of disagreement within the community. Because of this the asics/multipools hit us hard and peaks in network difficulty led to an unstable network, too fast or too slow blocktimes etc. Alferz from the Worldcoin Global forum came up with the proposal to fork Worldcoin and use the CryptoNight PoW algorithm as a (temporary) solution. I support this as a temporary solution and decided to work on this as of september.
I want to hear what the community thinks about this, and if there is support from within the community. Keep in mind this is a temporary solution and after the fork is done, I want to come up with a longterm plan for further development.
I am aiming for a fork Q4 this year. However my resources (mostly time) is also limited. Nevertheless development will continue on.
I'm not good with words and english is not my first language so I will get to the point.
A lot has happened the last couple of years in the history of Worldcoin. We have had our ups and downs (mostly). After the Scharmbeck incident/scam or whatever you want to call it, we lost most of our community members. Some community members tried to pick it up and continue the further development of Worldcoin.
First the Worldcoin Alliance was formed. I don't know the details, but most of the board members disappeared just like the first team. Thankfully Berzeck picked up the project and continued the development of the Worldcoin wallet. As most of you know, Berzeck stepped down in 2017 because of issues with a Chinese group of people.
Berzeck left the Worldcoin protocol mostly untouched, because of disagreement within the community. Because of this the asics/multipools hit us hard and peaks in network difficulty led to an unstable network, too fast or too slow blocktimes etc. Alferz from the Worldcoin Global forum came up with the proposal to fork Worldcoin and use the CryptoNight PoW algorithm as a (temporary) solution. I support this as a temporary solution and decided to work on this as of september.
I want to hear what the community thinks about this, and if there is support from within the community. Keep in mind this is a temporary solution and after the fork is done, I want to come up with a longterm plan for further development.
I am aiming for a fork Q4 this year. However my resources (mostly time) is also limited. Nevertheless development will continue on.
Sound great Xanur. If there are any Devs who want to help, or anyone who is interested in joining the worldcoin community discussions on discord, please join.
https://discord.gg/Hy6a3sc
Have you, worldcoindeveloper, contacted other WDC devs in that discord channel? Have you had any discussions with them?
The beauty of cryptocurrencies is that you don't need to trust anyone. You can download the source code and build it yourself! (Though I'll admit it's a pain in the ass, I've only got the linux version of the wallet compiling right now).
You absolutely need to trust a developer of the wallet. Otherwise wallet user could lose all their coins and it might cause a fork which would destroy WDC.
You appeared here out of nowhere and said you alone will make a new wdc wallet and then few days later it's done. Then you expect that everyone will just install your wallet without any information about what is done to it and why the new wallet was needed?
Then there is this other user who just "added seednodes" to the latest old style wallet instead of just listing the nodes that users can add with addnode console command and then expect that others will install his new wallet. That is ridiculous.
Re: [WDC] Worldcoin | 3.0 Flirtatious Ant Released! | Multicoin architecture
I don't trust your "new" wallet, Olker1. You could have added some hidden backdoors that steal user's wallet or steals all their WDC.
Sound great Xanur. If there are any Devs who want to help, or anyone who is interested in joining the worldcoin community discussions on discord, please join.
https://discord.gg/Hy6a3sc
Hello guys, it's Xanur here from the worldcoin global forum and discord.
I'm not good with words and english is not my first language so I will get to the point.
A lot has happened the last couple of years in the history of Worldcoin. We have had our ups and downs (mostly). After the Scharmbeck incident/scam or whatever you want to call it, we lost most of our community members. Some community members tried to pick it up and continue the further development of Worldcoin.
First the Worldcoin Alliance was formed. I don't know the details, but most of the board members disappeared just like the first team. Thankfully Berzeck picked up the project and continued the development of the Worldcoin wallet. As most of you know, Berzeck stepped down in 2017 because of issues with a Chinese group of people.
Berzeck left the Worldcoin protocol mostly untouched, because of disagreement within the community. Because of this the asics/multipools hit us hard and peaks in network difficulty led to an unstable network, too fast or too slow blocktimes etc. Alferz from the Worldcoin Global forum came up with the proposal to fork Worldcoin and use the CryptoNight PoW algorithm as a (temporary) solution. I support this as a temporary solution and decided to work on this as of september.
