Question. Why would LightBit be preferable in every day use cases compared to a feeless currency, like NANO. How will you follow through with your whitepaper?

So my reasoning is automatically false? Because I make a point against you and you won't respond? Yeah I'm a critic. But I'm not a troll or shill. Criticizing is a good thing, you need to respond to it professionally and give input on criticism.

But according to you this is all coming from my 5th grade debate club. Wow.

And FYI I will be expecting for you to correspond on swap, and to sufficiently swap my coins.

How will swap be implemented? I want to know if I can migrate my coins. Is it 1:1 swap ratio? Or 2:1. Personally I suggest 2:1 to lessen supply, you can pass that on to Liquid if you want.

2:1, for example if I had 5000 LITB and wanted to swap, I'd now have 2500 on the new network.

Honestly you could say that LightBit is primarily used to donate to the LightBit devs and I personally don't even believe you could pull that off.

It was very big of you to report the criticism of your chain to BitcoinTalk. Are you for real? Are you so thin-skinned you can't take honest opinion? Let me remind you of what you wrote.


I have never, and will never send you a PM on BitcoinTalk. This is just false. Do you know how I know this is not possible? I'm a Newbie. Newbies can't send PMs to you, because you've blocked them in your settings. And "cursing" you on your socials? Really? It's my right to criticize you all I want. You don't have to see it, or read it, but it's my right. And that right will be upheld by the fine folks at BitcoinTalk and any other social. Also, I don't think your project is a scam. It's very unlikely an optimistic person like yourself would want to scam people, and I respect your optimism. It's always a great thing to have. But too much optimism is a bad thing.

Keep in mind, you severely embellished this report. And "cursing"? I think the absolute worst thing I've said is "shit", and that's allowed on BitcoinTalk. I'm not actively harassing you like you claim. I'm criticizing you, and I will honestly continue to do it until you do something to turn this coin into something better.

It pains me to see such authoritarian-like reflexes from a "project leader". Really? Your first instinct is to try to get me banned and decrease my trust score? This is CCP levels of suppression, and I'll just keep commenting here if you keep doing petty stuff like that. Free speech is literally fueled by crypto, and I can't sit idle while you defame it. Disgusting.

About the GUI miner I was perhaps confused with the multiminer that has you listed. But that's not my main point. I can guarantee that you (yes YOU) are not doing any dev work whatsoever on the miner. You claim to have a great project, but how the hell can you insure that if you're not doing the development work? You're not even paying the cool people who are too nice to ask for payment on the project. PAY YOUR DEVS! Then you might get some good work out of a project you aren't even developing. You're just the hype man who wants to add another shitcoin to our overflowing markets.

About the exchanges. Where. Are. They. Definitely not on your [ANN], which is basically just a shitty generic png. And I've already proved they're not on CoinGecko. This can mean 2 things:

1) The exchanges you're on are so shitty, they can't even get a CoinGecko listing to add you (essentially meaning they have 0 volume)
2) The exchanges you're on are so shitty, they won't even update their coinlist for you
3) The exchanges you're on are so shitty, they know you have 0 volume on their exchanges and won't even add you

Ex4ange is an example of this. Not even on CoinGecko. Free listing. By all accounts, a shit exchange.


Mind my own business? You posted this on an [ANN] thread! This is exactly my business! And everyone elses! I was on your Discord a couple weeks ago, so your "we are all really working hard" is just BS. I bet Liquid is. I bet any other developer you're screwing over is. But you, YOU the so-called Natasha Otomoski are not working hard. The hard work in a cryptocurrency is developing, which is at the stage you're at anyways. If you're doing something other than developing right now you are doing this wrong. Development first, marketing later.

Now about sugarchain. Yes, I'm going to respond to every single one of your points.

Your codebase is virtually identical with sugarchain's, except for some stuff in block.cpp that your dev scrapped because it was unnecessary. So maybe sugar wasn't first, but you forked some yespower currency (there are like 7 now?).

Not to mention somebody's complete incompetence with git. I don't know who is running your GitHub account, but why would you upload TAR and ZIP files directly to a repo? That's for the releases. Plus, nine out of your TWELVE commits are just related to archive files.

Not to mention you can't even use .gitignore to remove the *.save files that are in your src/ directory and elsewhere.

You're just preying off of people new to crypto and it makes me sick.

It's a generic roadmap that every shitcoin has. There graphics are all stock images as well.

Yeah but you didn't design it did you? Another guy did it for free for you. And the miner supports multi coin, not just LightBit oriented.

If you're a noob, you should definitely not be starting with this chain. It's a mess, and frankly won't be alive in a year. Here are some coins I'd suggest that definitely aren't scams.

Bitcoin - It started the entire cryptocurrency arms race
Ethereum - An incredible smart contract blockchain, easy to learn, and it's fun to deploy contracts. Second to Bitcoin on CoinMarketCap
Tron - It's mooning right now (also SC platform)!
Grin - Privacy coin, raised millions of dollars
DASH - Masternodes! Get paid to help host the network.

Check any one of these out and you'll be far more rewarded than this blockchain with no devs.

If you don't have a specific launch day in mind, you shouldn't even ANNOUNCE the change.

Shit coin, shit devs. Just a fork of sugarchain.

Thanks! I'll take a look.

I mean it's just a fork I'm learning with for fun. So is there documentation for this then?

Oh ok thanks. I want to try to clarify though because I might've come across as misunderstood. My end goal is to put info on the blockchain that might not necessarily be a TX. I've looked for documentation on how to do this but everything seems pretty empty.

Hey everyone! I'm taking a look at Bitcoin core and am looking for where the TX is effectively "generated" and send out to an address. I've found the block reward, but I'm currently looking for where the transaction is sent out and recorded on the blockchain. If I don't understand something right, please correct me, otherwise, if you have an answer please tell me!

Thanks, Whoffie