Twitter username: @cryptoairsignup
Telegram username @cryptoairteam2
Myetherwallet: 0x76e8a41d7e2c68ea77f8c1c3be9a30c2eb42269c

So you will be utilizing the income gained from airdrop promotions to buy back pool tokens and create more pool project synergies? What would the your company's prediction of a successful year of pool token contain?

 Bitcointalk username: Warriorcryptobar
Did you join the airdrop: Y
ETH address: 0x76e8a41d7e2c68ea77f8c1c3be9a30c2eb42269c

Bitcointalk username:  warriorcryptobar
Profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2084728
Facebook Link :https://www.facebook.com/anwar.barake
Twitter Link : https://twitter.com/cryptoairsignup
Telegram : @cryptoairteam2
Spreadsheet #: 3361

Exchange Traded Funds seem to be the greenlight for smart money.  We need ETF. Everyone is hoping this will just rocket to 1m dollars but no one really cares how safe it is to put in the hands of every living person on the planet.

The challenges are attaining the price points that allow for margins to expand or atleast facilitate growth. A lot of small business have terrible sources for the concept to work. When you hear of businesses failing, its not because they cannot cultivate opportunistic events, it is that the opportunity itself is limited. The small business isn't trying to monopolize the solution, it's competition can usually piece apart what made the concept work in the first place. These are a few challenges I have come across. Competition, incomplete solution, margins that have little or no room for growth.

Yea im right there with you on this phrase. I hate that their is a yin and a yang to this element. Usually poverty is a result of stupidity, and visa versa. One falls back on the other, always being led by inevitability. Its almost a choice, as if it wasn't such an easy rut to fall back into.

No I do not think it will fall into a correction. I note, there is no reason to go down in the fight here. I note how people ask this now, and not the last time we were at this price. There is more focus on the market this time. All the more reason to rally into the faces of neysayers.

I love the idea of kicking out poverty. But the whole reason in poverty is because  spend more than they can hodl. Giving a spendable thing to people that are in a hole, isnt a solution to poverty, unless we plan on locking the funds up on their behalf via some smart system protocols allowing the funds to become what they will be worth. The solution.

There isn't a lot of due diligence in terms of team and process. The majority of review websites are paid to give the best points. Most investors or enthusiasts are more interested in the name than what it can do because frankly its not ready to be placed into every individuals pocket tomorrow.
Crypto as a whole. The teams are thought to be CEO of a ship that might be sinking, and we have seen project after project pump and dump or abandon ship. Some even moving onto their 6th project. Teams are trying more and more to find like minded schemers, parting man from coin, rather than changing an environment thats not needing their solution for more than a week.  No one commits to their projects because of how this will inevitably go. Everyone will use ONE or TWO products for so much of the money being raised that I don't understand how so many projects missed the boat in concept stage. When multinational conglomerates stay they are working on secretive blockchain projects while the richest in the world are stating it is not what you think, there is a real façade of how this is going to play out.
 All things hinge on Crypto Exchange Traded Funds, and then smart money will come in and fund what needs to happen in a regulated environment. Mass Adoption might as well be considered stalled for the first world countries. Thats how I see it anyway. A few infrastructures have to get through, but other than that, this is startup exuberance leading. Love the atmosphere, though its getting a bit old pushing all this niche sector stuff thats going to raise one million dollars and get walked on by a major in a day.

The war on cryptocurrency is that of a concerned parent. We want this to be the best it can be before we let it in. And what is, isn't ready for the masses. Although we would like to believe dumping a trillion dollars into something that isnt ready would in fact speed it up, it would also be a huge waste of effort and time for people to work on the very thing a single corporation could most likely produce. When its ready for the people, they will deregulate as they do all things worth emerging.

The long term argument for bitcoin. If I told you bitcoin was a phone the best on the market would you bet happy with what you have? I rest my case. When its ready to be called what it is, every individual on the planet will recognize what it was created for.

I made good grades back in the day. I went to college, started economics thinking I was going to own the world. Then the easiest teach threw me the biggest curve ball in the easiest question and I didn't understand. I may have understood 99 percent of every problem in the book. It only took one percent of what I didnt understand to tip the curve.

I tried to acknowledge this argument. The answer is if you want to have cake and eat it, be ready to fill bigger shoes.

 I'm not sure if I understand your question. Are you scared that the gov will see transactions, or are you scared they will infiltrate it to sabatoge its intrinsic value?
The currencies have different potentials. If they want to regulate one coin to work a certain way they can do that. They won't let people demonstrate as a coin community if thats what your asking because in specific countries the rule of fiat liabilities arise. Can they protect the digitial peer to peer technology, yes. Will they let people guise its use for utility uprisings, no. I know if they need it, they will find a way. We know the limits within reason for a global thing to work. These niche coins, are meant for borders. To each border its own. But few coins will have rules we don't misuse in specific regions.

This sounds like lower for longer mentality. Not sure as to who they are, but most of the market seems to think there is more to this than just taking it up because its moon time. The nuance of the stuff not doing anything must fade, so that the market will realize where the value needs to go. Without this, we are nothin but degenerates.

I have two favorite books. I have Buffet-ology. Basically it enlightens your optics on time frames and how to value what Monday is to 30 years. Durable competitive advantages and the meat of stocks, the cash flow income statement and balance sheet  cheats.
The other book is Thomas Bukowski. I use to find chart patterns. You still need to know what kind of market you are in, but they do work like a charm if you use them right. His charts are followed by people that win a lot. Most interpret lazily. Check them out,
I came out of buffetology never wanting to invest in a stock without seeing financials. Bukowski showed me how accurate history tends to repeat itself.
Worth both buys. You have to take notes, but it will last a lifetime, nothing beats learning to read financials from buffets perspective

Great informational update. The actual irony is that the topic can be misleading. Following suit, google did the exact same thing, regulating a portion of crypto on their brand, and then rolling back those rules. FB is basically saying, we ban you, then we let you back in. Just be minding p and q.

This is a major pivot. Before I wasn't sure if google is the throttle to mass adoption. Now I see they are trying to regulate so they can accept in their infrastructure. It will take time, but this is a great sign for the industry on the whole. 

will gold be outdated by fiat? This is the kind of question we ask ourselves when we compare something we don't fully understand, to something meant to coexist. Outdating is a complex arguement, because everything has a time and place to be the flavor.

What btc will provide, will not become outdated. The other currencies looking to expand on its origin would have to be valued for the percentage of innovation and then compared to the creation of the cryptocurrency in the first place. Its like giving credit for good genes. Satoshi took things from different projects, and made one product providing all the things they tried to deliver. Sure, some one will come along at the right time, and say, hey this is missing this, that is missing those, and solve. Still the amount of time since btc creation, and what it provided for 8 years without any real competition, makes the probability of there being an aspect to solve that would catapult a currency to stardom, less and less about what separates the coins, and more about compatibility and agnosticism.