I want to hear what the community thinks about this, and if there is support from within the community. Keep in mind this is a temporary solution and after the fork is done, I want to come up with a longterm plan for further development.
I am aiming for a fork Q4 this year. However my resources (mostly time) is also limited. Nevertheless development will continue on.
I'm not good with words and english is not my first language so I will get to the point.
A lot has happened the last couple of years in the history of Worldcoin. We have had our ups and downs (mostly). After the Scharmbeck incident/scam or whatever you want to call it, we lost most of our community members. Some community members tried to pick it up and continue the further development of Worldcoin.
First the Worldcoin Alliance was formed. I don't know the details, but most of the board members disappeared just like the first team. Thankfully Berzeck picked up the project and continued the development of the Worldcoin wallet. As most of you know, Berzeck stepped down in 2017 because of issues with a Chinese group of people.
Berzeck left the Worldcoin protocol mostly untouched, because of disagreement within the community. Because of this the asics/multipools hit us hard and peaks in network difficulty led to an unstable network, too fast or too slow blocktimes etc. Alferz from the Worldcoin Global forum came up with the proposal to fork Worldcoin and use the CryptoNight PoW algorithm as a (temporary) solution. I support this as a temporary solution and decided to work on this as of september.
I want to hear what the community thinks about this, and if there is support from within the community. Keep in mind this is a temporary solution and after the fork is done, I want to come up with a longterm plan for further development.
I am aiming for a fork Q4 this year. However my resources (mostly time) is also limited. Nevertheless development will continue on.
Sound great Xanur. If there are any Devs who want to help, or anyone who is interested in joining the worldcoin community discussions on discord, please join.
https://discord.gg/Hy6a3sc
Re: [WDC] Worldcoin | 3.0 Flirtatious Ant Released! | Multicoin architecture
This newbie worldcoindeveloper seems very much fake. Don't believe him/her. When Worldcoin starts to get stronger, scared little trolls and scammers crawl out from the gutter wanting to destroy it.
Re: [WDC] Worldcoin | 3.0 Flirtatious Ant Released! | Multicoin architecture
Where do I download the latest wallet for WDC?
Latest Worldcoin wallet source code is here https://github.com/WorldcoinGlobal/WorldcoinPanel/releases
and
latest compiled wallet is here https://downloads.worldcoin.global/wallets/
Read the README.pdf found on that address.
These links are derived from http://cryptocoin.cc/?newsid=00370
Can someone explain why Embercoin wallet uses huge amounts of network traffic? It has been over 40GB in 24 hours. My guess is that it has something to do with the debuglog getting filled with ORPHAN BLOCK notifications. Size of that debuglog grows very fast.
Re: [ANN] FedoraCoin (TiPS) - New Dev team: Fedoracoin Foundation
I have a working TIPS wallet 2.0.0 synced up. My coins are four years old and conf file has addnodes from https://www.coinexchange.io/network/peers/TIPS and few from before the fork.
http://imgur.com/a/x4mWg
I haven't tried to send anything to anywhere yet.
http://imgur.com/a/x4mWg
I haven't tried to send anything to anywhere yet.
Re: [ANN] Snowballs | ONE MORE HARD FORK to BALLS 2.0.2 | BALLS/MMXIV Market OPEN
im still getting the db error time to time, what im doing wrong? im on the latest wallet and i re-download the enteire blockchain few days ago...
Start the wallet with "-maxconnection=10". You can use bigger connection limit if you want. Just check with "getpeerinfo" console command that all of those connections are version 2.0.2.
Old version of wallets will cause that database exception to happen.
Use "repairwallet" console command to fix failed staking caused by that db error.
Re: [ANN] Snowballs | ONE MORE HARD FORK to BALLS 2.0.2 | BALLS/MMXIV Market OPEN
I have found better alternative solution for the database exception bug than just IP banning.
I now start the wallet with "-maxconnection=10". That will limit connections that the wallet accepts so when all of those 10 connections are version 2.0.2, old version of wallets can't connect and that database exception doesn't happen.
