Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 20 results by werghb4562
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Native Synthetic USD with Taproot
by
werghb4562
on 15/09/2025, 09:23:22 UTC
- The Oracle isn't native on-chain. However most Ethereum based contracts use central nodes (chainlink?) and work out fine?
Decentralization theater
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: The Ethereum killer storyline part 2 might be beginning
by
werghb4562
on 12/10/2024, 05:12:11 UTC
Decentralized-in-name-only-proof-of-60%-premined-stake scamcoin that pretends to protect its non-existent decentralization with tps limit struggles against another scamcoin better at decentralization theater. You reap what you sow.

"you know right now bitcoin transaction costs 5 cents which is fine right now because paypal's fees are even stupider but the internet of money should not cost 5 cents a transaction its kinnda absurd" -2017 vitalik buterin
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: [List] Ethereum and other smart contract L1s: How fair are tokenomics & launch?
by
werghb4562
on 09/10/2024, 02:33:33 UTC
⭐ Merited by d5000 (1)
These numbers are dubious. There is no way to verify that the founders did not increase their allocation by buying from their own sale for free in an underhanded manner.
However, ICOs give "normal users" at least a small opportunity to benefit from the value increase of a coin, even if it is by no means sure if such a value increase will occur. So I think it is appropiate to penalize projects a little bit less for ICOs than for the funds they allocate entirely for themselves or for their "Foundation".
I think that founders allocation is better than ICO because the centralization dangers are out in the open for everyone to assess properly. There is no hiding behind a potentially compromised ICO.

Where are the "eth killers" with zero premine? As far as I can tell none exist. Why? Isn't the so called technology behind eth worth relaunching on an L1 that doesn't have the centralization dangers of a 60% premine?
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: [List] Ethereum and other smart contract L1s: How fair are tokenomics & launch?
by
werghb4562
on 07/10/2024, 23:33:53 UTC
⭐ Merited by d5000 (1)
These numbers are dubious. There is no way to verify that the founders did not increase their allocation by buying from their own sale for free in an underhanded manner.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: Can ETH surpass BTC?
by
werghb4562
on 07/10/2024, 23:13:29 UTC
Why would a decentralized in name only scamcoin with a genesis block that rewarded its serial scamming founders with 60% of the current supply surpass bitcoin? In the entirety of its so called "defi" it doesn't have any trading pairs with national currencies.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: How did people buy bitcoin before Mt. Gox?
by
werghb4562
on 28/02/2024, 00:38:35 UTC
Before mtgox you bought bitcoin with an increased electricity bill, aka mining. These days if you want to buy without using the likes of anti-bitcoin scamcoin peddling exchanges like shitcoinbase that require you to upload a mugshot of yourself while holding your passport then you can use a decentralized exchange. Bisq is a decent option. Be caution however that most decentralized exchanges "dex" these days are scams. Everything built on eth is a scam. Despite all the hype and noise about eth being the king of "dex" there is not a single "dex" on eth that allows you to trade government currency like usd for bitcoin.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: What is your view and your opinion about Ethereum?
by
werghb4562
on 28/02/2024, 00:21:12 UTC
ethereum is a gigantic scam. The founder vitalik buterin is a serial scammer that claimed he could simulate quantum computers on classical computers to mine bitcoin faster than existing bitcoin asics. Vitalik buterin premined 72 million eth when he created it. That is 60% of the current supply. Proof of majority premined stake is not decentralized so why bother with blockchain? Blockchain is extremely slow, expensive, and inefficient. The only reason to use blockchain when eth was hopelessly centralized from the start is to fleece blockchain technobabble guzzling imbeciles.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: How to check if an altcoin is a scam
by
werghb4562
on 28/02/2024, 00:03:44 UTC
Check code is verified on Etherscan
ROFL. Use eth to check if an altcoin is a scam when eth itself is a gigantic scam. If an altcoin is like eth and has a huge majority of the supply premine then it is 100% a scam.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Merits 17 from 6 users
Re: Replacement for POW
by
werghb4562
on 21/12/2022, 20:27:36 UTC
⭐ Merited by NotATether (5) ,BlackHatCoiner (4) ,o_e_l_e_o (4) ,pooya87 (2) ,WhyFhy (1) ,DdmrDdmr (1)
And you be wrong, Ethereum is moving toward 100000 transactions per second and takes 1½ minutes to complete.
You're comparing what visa can do now to what buterin claims his scamcoin might be able to do in the future. Centralized ledgers pretending to be decentralized can do as many tps as their scam founder wants it to do. The only thing holding them back is the decentralization theater needed to differentiate their scam from ledgers that are honest about their centralization like visa.

You're doubling down on your bullshit lie. You said "address". An address is singular. No address with 1,125,150 bitcoin exists.

And they have no idea how many coins he mined after he switched rigs.
You have no idea how many coins buterin mined after he premined 72,000,000 a gigantic 60% of the current supply.

Are you really so clueless, that you don't know ethereum only switched to PoS this year.
So you should have said:
For example buterin's PoW scamcoin suffers from a gigantic premine and early mining.
By switching to PoS, he repents for the earlier mistake in using Proof of Waste.
It is literally impossible for coins to be distributed fairly without pow. Starting with pos requires a 100% premine. The only place where proof of 100% premined stake is decentralized is in the scammer decentralization theater.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Replacement for POW
by
werghb4562
on 20/12/2022, 22:41:14 UTC
Personally , I see PoW as a ridiculous outdated design , that should be thrown out as soon as possible.

Personally, I see pos as a ridiculously outdated design. Visa is faster, cheaper, more efficient than any pos scamcoin can ever be.


if that were true satoshi mining address would not have 1,125,150 bitcoins

You pulled that lie from your ass. No such address exists.



