Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 667 results by waspoza
⭐ Merited by ABCbits (6)
can any one post an fail2ban jail for that?
Good idea. Instructions how to make one:
First make sure that you have logips=1 in your bitcoin.conf, otherwise it won't work. Need to restart bitcoind after this change.
In /etc/fail2ban/jail.local add following at the end of file:
Code:
[bitcoin]
enabled = true
port = 8333
filter = bitcoin
logpath = /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/debug.log
maxretry = 0
bantime = 2592000
findtime = 2592000
Make sure logpath is pointing to the right place. I set bantime for 1 month, adjust to your liking.enabled = true
port = 8333
filter = bitcoin
logpath = /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/debug.log
maxretry = 0
bantime = 2592000
findtime = 2592000
Create file /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/bitcoin.conf and put following inside:
Code:
# Fail2Ban configuration file for bitcoin
#
[Definition]
failregex = .*receive version message: Why\? Because fuck u.*peeraddr=:.*
ignoreregex =
#
[Definition]
failregex = .*receive version message: Why\? Because fuck u.*peeraddr=:.*
ignoreregex =
fail2ban-client reload should add new jail, check /var/log/fail2ban.log for errors.
fail2ban-client status should show bitcoin jail:
Code:
Status
|- Number of jail: 2
`- Jail list: ssh, bitcoin
|- Number of jail: 2
`- Jail list: ssh, bitcoin
And fail2ban-client status bitcoin should show something like this:
Code:
Status for the jail: bitcoin
|- filter
| |- File list: /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/debug.log
| |- Currently failed: 0
| `- Total failed: 16
`- action
|- Currently banned: 16
| `- IP list: 77.34.27.96 95.53.51.198 176.50.123.107 178.64.113.245 93.120.208.183 77.82.86.29 5.199.198.144 77.40.25.121 178.35.111.80 37.23.153.174 178.67.71.3 95.129.179.54 92.37.141.207 176.50.198.19 37.78.17.90 95.70.82.79
`- Total banned: 16
|- filter
| |- File list: /home/bitcoin/.bitcoin/debug.log
| |- Currently failed: 0
| `- Total failed: 16
`- action
|- Currently banned: 16
| `- IP list: 77.34.27.96 95.53.51.198 176.50.123.107 178.64.113.245 93.120.208.183 77.82.86.29 5.199.198.144 77.40.25.121 178.35.111.80 37.23.153.174 178.67.71.3 95.129.179.54 92.37.141.207 176.50.198.19 37.78.17.90 95.70.82.79
`- Total banned: 16
Enjoy!
⭐ Merited by ABCbits (2)
If you're running 0.12 you can ban a node by its ip address
with rpc call
setban add
Problem is there are hundreds of them. Pretty tedious doing it by hand.
Edit: After some hours my patch banned 83 of them:
Code:
bitcoin@bananapi:~/bin$ ./bitcoin-cli listbanned|grep addr
"address": "2.60.204.57/32",
"address": "5.136.220.110/32",
"address": "5.137.251.169/32",
"address": "5.138.15.217/32",
"address": "5.139.87.106/32",
"address": "5.142.27.229/32",
"address": "5.143.55.24/32",
"address": "5.143.115.180/32",
"address": "31.23.195.149/32",
"address": "31.23.231.195/32",
"address": "31.163.105.183/32",
"address": "31.180.152.1/32",
"address": "31.181.162.179/32",
"address": "37.23.253.228/32",
"address": "46.41.92.99/32",
"address": "46.41.97.157/32",
"address": "46.41.115.251/32",
"address": "46.48.167.72/32",
"address": "46.48.179.188/32",
"address": "46.159.121.207/32",
"address": "46.191.253.244/32",
"address": "77.34.87.50/32",
"address": "77.34.108.82/32",
"address": "77.41.95.148/32",
"address": "78.37.227.67/32",
"address": "79.105.223.109/32",
"address": "81.30.123.42/32",
"address": "81.163.37.42/32",
"address": "85.173.74.60/32",
"address": "85.173.190.40/32",
"address": "86.102.32.234/32",
"address": "87.225.42.163/32",
"address": "87.225.89.116/32",
"address": "88.200.246.39/32",
"address": "90.150.248.22/32",
"address": "91.147.24.172/32",
"address": "92.37.155.47/32",
"address": "92.37.182.182/32",
"address": "92.37.223.99/32",
"address": "92.101.41.148/32",
"address": "92.101.106.113/32",
"address": "93.178.114.164/32",
"address": "94.233.7.122/32",
"address": "94.233.69.6/32",
"address": "94.233.211.110/32",
"address": "94.245.139.200/32",
"address": "94.245.183.30/32",
"address": "95.37.173.26/32",
"address": "95.53.187.129/32",
"address": "95.55.215.16/32",
"address": "95.70.2.205/32",
"address": "95.70.48.54/32",
"address": "95.70.48.232/32",
"address": "95.70.70.7/32",
"address": "95.72.181.180/32",
"address": "95.72.236.7/32",
"address": "95.110.12.169/32",
"address": "95.159.159.94/32",
"address": "95.159.179.222/32",
"address": "95.165.154.153/32",
"address": "95.189.49.30/32",
"address": "95.190.31.191/32",
"address": "109.165.117.185/32",
"address": "109.184.70.22/32",
"address": "109.184.176.205/32",
"address": "109.229.105.198/32",
"address": "176.49.173.143/32",
"address": "176.50.215.156/32",
"address": "176.120.199.230/32",
"address": "176.209.67.249/32",
"address": "178.35.46.76/32",
"address": "178.35.130.106/32",
"address": "178.64.0.241/32",
"address": "178.64.65.227/32",
"address": "178.64.151.255/32",
"address": "178.65.205.3/32",
"address": "178.67.164.232/32",
"address": "178.68.4.64/32",
"address": "178.68.36.162/32",
"address": "178.69.85.123/32",
"address": "178.184.58.144/32",
"address": "185.11.149.125/32",
"address": "188.19.140.210/32",
"address": "2.60.204.57/32",
"address": "5.136.220.110/32",
"address": "5.137.251.169/32",
"address": "5.138.15.217/32",
"address": "5.139.87.106/32",
"address": "5.142.27.229/32",
"address": "5.143.55.24/32",
"address": "5.143.115.180/32",
"address": "31.23.195.149/32",
"address": "31.23.231.195/32",
"address": "31.163.105.183/32",
"address": "31.180.152.1/32",
"address": "31.181.162.179/32",
"address": "37.23.253.228/32",
"address": "46.41.92.99/32",
"address": "46.41.97.157/32",
"address": "46.41.115.251/32",
"address": "46.48.167.72/32",
"address": "46.48.179.188/32",
"address": "46.159.121.207/32",
"address": "46.191.253.244/32",
"address": "77.34.87.50/32",
"address": "77.34.108.82/32",
"address": "77.41.95.148/32",
"address": "78.37.227.67/32",
"address": "79.105.223.109/32",
"address": "81.30.123.42/32",
"address": "81.163.37.42/32",
"address": "85.173.74.60/32",
"address": "85.173.190.40/32",
"address": "86.102.32.234/32",
"address": "87.225.42.163/32",
"address": "87.225.89.116/32",
"address": "88.200.246.39/32",
"address": "90.150.248.22/32",
"address": "91.147.24.172/32",
"address": "92.37.155.47/32",
"address": "92.37.182.182/32",
"address": "92.37.223.99/32",
"address": "92.101.41.148/32",
"address": "92.101.106.113/32",
"address": "93.178.114.164/32",
"address": "94.233.7.122/32",
"address": "94.233.69.6/32",
"address": "94.233.211.110/32",
"address": "94.245.139.200/32",
"address": "94.245.183.30/32",
"address": "95.37.173.26/32",
"address": "95.53.187.129/32",
"address": "95.55.215.16/32",
"address": "95.70.2.205/32",
"address": "95.70.48.54/32",
"address": "95.70.48.232/32",
"address": "95.70.70.7/32",
"address": "95.72.181.180/32",
"address": "95.72.236.7/32",
"address": "95.110.12.169/32",
"address": "95.159.159.94/32",
"address": "95.159.179.222/32",
"address": "95.165.154.153/32",
"address": "95.189.49.30/32",
"address": "95.190.31.191/32",
"address": "109.165.117.185/32",
"address": "109.184.70.22/32",
"address": "109.184.176.205/32",
"address": "109.229.105.198/32",
"address": "176.49.173.143/32",
"address": "176.50.215.156/32",
"address": "176.120.199.230/32",
"address": "176.209.67.249/32",
"address": "178.35.46.76/32",
"address": "178.35.130.106/32",
"address": "178.64.0.241/32",
"address": "178.64.65.227/32",
"address": "178.64.151.255/32",
"address": "178.65.205.3/32",
"address": "178.67.164.232/32",
"address": "178.68.4.64/32",
"address": "178.68.36.162/32",
"address": "178.69.85.123/32",
"address": "178.184.58.144/32",
"address": "185.11.149.125/32",
"address": "188.19.140.210/32",
I patched my client like this:
Code:
diff --git a/src/main.cpp b/src/main.cpp
index 0eb5b58..b870dd5 100644
--- a/src/main.cpp
+++ b/src/main.cpp
@@ -4388,6 +4388,16 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv,
else
pfrom->fRelayTxes = true;
+ // ban dumbass
+ if (pfrom->cleanSubVer.find("Why?") != std::string::npos)
+ {
+ pfrom->PushMessage(NetMsgType::REJECT, strCommand, REJECT_OBSOLETE, string("Banned. Why? Because fuck u, thats why"));
+ LogPrintf("Banning dumbass %d\n", pfrom->id);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), 100);
+ pfrom->fDisconnect = true;
+ return false;
+ }
+
// Disconnect if we connected to ourself
if (nNonce == nLocalHostNonce && nNonce > 1)
{
index 0eb5b58..b870dd5 100644
--- a/src/main.cpp
+++ b/src/main.cpp
@@ -4388,6 +4388,16 @@ bool static ProcessMessage(CNode* pfrom, string strCommand, CDataStream& vRecv,
else
pfrom->fRelayTxes = true;
+ // ban dumbass
+ if (pfrom->cleanSubVer.find("Why?") != std::string::npos)
+ {
+ pfrom->PushMessage(NetMsgType::REJECT, strCommand, REJECT_OBSOLETE, string("Banned. Why? Because fuck u, thats why"));
+ LogPrintf("Banning dumbass %d\n", pfrom->id);
+ Misbehaving(pfrom->GetId(), 100);
+ pfrom->fDisconnect = true;
+ return false;
+ }
+
// Disconnect if we connected to ourself
if (nNonce == nLocalHostNonce && nNonce > 1)
{
Re: 1,000,000 bits = 1 bitcoin. Future-proofing Bitcoin for common usage? VOTE
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPE, satoshies that is what we will use.
1 bitcent is 1 satoshi. Good enough for me.
Re: Why are fiat/banks destined to fail and bitcoin to succeed? Explain.
While that site is cool, it's far from convenient to have food shipped. I'm not going to order my groceries and wait 3-5 business days to be able to eat.
You can't order it with gold either, so gold is failure too, right?
Re: Why are fiat/banks destined to fail and bitcoin to succeed? Explain.
Because history repeating.
http://dailyreckoning.com/fiat-currency/
Quote
The history of fiat money, to put it kindly, has been one of failure. In fact, EVERY fiat currency since the Romans first began the practice in the first century has ended in devaluation and eventual collapse, of not only the currency, but of the economy that housed the fiat currency as well.
http://dailyreckoning.com/fiat-currency/
Re: [WTS] Bitcoin Betting Exchange/Prediction Market - Site to earn Bitcoins!
we're still technically in a bear market. i'd advice against throwing caution to the wind for at least a few more days 
Exactly. We din't even had single (closed) green candle yet.
Damn, thought it's too good to be true.
Not sure if this is joke or not: http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-957375
Paul Krugman:
http://web.archive.org/web/19980610100009/www.redherring.com/mag/issue55/economics.html
Quote
The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in "Metcalfe's law"--which states that the number of potential connections in a network is proportional to the square of the number of participants--becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet's impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine's.
http://web.archive.org/web/19980610100009/www.redherring.com/mag/issue55/economics.html
nice! when did he write that? i don't see a date.
June 1998 I think.
Paul Krugman:
http://web.archive.org/web/19980610100009/www.redherring.com/mag/issue55/economics.html
Quote
The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in "Metcalfe's law"--which states that the number of potential connections in a network is proportional to the square of the number of participants--becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005 or so, it will become clear that the Internet's impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine's.
http://web.archive.org/web/19980610100009/www.redherring.com/mag/issue55/economics.html
Just saying.
So you saying that bubble will burst at $1024 in two years?
Re: Do not despair. Hitler got screwed by Bitcoin weekend dip too.
Poor Hitler. He din't knew best speculating strategy that is explained in this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NG1qooBzE2w
Enjoyed watching that link, Paxman seemed genuinely interested.
$0.25 to $80 in 3 years should get just about anyone genuinely interested.
BTW Trace, that was a killer apperance, you were amazing!