You really should disconnect old incompatible versions after hard fork. Some people are lazy, some lack the needed skills to update their wallet
and some trolls just want to cause problems with old wallets. I saw few version 1.0.4 wallets connected to my wallet after hard fork.
I now start the wallet with "-maxconnection=10". That will limit connections that the wallet accepts so when all of those 10 connections are version 2.0.2, old version of wallets can't connect and that database exception doesn't happen.
You really should disconnect old incompatible versions after hard fork. Some people are lazy, some lack the needed skills to update their wallet
and some trolls just want to cause problems with old wallets. I saw few version 1.0.4 wallets connected to my wallet after hard fork.
Re: [ANN] Snowballs | ONE MORE HARD FORK to BALLS 2.0.2 | BALLS/MMXIV Market OPEN
Code:
EXCEPTION: 11DbException
Db::put: Cannot allocate memory
Snowballs in ProcessMessages()
ProcessMessage(checkpoint, 110 bytes) FAILED
I suspect that a node running an old version 2.0.1 tries to connect and causes a reorganization, but fails. Just after the fork the 2.0.1 nodes were successful because the blocks to reorganize were only a few, but now 10,000 blocks are too many blocks.
I've been able to stake today after getting that message, so I guess it is not a big issue ...
Re: [ANN] Snowballs | ONE MORE HARD FORK to BALLS 2.0.2 | BALLS/MMXIV Market OPEN
i had the db error thing pop up on my wallet after restarting the client. I first did repairwallet through the console window, it did indeed find a spent coin mismatch, then I shut down balls client and restarted using -rescan as a flag in the shortcut. the error returned so i deleted debug.log and db.log restarted with the -rescan flag via shortcut and then the message went away along with the checkpoint error. so far been 30min no issues.
I did all this and all seemed fine for awhile but the error came back. When i got stake i decided to test "repairwallet" command and it found a mismatch which was the same amount as the stake. Now everytime i use repairwallet, it will revert my account balance to what it was before the block count reached 360K.I have also tested to send coins to another address in same wallet. I sent 10000 BALLS and the wallet says it is over the size limit and i need to pay 6.4 BALLS transaction fee. Even 1000 BALLS is over the size limit.
Re: [ANN] NoirShares UPDATE REQUIRED Advanced Features✔, Unique PoW✔
Good to hear you didn't give up barwizi, have a question.
For those who got snapshop, did not export private key still keeping the old wallet how do they get the new relaunched noirshares?
It seems the wallet doesn't sync nowadays so can't export private key at this moment.
For those who got snapshop, did not export private key still keeping the old wallet how do they get the new relaunched noirshares?
It seems the wallet doesn't sync nowadays so can't export private key at this moment.
I would like to know solution to this problem.
Re: [ANN][FOOD] Plankton - Distribution Phase Initiated - Come get it whales!
Is this open-sourced organic food? When is the source released?
Coins received. Thank you. Just wanted to bump my question with the quote.
Re: [ANN] FIMKrypto: NXT spinoff 30s blocks, POW-like rewards, national income *FIMK
Quote
Krypto FIN ry Administrative Board of Directors:
- Svante Lehtinen, President & Chairman of the Board, e-mail eliphaz@fimk.fi
- Konsta Gogoljuk, Vice president, e-mail konsta.gogoljuk@gmail.com
- Lassi Nokelainen, Secretary & Treasurer, e-mail kummofromrrm@gmail.com
- Svante Lehtinen, President & Chairman of the Board, e-mail eliphaz@fimk.fi
- Konsta Gogoljuk, Vice president, e-mail konsta.gogoljuk@gmail.com
- Lassi Nokelainen, Secretary & Treasurer, e-mail kummofromrrm@gmail.com
Onko tässä YLE:n arkistosta löytyvässä haastattelussa oleva IT-alan yrittäjä Svante Lehtinen sama henkilö kuin ylläoleva?
http://yle.fi/elavaarkisto/artikkelit/pikavippiparonit_51400.html#media=51401 - 10 minuutin kohdalla.
Is this the same Svante Lehtinen as above mentioned President & Chairman of the Board? At the 10 minute mark on the video.