Please don't pretend that the entire world knew of btc so they could all start mining at the same time,

Premined pos scamcoins don't solve the early mining problem. For example buterin's pos scamcoin suffers from a gigantic premine and early mining.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin
by
werghb4562
on 16/09/2022, 19:23:45 UTC
Happy Halving Day
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: "Surprisingly, Tail Emission Is Not Inflationary" -- A post by Peter Todd
by
werghb4562
on 28/07/2022, 04:48:25 UTC
If proponents of perpetual debasement actually believed that such a scheme would result in more security they would fork off. The fact that they are not even considering it shows that they know such a fork would fail.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Merits 2 from 1 user
Re: [Megathread] The long-known PoW vs. PoS debate
by
werghb4562
on 29/03/2022, 03:26:50 UTC
⭐ Merited by JayJuanGee (2)

PoW miners face enormous costs and head aches in moving your PoW operation, not to mention the hardship of getting an industrial energy contract in the new country.
Takes weeks especially, if caught off guard about the ban.

PoS stakers can just move their laptop, or move their coins to a pool outside the country, at almost zero cost and within 2 hours all finished.

However if they wished, a PoS Staker can hide in any country and never be discovered since the energy efficiently hides them from all electric utilities.
PoW miners however, draw more power than residential use, and the electric utilities can pinpoint their location at a minute's notice.



A global pow ban with fantasy land effectiveness would cause the difficulty to drop to a level where laptops can mine if needed.



China did ban PoW mining.    Fact
PoW Miners did leave China.  Fact



There are still bitcoin miners in china.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin
by
werghb4562
on 31/10/2021, 04:35:46 UTC
Not sure where you got that number. My nmc node says 17692311.16437766 coins.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: MARA Pool mined its first 'clean' block today
by
werghb4562
on 11/05/2021, 06:57:41 UTC
Quote
If they can censor bitcoin, they can censor almost all altcoins too. At least we have Monero.

I don't see how monero is immune to this attack? The censor pool can mine empty monero blocks.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin
by
werghb4562
on 21/10/2020, 21:29:14 UTC
Try version 0.19.0.1. It should sync much faster. There is also Electrum-NMC from the beta downloads page which may allow you to import the seed from coinomi.

https://www.namecoin.org/download/betas/
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Merits 2 from 2 users
Re: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin
by
werghb4562
on 02/08/2020, 12:02:01 UTC
⭐ Merited by nutildah (1) ,BayAreaCoins (1)
At 0.00002000 1 BTC will buy 50,000 NMC or 0.23% of supply.
At 0.00000200 1 BTC will buy 500,000 NMC or 2.38% of supply.
At 0.00000020 1 BTC will buy 5,000,000 NMC or 23.8% of supply.
At 0.00000002 1 BTC will buy 50,000,000 NMC or 238% of supply.

Don't worry there is a price floor. I will buy it all at 2 satoshi.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [announce] Namecoin - a distributed naming system based on Bitcoin
by
werghb4562
on 21/05/2019, 13:54:46 UTC
You can use a key generator like this to get your namecoin out of poloniex. Once you get your wallet working you can sweep the private key.

https://github.com/iancoleman/bip39
https://iancoleman.io/bip39/
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: GMiner v1.20 Equihash 96,5/144,5/150,5(BEAM)/192,7/210,9/CuckooCycle(GRIN)
by
werghb4562
on 19/01/2019, 19:08:55 UTC
Below is GMiner uptime before crash. Each rig is 8x GTX 1070.

heater3 rig
Code:
18:01:07 Uptime: 0d 00:23:30 Electricity: 0.348kWh $0.04
18:01:22 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds

18:03:10 Uptime: 0d 00:01:30 Electricity: 0.022kWh $0.00
18:03:25 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds

18:49:13 Uptime: 0d 00:45:30 Electricity: 0.669kWh $0.08
18:49:17 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds

heater2 rig
Code:
18:20:56 Uptime: 0d 00:44:01 Electricity: 0.646kWh $0.08
18:21:20 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds

heater1 rig
Code:
18:09:27 Uptime: 0d 00:34:01 Electricity: 0.500kWh $0.06
18:09:31 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds

18:40:19 Uptime: 0d 00:30:30 Electricity: 0.448kWh $0.05
18:40:43 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds

19:01:01 Uptime: 0d 00:20:00 Electricity: 0.293kWh $0.04
19:01:06 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds

Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: GMiner v1.20 Equihash 96,5/144,5/150,5(BEAM)/192,7/210,9/CuckooCycle(GRIN)
by
werghb4562
on 19/01/2019, 18:37:16 UTC
Getting segfaults on v1.20 mining GRIN. Didn't happen on v1.19. Three different rigs

dmesg
Code:
Jan 19 18:01:20 heater3 kernel: [169200.518676] traps: miner[14672] general protection ip:43f73a sp:7fddbcdfca80 error:0
Jan 19 18:03:24 heater3 kernel: [169323.721784] miner[14892]: segfault at 7f3f18356760 ip 000000000043f73a sp 00007f171d7f9a80 error 4
miner log
Code:
18:01:22 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds
18:03:25 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds



dmesg
Code:
Jan 19 18:21:18 heater2 kernel: [127743.961280] miner[10807]: segfault at 7fc58743c9c0 ip 000000000043f73a sp 00007f96889fda80 error 4
miner log
Code:
18:21:20 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds



dmesg
Code:
Jan 19 18:09:29 heater1 kernel: [80227.703206] miner[7514]: segfault at 7f58b0b67740 ip 000000000043f73a sp 00007f309b7fda80 error 4
miner log
Code:
18:09:31 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds